Skip to main content

Semantic Annotation for Textual Entailment Recognition

  • Conference paper
Advances in Computational Intelligence (MICAI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7630))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We introduce a new semantic annotation scheme for the Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) dataset as well as a manually annotated dataset that uses this scheme. The scheme addresses three types of modification that license entailment patterns: restrictive, appositive and conjunctive, with a formal semantic specification of these patterns’ contribution for establishing entailment. These inferential constructions were found to occur in 77.68% of the entailments in the RTE 1-3 corpora. They were annotated with cross-annotator agreement of 70.73% on average. A central aim of our annotations is to examine components that address these phenomena in RTE systems. Specifically, the new annotated dataset is used for examining a syntactic rule base within the BIUTEE recognizer, a publicly available entailment system. According to our tests, the rule base is rarely used to process the phenomena annotated in our corpus and most of the recognition work is done by other components in the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, C.F., Fillmore, C.J., Lowe, J.B.: The berkeley FrameNet project. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, ACL 1998, vol. 1, pp. 86–90. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bar Haim, R., Dagan, I., Dolan, B., Ferro, L., Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B., Szpektor, I.: The second pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In: Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bar-Haim, R., Dagan, I., Greental, I., Szpektor, I., Friedman, M.: Semantic inference at the lexical-syntactic level for textual entailment recognition. In: Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 131–136 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bayer, S., Burger, J., Ferro, L., Henderson, J., Yeh, E.: Mitres submission to the eu pascal rte challenge. In: Proc. of the First PASCAL Challenge Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, pp. 41–44 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bentivogli, L., Cabrio, E., Dagan, I., Giampiccolo, D., Leggio, M.L., Magnini, B.: Building textual entailment specialized data sets: a methodology for isolating linguistic phenomena relevant to inference. In: Proceedings of LREC 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bentivogli, L., Dagan, I., Dang, H.T., Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B.: The fifth pascal recognizing textual entailment challenge. Proceedings of TAC 9, 14–24 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chklovski, T., Pantel, P.: Verbocean: Mining the web for fine-grained semantic verb relations. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, vol. 4, pp. 33–40 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cunningham, H., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., Tablan, V., Aswani, N., Roberts, I., Gorrell, G., Funk, A., Roberts, A., Damljanovic, D., Heitz, T., Greenwood, M.A., Saggion, H., Petrak, J., Li, Y., Peters, W.: Text Processing with GATE, Version 6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dagan, I., Glickman, O., Magnini, B.: The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In: Quiñonero-Candela, J., Dagan, I., Magnini, B., d’Alché-Buc, F. (eds.) MLCW 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3944, pp. 177–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Del Gobbo, F.: On the syntax and semantics of appositive relative clauses. In: Dehe, N., Kavalova, Y. (eds.) Parentheticals, pp. 173–201 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Delmonte, R., Tonelli, S., Boniforti, M.A.P., Bristot, A., Pianta, E.: VENSES – A Linguistically-Based System for Semantic Evaluation. In: Quiñonero-Candela, J., Dagan, I., Magnini, B., d’Alché-Buc, F. (eds.) MLCW 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3944, pp. 344–371. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Language, Speech, and Communication. MIT Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giampiccolo, D., Dang, H.T., Magnini, B., Dagan, I., Cabrio, E.: The fourth pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In: TAC 2008 Proceedings (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B., Dagan, I., Dolan, B.: The third pascal recognizing textual entailment challenge. In: Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, RTE 2007, pp. 1–9. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Habash, N., Dorr, B.: A categorial variation database for english. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, vol. 1, pp. 17–23 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hickl, A., Williams, J., Bensley, J., Roberts, K., Rink, B., Shi, Y.: Recognizing textual entailment with LCCs GROUNDHOG system. In: Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hickl, A., Bensley, J.: A discourse commitment-based framework for recognizing textual entailment. In: Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 171–176 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iftene, A., Balahur-Dobrescu, A.: Hypothesis transformation and semantic variability rules used in recognizing textual entailment. In: Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 125–130 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Iftene, A.: Textual Entailment. Ph.D. thesis, ”Al. I. Cuza” University, Iasi, Romania (March 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, D.: Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 2, pp. 768–774 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lin, D., Pantel, P.: DIRT@ SBT@ discovery of inference rules from text. In: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 323–328 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lotan, A.: A Syntax-based Rule-base for Textual Entailment and a Semantic Truth Value Annotator. MA thesis, Department of Linguistics, Tel Aviv University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. de Marneffe, M.C., Manning, C.D.: The stanford typed dependencies representation. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation, Coling 2008, pp. 1–8 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. McCawley, J.D.: Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13(1), 91–106 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: a lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Perez, D., Alfonseca, E.: Application of the bleu algorithm for recognising textual entailments. In: Proceedings of the First Challenge Workshop Recognising Textual Entailment, pp. 9–12 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J.: A Comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman, London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sammons, M., Vydiswaran, V.G., Roth, D.: Ask not what textual entailment can do for you... In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1199–1208 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sells, P.: Restrictive and non-restrictive modification. CLSI Report, Center for the Study of Language and Information, vol. (28). Stanford University (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stern, A., Dagan, I.: A confidence model for syntactically-motivated entailment proofs. In: Proceedings of RANLP 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tatu, M., Iles, B., Slavick, J., Novischi, A., Moldovan, D.: Cogex at the second recognizing textual entailment challenge. In: Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, pp. 104–109 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tatu, M., Moldovan, D.: COGEX at RTE3. In: Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 22–27 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zanzotto, F.M., Moschitti, A., Pennacchiotti, M., Pazienza, M.T.: Learning textual entailment from examples. In: Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Toledo, A. et al. (2013). Semantic Annotation for Textual Entailment Recognition. In: Batyrshin, I., Mendoza, M.G. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. MICAI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7630. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37798-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37798-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37797-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37798-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics