Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China ((ATSTC))

  • 410 Accesses

Abstract

As stated previously, coal burning is one of the major sources of mercury pollution in China. Here, Hg0 and Hg2+ are main mercury speciation in flue gas from coal-fired power plants. Generally, water-soluble Hg2+ is relatively easy to remove by water scrubber. However, Hg0 is very difficult to control[1,2]. Currently, more studies have focused on using activated carbon or other sorbents to remove Hg(g) from coal-fired flue gas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dornet J.B. Carbon, 6: 161, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huggins, F.E., Huffman, G.P., Dunham, G.E., Senior, C.L. XAFS examination of mercury sorption on three activated carbons. Energy & Fuels, 13: 114–121, 1999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liberti L., Notarnicola M., Amicarelli V., Campanoro V., Roethel F., Swanson L. Waste Management Research, 16: 183–189, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karatzaa D., Lancia A., Musmarra D., Zucchini C. Study of mercury absorption and desorption on sulfur impregnated carbon. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 21: 150–155, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsumura Y. Atmos. Environment, 8: 1321–1327, 1974.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu W., Vidic R.D. Optimization of sulfur impregnation protocol for fixed bed application of activated carbon-based sorbents for gas-phase mercury removal. Environmental Science Technology, 32: 531–538, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mercury Study Report to Congress, Volume I: Executive Summary. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development, EPA-452rR-97-003, December 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown T.D., Smith D.N., Hargis R.A., O’Dowd W.J. Mercury measurement and its control: what we know, have learned, and need to further investigate. Journal of Air & Waste Management Association, 6: 1, 1999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller S.J., Dunham G.E., Olson E.S., Brown T.D. Flue gas effects on a carbon-based mercury sorbent. Flue Processing Technology, 65–66: 343–363, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Teller A.J., Quimby J.M. 84th Annual Meeting and Exhibition, AWMA, Vancouver, BC, 91–35.5, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts D.L., Stewart R.M. Novel Process for Removal and Recovery of Vapor Phase Mercury. Presented at First Joint Power&Flue Systems Contractors conference, Pittsburgh, PA, July 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yan T.Y. A novel process for Hg removal from gases. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 33: 3010, 1994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghorishi B., Jozewicz W., Gullet B.K., Sedman C.B. Mercury Control: Overview of Bench-Scale Research at EPA/APPCD. Presented at the First Joint Power & Flue Systems Contractors Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, July 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schager P., Hall B., Linquist O. Retention of Gaseous Mercury on Flyashes. Second International Conference on Mercury as a Global Pollutant. Monterey, CA, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tessmer C.H., Vidic R.D., Uranowski L.J. Impact of oxygen-containing surface functional groups on activated carbon adsorption of phenols. Environmental Science &Technology, 31(7), 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boehm H.P., Voll M. Carbon, 8: 227, 1970.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Papirer E., Li S., Donnet J.B. Carbon, 25(2): 243, 1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boehm H.P., Diehl E., Heck W., Sappok R. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 3(10): 669, 1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Garten V.A., Weiss D.E. Carbon, 22(1): 19, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leon C.A., Solar J.M., Calemma V., Radovic L.R. Carbon, 30(5): 797, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Puri B.R. In Chemistry and Physics of Carbon. New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huggins F.E., Yap N., Huffman G.P., Senior C.L. XAFS characterization of mercury captured from combustion gases on sorbents at low temperatures. Fuel Processing Technology, 82: 167–196, 2003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhou, J., Luo, Z., Zhu, Y., Fang, M. (2013). Mercury Control and Mercury Stability in Byproducts. In: Mercury Emission and its Control in Chinese Coal-Fired Power Plants. Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37874-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics