Abstract
We present a fragment of predicate logic which allows the use of equality and quantification but whose models are limited to finite Herbrand interpretations. Formulae in this logic can be thought as syntactic sugar on top of the Bernays-Schönfinkel fragment and can, therefore, still be effectively grounded into a propositional representation. We motivate the study of this logic by showing that practical problems from the area of planning can be naturally and succinctly represented using the added syntactic features. Moreover, from a theoretical point of view, we show that this logic allows, when compared to the propositional approach, not only more compact encodings but also exponentially shorter refutation proofs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baaz, M., Leitsch, A.: Complexity of resolution proofs and function introduction. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 57(3), 181–215 (1992)
Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H.: Resolution theorem proving. In: Robinson, J.A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, vol. I, ch. 2, pp. 19–99. Elsevier (2001)
Baumgartner, P., Tinelli, C.: The Model Evolution Calculus with Equality. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (ed.) CADE 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3632, pp. 392–408. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Claessen, K., Sörensson, N.: New techniques that improve MACE-style model finding. In: MODEL 2003: Proceedings of the Workshop on Model Computation (2003)
Fikes, R., Nilsson, N.J.: STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 2, 189–208 (1971)
Ganzinger, H., Korovin, K.: Theory Instantiation. In: Hermann, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4246, pp. 497–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Green, C.: Application of theorem proving to problem solving. In: IJCAI 1969: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 219–239 (1969)
Haas, A.R.: The case for domain specific frame axioms. In: Brown, F.M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1987 Workshop on The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 343–348. Morgan Kaufmann, Lawrence (1987)
Kautz, H., Selman, B.: Planning as satisfiability. In: ECAI 1992: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 359–363. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Vienna (1992)
Kautz, H., McAllester, D., Selman, B.: Encoding plans in propositional logic. In: KR 1996: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Boston, MA, USA (1996)
Navarro Pérez, J.A.: Encoding and Solving Problems in Effectively Propositional Logic. PhD thesis, The University of Manchester (2007)
Navarro-Pérez, J.A., Voronkov, A.: Encodings of Bounded LTL Model Checking in Effectively Propositional Logic. In: Pfenning, F. (ed.) CADE 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4603, pp. 346–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
David, A.: Plaisted and Steven Greenbaum. A structure-preserving clause form translation. Journal of Symbolic Computation 2(3), 747–7171 (1986) ISSN: 0747-7171
Schubert, L.K.: Monotonic solution of the frame problem in the situation calculus: An efficient method for worlds with fully specified actions. In: Kyburg, H., Loui, R., Carlson, G. (eds.) Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning, pp. 23–67. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1990)
Sutcliffe, G.: The TPTP problem library and associated infrastructure: The FOF and CNF parts, v3.5.0. Journal of Automated Reasoning 43(4), 337–362 (2009)
Sutcliffe, G., Suttner, C.B.: The state of CASC. AI Communications 19(1), 35–48 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Navarro-Pérez, J.A., Voronkov, A. (2013). Planning with Effectively Propositional Logic. In: Voronkov, A., Weidenbach, C. (eds) Programming Logics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7797. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37651-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37651-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37650-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37651-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)