Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human Gender Differences in Cognitive Preferences Toward Attractive Faces in a Visual Oddball Paradigm: An ERP Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Foundations and Practical Applications of Cognitive Systems and Information Processing

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 215))

Abstract

In this study, employing event-related potential (ERP) in response to faces and object stimuli, we explored the temporal course of cognitive biases and sex differences for facial attractiveness during a visual oddball paradigm. 10 women and 10 men were confronted with this task, within which they were asked to point out, as fast as possible, rare attractive or unattractive faces of neutral expression among a series of frequent stimuli (neutral objects). Behavioral analyses showed that men yielded longer reaction times than women, and deviant attractive faces were detected more slowly compared with deviant unattractive ones only for men. In accordance with the behavioral results, the ERP results showed that with respect to women, the N2b peak latencies were prolonged for both attractive and unattractive faces in men, perhaps reflecting early implicit attention to distinctive faces. Thereafter, for both sexes, deviant attractive faces evoked greater P3b amplitudes in comparison to deviant unattractive faces, revealing the cognitive biases toward facial beauty. Importantly, only in men, the P3b peak latencies were longer for attractive faces as opposed to their unattractive counterparts. Thus, it is likely that sex differences found in the detection of facial attractiveness could begin quite early in the information processing mechanism. Moreover, from an evolutionary view, the ERP and behavioral evidence together confirmed a reasonable supposition that although both men and women showed processing preferences for attractive faces, compared with women, men might attribute more value to distinctive evolution-related cues, especially to attractive information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ohman A, Flykt A, Esteves F (2001) Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. J Exp Psychol Gen 130(3):466–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fox E, Russo R, Bowles R, Dutton K (2007) Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? J Exp Psychol Gen 130(4):681–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vuilleumier P (2005) How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends Cognitive Sci 9(12):585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aharon I, Etcoff N, Ariely D, Chabris CF, O’Connor E, Breiter HC (2001) Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron 32(3):537–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Doherty J, Winston J, Critchley H, Perrett D, Burt DM, Dolan RJ (2003) Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia 41(2):147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Senior C (2003) Beauty in the brain of the beholder. Neuron 38(4):525–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Halgren E et al (1994) Spatio-temporal stages in face and word processing. 2. Depth-recorded potentials in the human frontal and rolandic cortices. J Physiol Paris 88(1):51–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Campanella S, Gaspard C, Debatisse D, Bruyer R, Crommelinck M, Guerit J-M (2002) Discrimination of emotional facial expressions in a visual oddball task: an ERP study. Biol Psychol 59(3):171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston VS, Oliver-Rodriguez JC (1997) Facial beauty and the late positive component of event-related potentials. J Sex Res 34(2):188–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oliver-rodríguez JC, Guan Z, Johnston VS (1999) Gender differences in late positive components evoked by human faces. Psychophysiology 36(2):176–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marzi T, Viggiano MP (2010) When memory meets beauty: insights from event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 84(2):192–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Y et al (2011) Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: an event-related potential experiment using a study-test paradigm. J Neurosci Res 89(11):1887–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Langeslag SJ, Jansma BM, Franken IH, Van Strien JW (2007) Event-related potential responses to love-related facial stimuli. Biol Psychol 90(3):211–217

    Google Scholar 

  14. Werheid K, Schacht A, Sommer W (2007) Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials. Biol Psychol 76(1–2):100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schupp HT, Stockburger J, Bublatzky F, Junghöfer M, Weike AI, Hamm AO (2007) Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex. BMC Neurosci 8(1):16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carretié L, Hinojosa JA, Martín-Loeches M, Mercado F, Tapia M (2004) Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates. Hum Brain Mapp 22(4):290–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van Hooff JC, Crawford H, van Vugt M (2011) The wandering mind of men: erp evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces. Soc Cognitive Affect Neurosci 6(4):477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Campanella S et al (2004) Human gender differences in an emotional visual oddball task: an event-related potentials study. Neurosci Lett 367:14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oriental Face Database (OFD). http://www.aiar.xjtu.edu.cn/groups/face/Chinese/Homepage.htm

  20. Luck SJ (2005) Basic principles of ERP recording, in an introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 107

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson M, Daly M (2004) Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future? Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 271(4):S177–S179

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen A, Luo Y, Wang Q, Yuan J, Yao D, Li H (2007) Electrophysiological correlates of category induction: PSW amplitude as an index of identifying shared attributes. Biol Psychol 76(3):230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eimer M (2000) The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. NeuroReport 11(10):2319–2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Foti D, Hajcak G, Dien J (2009) Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. Psychophysiology 46(3):521–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schupp HT, Ohman A, Junghöfer M, Weike AI, Stockburger J, Hamm AO (2004) The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis. Emotion 4(2):189–200

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rhodes G (2006) The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol 57(1):199–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gur RC, Gunning-Dixon F, Bilker WB, Gur RE (2002) Sex differences in temporo-limbic and frontal brain volumes of healthy adults. Cereb Cortex 12(9):998–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wrase J (2003) Gender differences in the processing of standardized emotional visual stimuli in humans: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci Lett 348(1):41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Davidson RJ, Irwin W (1999) The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style. Trends Cognitive Sci 3(1):11–21

    Google Scholar 

  30. Buss DM, Schmitt DP (1993) Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol Rev 100(2):204–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grants No. 90820305 and No. 60775040. The authors are grateful to all subjects for their interest and participation as well as the Laboratory of Neural Engineering of Tsinghua University for offering the Neuroscan Synamps recording equipment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems, Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology, Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Zimu Zhang & Zhidong Deng

Authors
  1. Zimu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhidong Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zimu Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, People's Republic of China

    Fuchun Sun

  2. College of Mechatronics and Automation, National University of Defense Technolog, Changsha, People's Republic of China

    Dewen Hu

  3. Department of Computer Science and Techn, Tsinghua University, Beijing, People's Republic of China

    Huaping Liu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, Z., Deng, Z. (2014). Human Gender Differences in Cognitive Preferences Toward Attractive Faces in a Visual Oddball Paradigm: An ERP Study. In: Sun, F., Hu, D., Liu, H. (eds) Foundations and Practical Applications of Cognitive Systems and Information Processing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 215. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37835-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37835-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37834-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37835-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation