Skip to main content

Eliciting Altruism While Avoiding Xenophobia: A Thought Experiment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Extraterrestrial Altruism

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

Abstract

How do we convey our own altruism to extraterrestrials and how do we trigger altruism from them while avoiding their possible ethnocentrism or even xenophobia? The answer depends on the evolutionary processes that produced a species with which we can communicate. Only a social, internally cooperative, culture-bearing species is likely to have the necessary high technology. Many species use tools but this does not guarantee them a capacity for advanced technology without an evolutionary amplification process. The three candidate processes are: (1) self-predation; (2) co-predation, that is, rivalry with one or more other tool-using species; and (3) sexual selection. Self-predation, in which competing bands cull one another of the dull and uncooperative, likely featured in our own evolutionary history. It leads to a species capable of altruism, alliance, and ethnocentrism and which is likely to share our ideas of social exchange and fairness. Co-predation, in which competing species engage in comparable culling of one another, could lead to a tendency towards xenophobia. These extraterrestrials may be scanning for enemies rather than looking for friends. In sexual selection, males and females mate preferentially with the most intelligent, cooperative, and successful. In such sexually selected species, art functions as a display of superior health and genes in a potential mate. Species with a history of sexual selection are likely to produce art and to recognize and respect our own. The practical implication of this analysis is that, though the risk is no doubt very low, it could be unwise to communicate information that would demonstrate to xenophobes that we are an alien species. Instead, we could communicate our art and music, along with scientific knowledge, because doing so is safe, conveys similarity, and is likely to elicit an altruistic response from any species whose intelligence was produced by either self-predation or by sexual selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Before there were xenobiologists there were science fiction writers. See, for example, Hal Clement’s 1954 classic, Mission of Gravity (Clement 1954).

  2. 2.

    For an introduction to evolutionary psychology, see Buss (2012).

  3. 3.

    I am assuming that extraterrestrials will have two sexes. Evolutionary biologists have concluded that having two sexes gives plants and animals an adaptive advantage in coevolutionary competition with parasites whose generational period is much shorter and which therefore can evolve more rapidly. For discussion and research, see Brockhurst (2011), Morran et al. (2011), or Ridley (1993).

References

  • Alexander, Richard D. 1971. “The Search for an Evolutionary Philosophy of Man.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 84:99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Richard D. 1974. “The Evolution of Social Behavior.” Annual Review of Systematics 5:325–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Richard D. 1975. “The Search for a General Theory of Behavior.” Behavioral Science 20:77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Richard D. 1979. Darwinism and Human Affairs. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Richard D. 1987. The Biology of Moral Systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, Jerome H. 1989. Darwin, Sex, and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, Jerome H. 2000. “Do Extraterrestrials Have Sex (and Intelligence)?” In Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Reproductive Behavior, edited by Dori LeCroy and Peter Moller, 164–181. New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, Jerome H., Rick O’Gorman, and Luke Rendell. 2012. “Are The New Mass Media Subverting Cultural Transmission?” Review of General Psychology 16(2):121–133. doi:10.1037/a0027907.

  • Brockhurst, Michael A. 2011. “Sex, Death, and the Red Queen.” Science 333 (6039):166–167. doi:10.1126/science.1209420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, David M. 1989. “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(1):1–14. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00023992.

  • Buss, David M. 2012. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, E. 2001. “Ethnocentrism and Xenophobia: A Cross-Cultural Study.” Current Anthropology 42 (5):760–765. doi:10.1086/323821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, Hal. 1954. Mission of Gravity. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon 1998. The Crucible of Creation: The Burgess Shale and the Rise of Animals. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris, Simon 2003. Life’s Solution : Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, Leda, and John Tooby. 2006. “Evolutionary Psychology, Moral Heuristics, and the Law.” In Heuristics and the Law (Dahlem Workshop Reports), edited by Gerd Gigerenzer and Christoph Engel, 175–205. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (in cooperation with Dahlem University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, Helena. 1992. The Ant and the Peacock: Altruism and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, Frank, and Dava Sobel. 1992. Is Anyone out There? The Scientific Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. New York: Delacorte Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., and K. Hill. 2009. “Why Do Men Hunt?: A Reevaluation of ‘Man the Hunter’ and the Sexual Division of Labor.” Current Anthropology 50(1):51–74. doi:10.1086/595620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., and R. B. Bird. 2002. “Showing Off, Handicap Signaling, and the Evolution of Men’s Work.” Evolutionary Anthropology 11(2):58–67. doi:10.1002/evan.20005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, Robert, Peter DeScioli, and Daniel Fein. 2012. “Hamilton Vs. Kant: Pitting Adaptations for Altruism Against Adaptations for Moral Judgment.” Evolution and Human Behavior 33(4):323–333. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.11.002.

  • LeVine, Robert A., and Donald T. Campbell. 1972. Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes and Group Behavior. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Geoffrey. 2000. The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped Human Nature. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Geoffrey. 2009. Spent: Sex, Evolution, and Consumer Behavior. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morran, Levi T., Olivia G. Schmidt, Ian A. Gelarden, Raymond C. Parrish, and Curtis M. Lively. 2011. “Running with the Red Queen: Host-Parasite Coevolution Selects for Biparental Sex.” Science 333(6039):216–218. doi:10.1126/science.1206360.

  • Oakley, Kenneth Page. 1952. Man The Toolmaker. 2nd ed. London: British Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds V., Falger V., and Vine I., eds. 1987. The Sociobiology of Ethnocentrism. Evolutionary Dimensions of Xenophobia, Discrimination, Racism and Nationalism. London and Sydney: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, Matt. 1993. The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad, Gad. 2007. The Evolutionary Bases of Consumption. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad, Gad. 2011. The Consuming Instinct: What Juicy Burgers, Ferraris, Pornography, and Gift Giving Reveal about Human Nature. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, Ian. 2012. Masters of the Planet: The Search for Our Human Origins. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berghe, Pierre. 1981. The Ethnic Phenomenon. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Anthony. 2000. “Evolutionary Psychology and the Origins of Justice.” Justice Quarterly 17(4):841–864. doi:10.1080/07418820000094781.

  • Whiten, Andrew, and David Erdal. 2012. “The Human Socio-Cognitive Niche and Its Evolutionary Origins.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367(1599):2119–2129. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0114.

  • Zahavi, Amotz, and Avishag Zahavi. 1997. The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerome H. Barkow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barkow, J.H. (2014). Eliciting Altruism While Avoiding Xenophobia: A Thought Experiment. In: Vakoch, D. (eds) Extraterrestrial Altruism. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37750-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37750-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37749-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37750-1

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics