Advertisement

Practical Applications of Virtual Organizations and Agent Technology

  • Juan M. Corchado
  • Gabriel Villarrubia
  • Juan F. De Paz
  • Sara Rodríguez
  • Carolina Zato
  • Fernando de la Prieta
  • Javier Bajo
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 365)

Abstract

Computation as interaction paradigm can be considered the most promising technological evolution in the areas of Computer Science and Communication in the last few years. Recent tendencies have conducted to the use of Virtual Organizations (VOs), which can be considered as a set of individuals and institutions that need to coordinate resources and services across institutional boundaries. Multi-agent systems (MAS) technology, which allows forming dynamic agent organizations, is particularly well suited as a support for the development of these open systems. PANGEA is an agent platform to develop open multi-agent systems, specifically those including organizational aspects such as virtual agent organizations. The platform allows the integral management of organizations and offers tools to the end user. Additionally, it includes a communication protocol based on the IRC standard, which facilitates implementation and remains robust even with a large number of connections.

Keywords

Multi-agent systems Virtual Organizations Dynamic architectures Adaptive Environments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Corchado, E., Pellicer, M.A., Borrajo, M.L.: A MLHL Based Method to an Agent-Based Architecture. International Journal of Computer Mathematics 86(10&11), 1760–1768 (2008); ISI JCR Impact Factor: 0.423Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.: Developing Multiagent Systems: The Gaia Methodology. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 12, 317–370 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bravo, J., Hervas, R., Chavira, G., Nava, S.: Modeling contexts by RFID-sensor fusión. In: Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, Pisa, Italy, pp. 30–34 (2006) ISBN: 076952520-2Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huhns, M., Stephens, L.: Multiagent Systems and Societies of Agents. In: Weiss, G. (ed.) Multi-agent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. MIT (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jennings, N., Wooldridge, M. (eds.): Agent Technology: Foundations, Applications and Markets. Springer (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.: Developing Multiagent Systems: The Gaia Methodology. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 12, 317–370 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zambonelli, F.: Abstractions and Infrastructures for the Design and Development of Mobile Agent Organizations. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Weiß, G., Ciancarini, P. (eds.) AOSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2222, pp. 245–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Esteva, M.: Electronic Institutions: from specification to development. Ph. D. Thesis, Technical University of Catalonia (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Dyke Parunak, H., Odell, J.J.: Representing Social Structures in UML. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Weiß, G., Ciancarini, P. (eds.) AOSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2222, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O., Michel, F.: From Agents to Organizations: An Organizational View of Multi-agent Systems. In: Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P., Odell, J. (eds.) AOSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2935, pp. 214–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Omicini, A., Ricci, A., Viroli, M.: Coordination artifacts: Environment-based coordination for intelligent agents. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 286–293 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pavón, J., Gómez-Sanz, J.J.: Agent oriented software engineering with INGENIAS. In: Mařík, V., Müller, J.P., Pěchouček, M. (eds.) CEEMAS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2691, pp. 394–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dignum, V.: A model for organizational interaction: based on agents, founded in logic, Ph.D. Thesis (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boissier, O., Gateau, B.: Normative multi-agent organizations: Modeling, support and control. Normative Multiagent Systems (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: Using the \(\mathcal{M}\) oise  +  for a cooperative framework of MAS reorganisation. In: Bazzan, A.L.C., Labidi, S. (eds.) SBIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3171, pp. 506–515. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Galland, S.: JANUS: Another Yet General-Purpose Multiagent Platform. Seventh AOSE Technical Forum, Paris (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Vieira, R.: Jason and the Golden Fleece of agent-oriented programming. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Platforms and Applications, ch. 1, pp. 3–37. Springer (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oikarinen, J., Reed, D.: Internet Relay Chat Protocol, RFC 1459 (May 1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kalt, C.: Internet Relay Chat: Client Protocol, RFC 2810, 2811, 2812, 2813 (April 2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen, M., Kwon, T., Yuan, Y., Choi, Y., Leung, V.C.M.: Mobile agent-based directed diffusion in wireless sensor networks. EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process., 219 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Zato, C., Villarrubia, G., Sánchez, A., Barri, I., Rubión, E., Fernández, A., Rebate, C., Cabo, J.A., Álamos, T., Sanz, J., Seco, J., Bajo, J., Corchado, J.M.: PANGEA – Platform for Automatic coNstruction of orGanizations of intElligent Agents. In: Omatu, S., De Paz Santana, J.F., González, S.R., Molina, J.M., Bernardos, A.M., Rodríguez, J.M.C. (eds.) Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence. AISC, vol. 151, pp. 229–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sánchez, A., Villarrubia, G., Macarro, A., Jiménez, A., Zato, C., Bajo, J., Rodríguez, S., Hallenborg, K., Corchado, J.M.: Learning languages using the mobile devices’ accelerometer. In: Vittorini, P., Gennari, R., Marenzi, I., De la Prieta, F., Corchado, J.M. (eds.) International Workshop on Evidenced-based Technology Enhanced Learning (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Villarrubia, G., Sánchez, A., Barri, I., Rubión, E., Fernández, A., Rebate, C., Cabo, J.A., Álamos, T., Sanz, J., Seco, J., Zato, C., Bajo, J., Rodríguez, S., Corchado, J.M.: Proximity detection prototype adapted to a work environment. In: Novais, P., Hallenborg, K., Tapia, D.I., Rodríguez, J.M.C. (eds.) Ambient Intelligence - Software and Applications. AISC, vol. 153, pp. 51–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zato, C., Sánchez, A., Villarrubia, G., de la Prieta, F., Rodríguez, S., Bajo, J., Corchado, J.M.: New Agent Platform with a Communication System based on the IRC Protocol. In: European Agent Systems Summer School (EASSS 2012), pp. 1–8 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan M. Corchado
    • 1
  • Gabriel Villarrubia
    • 1
  • Juan F. De Paz
    • 1
  • Sara Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Carolina Zato
    • 1
  • Fernando de la Prieta
    • 1
  • Javier Bajo
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento Informática y AutomáticaUniversidad de SalamancaSalamancaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Inteligencia ArtificialUniversidad Politécnica de MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations