Advertisement

Shunt Active Power Filter

  • Germán A. RamosEmail author
  • Ramon Costa-Castelló
  • Josep M. Olm
Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences book series (LNCIS, volume 446)

Summary

Shunt active power filters have been introduced as a way to overcome the power quality problems caused by nonlinear and reactive loads [9, 14, 23]. These power electronics devices are designed with the goal of obtaining a power factor close to 1 and achieving current harmonics and reactive power compensation [5, 6, 15]. The usual approaches [5, 15] for the control of shunt active filters are based on two hierarchical control loops: an inner one that assures the desired current and an outer one in charge of determining its required shape and the appropriate power balance as well. The control structure followed in this Chapter is the one in [7], in which the current controller is composed of a feedforward action that provides very fast transient response, and also of a feedback loop which includes an odd-harmonic repetitive control that yields closed-loop stability and a very good harmonic correction performance. In turn, the outer control law is based on the appropriated computation of the amplitude of the sinusoidal current network and, aiming at a robustness improvement, this is combined with a feedback control law including an analytically tuned PI controller.

Keywords

Robust Design Boost Converter Nonlinear Load Nominal Frequency Active Power Filter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ali, M., Tamura, J., Wu, B.: SMES strategy to minimize frequency fluctuations of wind generator system. In: 34th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics, IECON 2008, pp. 3382–3387 (November 2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Apkarian, P., Adams, R.: Advanced gain-scheduling techniques for uncertain systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 6(1), 21–32 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolik, S.: Modelling and Analysis of Variable Speed Wind Turbines with Induction Generator during Grid Fault. Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruijnen, D., van de Molengraft, M., Steinbuch, M.: Efficient IIR notch filter design via multirate filtering targeted at harmonic disturbance rejection. In: Proceedings of the 4th IFAC Symposium on Mechatronic Systems, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 318–323 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buso, S., Malesani, L., Mattavelli, P.: Comparison of current control techniques for active filters applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 45, 722–729 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corasaniti, V., Barbieri, M., Arnera, P., Valla, M.: Hybrid active filter for reactive and harmonics compensation in a distribution network. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 56(3), 670–677 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Costa-Castelló, R., Griñó, R., Cardoner Parpal, R., Fossas, E.: High-performance control of a single-phase shunt active filter. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 17(6), 1318–1329 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Datta, M., Senjyu, T., Yona, A., Funabashi, T., Kim, C.-H.: A frequency-control approach by photovoltaic generator in a pv-diesel hybrid power system. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 26(2), 559–571 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freijedo, F., Doval-Gandoy, J., Lopez, O., Fernandez-Comesana, P., Martinez-Penalver, C.: A signal-processing adaptive algorithm for selective current harmonic cancellation in active power filters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 56(8), 2829–2840 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fujioka, H.: Stability analysis for a class of networked-embedded control systems: A discrete-time approach. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 4997–5002 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galeani, S., Tarbouriech, S., Turner, M., Zaccarian, L.: A tutorial on modern anti-windup design. European Journal of Control 15, 418–440 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hippe, P.: Windup in Control: Its Effects and Their Prevention, 1st edn. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer (May 2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    IEC. Electromagnetic compatibility part 2-4: Environment compatibility levels in industrial plants for low-frequency conducted disturbances. IEC 6100-2-4:2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lascu, C., Asiminoaei, L., Boldea, I., Blaabjerg, F.: Frequency response analysis of current controllers for selective harmonic compensation in active power filters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 56(2), 337–347 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mattavelli, P.: A closed-loop selective harmonic compensation for active filters. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 37(1), 81–89 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ryu, Y.S., Longman, R.: Use of anti-reset windup in integral control based learning and repetitive control. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Humans, Information and Technology, vol. 3, pp. 2617–2622 (October 1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sala, A.: Computer control under time-varying sampling period: An LMI gridding approach. Automatica 41(12), 2077–2082 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sbarbaro, D., Tomizuka, M., de la Barra, B.L.: Repetitive control system under actuator saturation and windup prevention. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 131(4), 044505 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Songschon, S., Longman, R.W.: Comparison of the stability boundary and the frequency response stability condition in learning and repetitive control. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 13(2), 169–177 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suh, Y.S.: Stability and stabilization of nonuniform sampling systems. Automatica 44(12), 3222–3226 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Teodorescu, R., Liserre, M., Rodríguez, P.: Grid converters for photovoltaic and wind power systems. Adaptive and Learning Systems for Signal Processing, Communications and Control Series. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (August 2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    U C T E. Technical paper: Definition of a set of requirements to generating units (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Varschavsky, A., Dixon, J., Rotella, M., Moran, L.: Cascaded nine-level inverter for hybrid-series active power filter, using industrial controller. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 57(8), 2761–2767 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Germán A. Ramos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ramon Costa-Castelló
    • 2
  • Josep M. Olm
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversidad Nacional de Colombia BogotáColombia
  2. 2.Escola Tècnica Superior d’Enginyeria Industrial de Barcelona (ETSEIB)Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) BarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Applied Mathematics IV Universitat Politècnica de CatalunyaCastelldefelsSpain

Personalised recommendations