Skip to main content

To the Roots of Entrepreneurial Values: The Relationship with the Territory as a Driver for the Development of Corporate Social Responsibility—An Analysis of the Experiences of Italian SMEs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Business World

Abstract

The aim of this study is to propose a reflection on the contribution of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in spreading the philosophy and practices of governance directed towards Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as well as sustainability. The study focuses on the importance of entrepreneurial values as well as on the relationship with the territory, to which the entrepreneurs and SMEs are profoundly rooted. Sharing a system of common values which arises from a whole range of intangible context (social, anthropological, cultural) factors, specific to location, contributes to build a favourable business climate wherein the SMEs, together with other local actors, take part in constructing sustainable company and territory strategies. After presenting the theoretical framework the second section of the paper is developed by way of a qualitative research methodology centered upon the analysis of a sample of SMEs belonging to the Marche region, Italian territory “cradle” of the small-sized company and craft traditions. Using a cognitive approach, the study permits identifying the “roots” of good entrepreneurial practices and to trace the features of a territorial model of socially-responsible orientation based on excellent examples of “convivial enterprises” strongly rooted in their territories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Based on empirical research conducted between 2005 and 2006 on a sample of 51 SMEs from diverse European countries the Authors distinguished three categories of businesses: “the business strategy enterprises”, which are making a conscious effort to implement CSR and have adopted CSR as a part of their business strategy; “the intuitive enterprises”, which are “doing” CSR without having made a conscious decision to do so—their normal business practices coincide with CSR indicators; “the raison d’être enterprises”, which are “doing” CSR because it coincides with their business concept, i.e. the actual business concept is philanthropic” (Kvåle and Olsen 2006: 7).

  2. 2.

    Molteni and Lucchini (2004) identify a typology of orientations among Italian firms, based on two coordinates (intensity of the phenomenon—i.e. the socially responsible behavior—and qualitative aspects linked to the practice and to corporate behavior): cohesive firms, multi-certified, aware, able to be mobilised, skeptical.

References

  • Adams, C. (2002). Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 47(15), 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25(4), 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnasco, A. (1977). Tre Italie: La problematica territoriale dello sviluppo italiano. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldarelli, M. G. (2005). Le aziende eticamente orientate. Mission, Governance e Accountability. Bologna: Clueb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balloni, V., & Trupia, P. (Eds.) (2005). Origine, caratteristiche e sviluppo dell’imprenditorialità nelle Valli dell’Esino e del Misa. Ancona: Ed. Conerografia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia, M., Campi, S., Frey, M., & Iraldo, F. (2006). A ‘Cluster’ Approach for the Promotion of CSR among SMEs. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G. (1979). Mercato e forze sociali: il distretto industriale. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, X. V. I. (2009). Caritas in Veritate. Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1979). Civiltà materiale, economia e capitalismo (secolo XV-XVIII) (Vol. III). Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L. (2007). La ferita dell’altro. Economia e relazioni umane. Trento: Il Margine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (Eds.). (2005). Happiness and Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L., & Zamagni, S. (2004). Economia civile. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrol, A. B. (1994). Social Issues in Management Research. Business and Society, 33(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castka, P., Balzarova, M. A., Bomber, C. J., & Sharp, J. M. (2004). How can SMEs effectively implement the CSR agenda? A UK case study perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(3), 140–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catturi, G. (2003). Valori etici e principi economici: equilibrio possibile. Studi e Note di Economia, 3, 7–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catturi, G. (2006). Potere aziendale e responsabilità socio-politica. In G. Rusconi & M. Dorigatti (Eds.), Impresa e responsabilità sociale. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, N. V., & Lewis, V. L. (1983). The Five Stages of Small Business Growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, C. M. (1990). Storia economica dell’Europa pre-industriale. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coda, V. (1985). Valori imprenditoriali e successo dell’impresa. Finanza, Marketing e Produzione, 2, 23–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J., & Porras, J. I. (1991). Organizational vision and visionary organizations. California Management Review Fall, 34(1), 30–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S. N. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how. California Management Review, 45(4), 52–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Baldo, M. (2006a). Piccoli imprenditori e piccole imprese socialmente responsabili. In University of Padua (Ed.) Scritti in onore di Isa Marchini. Milano: Franco Angeli, 329–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Baldo, M. (2006b). SMEs and corporate social responsibility. Some evidences from an empirical research. In Proceedings of the Emerging Issues in International Accounting & Business Conference 2006, vol. 1. Padua: University of Padua, July 20–22, 314–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2002). European SMEs and social and environmental responsibility’, 7th observatory of european SMEs, 4. Belgium: Enterprise Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2004). European Multistakeholder Forum on CSR: Report of the Round Table on Fostering CSR among SMEs. EC: Brussels, final version 3 May 2005, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuà, G., & Zacchia, C. (Eds.). (1983). Industrializzazione senza fratture. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugazza, S., Pandini, L., Gostner von Stefenelli, C., & Equalitas. (2006). Interreg 3A Project. A Model for the Development of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Province of Bolzano. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovanni Paolo, I. I. (1991). Centesimus Annus. Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui, B., & Sugden, R. (2005). Economics and social interactions. Accounting for interpersonal relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B., Van Luijk, H., & Corbetta, G. (1991). Market morality and company size. London: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences. International Differences in Work-related Values. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006a). A ‘Business opportunity’ model of corporate social responsibility for small and medium sized enterprises. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference,Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006b). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kromminga, P., & Dresewski, F. (2006). Promoting CSR Among SMEs: Experiences from Germany. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvåle, G., & Olsen, T. S. (2006). Variations in CSR in SMEs in five European countries. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, G. (2002). The spirited business: Success stories of soul friendly companies. London: Hoddes and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leborgne, D., & Lipietz, A. (1991). Two social strategies in the production of new industrial spaces. In G. Benko & M. Dunford (Eds.), Industrial Change and Regional Development: The Transformation of New Industrial Spaces. London: Pinter Publisher-Belhaven Press, 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepoutre, J. (2006). Capabilities for effectively executing socially responsible strategies in small businesses. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetkenhorst, W. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the development Agenda - the case for actively involving small and medium enterprises. Intereconomics, Review of European Economic Policy, 39(3), 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maaß, F. (2006). Integrating corporate citizenship into corporate strategy: Empirical evidence on SMEs in Germany. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandl, I. (2006). CSR and Competitiveness—European SMEs Good Practice. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference.Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchini, I. (1995). Il governo della piccola impresa. vol. II—La gestione strategica. Genova: Aspi/Ins-Edit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matacena, A. (2008). Responsabilità sociale delle imprese e accountability: alcune glosse. Rimini: Diapason.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matacena, A., & Del Baldo, M. D. (Eds.). (2009). Responsabilità sociale d’impresa e territorio. L’esperienza delle piccole e medie imprese marchigiane. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Implicit and explicit CSR. A conceptual framework to understand CSR in Europe. ICCSR Research paper series, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1965). Need of achievement and entrepreneurship. A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 89–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minguzzi, A., & Passaro, R. (2000). The network of relationship between the economic environment and the entrepreneurial culture in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 181–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minoja, M., & Romano, G. (2006). Managing Turnaround with Responsible Entrepreneurship: the Kendrion Case. Paper presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molteni, M., & Lucchini, M. (2004). I modelli di responsabilità sociale nelle imprese italiane. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molteni, M., Antoldi, F., & Todisco, A. (2006). SMEs and corporate social responsibility: An empirical survey in Italian industrial district. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molteni, M., Pedrini, M., & Bertolini, S. (2006b). La responsabilità sociale nelle aziende familiari italiane. Milano: Aidaf, ISVI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M. (2006). Drivers of corporate social responsibility in SMEs. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niccolini, F. (2008). Responsabilità sociale e competenze organizzative distintive. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2006). CSR in small and medium sized enterprises (SME’s): A holistic and strategic approach to the communication with the stakeholders. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ørskov, E. (2006). Green Network—a Showcase for Working with CSR in SMEs. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolo VI (1967). Populorum Progressio. Bologna: Centro Ed. Dehoniane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peraro, F., & Vecchiato, G. (2007). Responsabilità sociale del territorio. Manuale operativo di sviluppo sostenibile e best practices. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. (2006). Towards a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., Pogutz, S., & Tencati, A. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Italy: State of the art. Journal of Business Strategies, 23(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringov, D., & Zollo, M. (2007). Corporate responsibility from a socio-institutional perspective. The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 476–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2006). Formal vs Informal CSR strategies. The case of Italian SMEs. Paper Presented at the EABIS/CBS International Conference, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 26 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1990). Cultura d’azienda e leadership. Milano: Guerini e Associati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J. (1999). Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(3), 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., & Lozano, J. F. (2000). Communicating about ethics with small firms: Experiences from the U.K. and Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). Small business and empirical perspectives in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., & Schmidpeter, R. (2003). SMEs, social capital and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1/2), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., Jeurissen, R., & Rutherfoord, R. (2000). Small business and the environment in the UK and the Netherlands: Toward stakeholder cooperation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(4), 945–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanworth, J., & Curran, J. (1973). Management Motivation in Smaller Business. Aldershot: Gower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economics, Ten years later: The region as a nexus of Intraded Interdepencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2, 191–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. K., & Smith, H. L. (1991). Social responsibility and small business: Suggestion for research. Journal of Small Business Management, 29, 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyakarnam, S., Bailey, A., Myers, A., & Burnett, D. (1997). Towards an understanding of ethical behaviour in small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(15), 1625–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unioncamere. (2003). Models of corporate social responsibility in Italy. Executive Summary. Rome: Italian Union of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Craft and Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni, S. (Ed.). (1995). The economics of altruism. Hants: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni, S. (2007). L’economia del bene comune. Roma: Città Nuova.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Del Baldo Mara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mara, D.B. (2014). To the Roots of Entrepreneurial Values: The Relationship with the Territory as a Driver for the Development of Corporate Social Responsibility—An Analysis of the Experiences of Italian SMEs. In: Yüksel Mermod, A., O.Idowu, S. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Business World. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37620-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics