Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nutzung von im Unternehmen durchgeführter Diagnostik für das Coaching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diagnostik im Coaching

Zusammenfassung

Silja Kotte und Ellen Künzel beschäftigen sich mit der Nutzung von in der Unternehmen durchgeführter Diagnostik im Coaching. Sie geben eine Übersicht über verschiedene Spielarten der Leistungs- und Potenzialbeurteilung in Organisationen und skizzieren die wichtigsten Forschungsbefunde zum diagnostischen Verhalten von Coaches sowie zur Verknüpfung von Assessment- und Feedbackprozessen mit Coaching. Durch exemplarische Prozessverläufe aus der Unternehmenspraxis geben sie einen Einblick in unterschiedliche Kombinationsmöglichkeiten von im Unternehmen durchgeführten Assessments mit anschließenden Coachingprozessen. Anhand von 3 konkreten Praxisbeispielen stellen sie Chancen und Stolpersteine in der Bearbeitung solcher Assessments im Coaching dar. Der Beitrag schließt mit einigen Leitfragen für Coaches sowie 6 Thesen für die Nutzung von in der Organisation durchgeführter Diagnostik im Coaching. Der Dreiecksgestaltung zwischen Coach, Coachee und Organisation kommt dabei besonderes Gewicht zu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Anseel, F. & Lievens, F. (2006). Certainty as a moderator of feedback reactions? A test of the strength of the self-verification motive. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 79, 533–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, L. & Brett, J.F. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360-feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66 (3), 532–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, L. & Brett, J.F. (2006). Feedback format: Does it influence manager’s reactions to feedback? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 517–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C. & Austin, M. (2006). 360 degree feedback and developmental outcomes: The role of feedback characteristics, self efficacy and importance of feedback dimensions to focal managers’ current role. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14 (1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey,C. & Fletcher, C. (2002). The impact of multiple source feedback on management development: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23 (7), 853–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T.E. & Klimowski, R.J. (1989). A field study of the relationship between the organizational feedback environment and performance. Personnel Psychology, 42, 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, C. & Williams, R. (1996). Performance management, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. British Journal of Management, 7, 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregura, G.J., Ford, J.M. & Brutus, S. (2003). Manager attention to multisource feedback. Journal of Management Development, 22, 345–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, A.N. & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: Historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühl, S. (2011). Organisationen. Eine sehr kurze Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabey, C. (2001). Closing the circle: participant views of a 360-degree feedback programme. Human Resource Management Journal, 11 (1), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, T., Mitchell, D. & Barbeite, F.G. (2002). Predictors of attitudes toward a 360-degree feedback system and involvement in post-feedback management development activity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowall, A. (2012). Using Feedback in Coaching. In J. Passmore (Hrsg.), Psychometrics in coaching. Using psychological and psychometric tools for development. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowall, A. & Kurz, R. (2008). How to get the best out of 360 degree feedback in coaching. The Coaching Psychologist, 4 (1), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowall, A. & Smewing, C. (2009). What assessments do coaches use in their practice and why. The Coaching Psychologist, 5 (2), 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrauger, J.S. & Rosenberg, S.E. (1970). Self-esteem and the effects of success and failure feedback on performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 404–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smither, J.W., London, M. & Reilly, R.R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58, 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steers, R.M. (1975). Task-goal attributes, n-achievements, and supervisory performance. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 13, 392–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Pol, J., Van den Berg, B., Admiral, W.F. & Simons, P. (2007). The nature, reception and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers and Education , 51 (4), 1804–1817.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, Universität Kassel, Holländische Str. 36-38, 34127, Kassel, Deutschland

    Silja Kotte

  2. Como Consult, Winterstr. 4, 22765, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Ellen Künzel

Authors
  1. Silja Kotte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ellen Künzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silja Kotte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, Fachgebiet Theorie und Methodik der Beratung,Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany

    Heidi Möller

  2. Institut für Psychologie, Fachgebiet Theorie und Methodik der Beratung,Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany

    Silja Kotte

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kotte, S., Künzel, E. (2013). Nutzung von im Unternehmen durchgeführter Diagnostik für das Coaching. In: Möller, H., Kotte, S. (eds) Diagnostik im Coaching. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37966-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37966-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37965-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37966-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation