Skip to main content

Validating the Model of Predictors of Academic Self-Handicapping Behavior

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2012 Conference Proceeding

Abstract

The main aim of the present study is to validate the model of predictors of self-handicapping behavior (POASH) on the data derived from undergraduate students in an ongoing co-curriculum compulsory course. The study adapted and extended the original theory of reciprocal interaction of emotion, cognition and behavior by adding self-handicapping behavior component. In so doing, this study assessed the direct and indirect effects of emotion, cognition and behavior via student engagement on self-handicapping behavior. The second purpose of the study is to evaluate gender and nationality status invariants of the causal structure of POASH. This cross-validation procedure determined whether gender and nationality status moderated the causal structure of the model, and thus the generality of POASH. The data was collected from two self-reported questionnaires administered to 790 undergraduates of an International Islamic University in Malaysia. A confirmatory three-step approach theory testing and development using Maximum Likelihood method was applied. The results of structured equation modeling supported the adequacy of POASH and the causal structure of POASH proved to be applicable to both genders and nationality statuses.

Major Part of Thesis to be submitted in Confirmatory with the Requirements For the degree of Doctor of PhilosophyInstitute of Education, Department of Counseling and Psychology International Islamic University Malaysia

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abu Samah, B. (2012). Structural equation modeling (SEM): Using AMOS. Department of Professional Development and Continuing Education. Faculty of Educational Studies. Universiti Putra Malaysia. Serdang, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qayyim, I. I. (2003). Healing with the medicine of the prophet (pp. 177–180). Edited by: Abdul Rahman Abdullah Formarly Manderola R. J. Riyadh Saudi Arabia: Darussalaam Publishers & Distributers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qayyim, I. I. (2004). Alfawâ’id: A collection of wise sayings (Translation of Shafiq bin Ibrahim bin Aly Al-Azdy Al-Balkhy, p. 295). Al-Mansura: Umm Al-Qura for Translation, Publishing and Distributions.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and scientific manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text Revision). Washington, DC: Library of Congress Cataloging-in Publication Data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood, a 21st century theory: A Rejoinder to Henry and Kloep. Society for Research in Child Development, 1(2), 80–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baba, S. (2010). Lecture notes on Islamization of knowledge. International Islamic University Malaysia. Gombak, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badri, M. B. (2009). Interview session between a PhD counseling students and Malik Badri. Institute of Education, IIUM, KL Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. W., Bochow, T. W., Talamo, J. H., & D’Amico, D. J. (1996). Measurement and modelling of thermal transients during Er:YAG laser irradiation of vitreous. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 19(4), 388–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Cohen B. P., & Zelditch, M. (1972) In Berger J., & Zelditch M. (2002). New directions in contemporary sociological theory (p. 69). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed., pp. 5, 53–160). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey, G. (1996). Theories and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (5th ed., pp. 134–135). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 317–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey, G. (2013). Theory and practice of counseling therapy (9th ed., pp. 263–300). Belmont: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Counsel for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS). (1999). The role of counseling programs: CAS standards contextual statement. Washington, DC: CAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2005a). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (pp. 509–515). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2005b). Practical action research. In Educational research – planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (pp. 41, 324–349, 354, 552–555). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. In Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawry, M. (2006). Counseling and psychotherapy with Arabs and Muslims: A culturally sensitive approach (p. 58). New York: Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolcos, F., Iordan, A. D., & Dolcos, S. (2011). Neural correlates of emotion-cognition interactions: A review of evidence from brain imaging investigations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(6), 669–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drevets, W., & Raichle, M. (1998). Reciprocal cerebral blood flow during emotional versus higher cognitive processes. Cognitive and Emotion, 12(3), 353–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1993a) In Corey, G. (2013 & 1996). Theories and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (9th ed., pp. 267–286 and 5th ed., pp. 317–357). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1993b) In Corey, G. (1996). Theory and practice of counseling therapy (5th ed., pp. 317–359). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2001a). Feeling better, getting better, and staying better. Atascadero, CA: Impact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2001b). Overcoming destructive beliefs, feelings, and behaviors. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2002). Overcoming resistance: A rational emotive behavior therapy integrated approach (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2011). Rational emotive behavioral therapy. In R. Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.), Current psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., & Dryden, W. (2007). The practice of rationale behavior therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. In Corey, G. (2013) Theory and practice of counseling therapy (5th ed., pp. 63–66). New York: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton, New York, 1968. Science, 161(3838), 257–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, K. A. (2006). Quantifying school engagement: Research report. National Center for School Engagement. c/o Colorado Foundation for Families and Children. Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornel, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J., Blumenfel, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential concept, state of evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2005). Using SPSS for windows and Mackintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (4th ed., pp. 273–297). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, S. M. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of un-modeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2(3), 233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R. L., Snyder, C. R., & Berglas, S. (1990). Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn’t. In A. S. R Manstead & M. Hewstone (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of social psychology (p. 515). New York: Plenum. Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Research Institute (2002). Cooperative institutional Research Program (CIRP). Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honora, D., & Rolle, A. (2002). A discussion of incongruence between optimism and academicperformance and its influence on school violence. Journal of School Violence, 1(1), The Haworth Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structure equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 1–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, K. (2006). Living psychology (pp. 340–345). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, M. B. (2011). Lecture notes on statistics. International Islamic University Malaysia Gombak KL, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. L., & Butman, R. E. (1991). Modern psychotherapies: A comprehensive Christian appraisal (p. 145). Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1981). Introduction. In A. Kenneth, J. Bollen, & S. Long (1993) (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, V. (2006). Structured observation. In Sage dictionary of social research methods. ISBN: 970857020116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R.B. (2005) Principle and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolditz, T. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1982). An impression management interpretation of the self- handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 492–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J., & Buss, D. V. (2008). Personality psychology: Domains of knowledge about human nature (3rd ed., p. 109). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotkowski, V. A., Robbins, S. B., & Noeth, R. J. (2004). The role of academic and non- academic factors in improving college retention: Act policy report. Lowa City: ACT Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucus, J. W., & Lovaglia, M. J. (2005). Self-handicapping: Gender, race, and status. Current Research in Social Psychology, 10(15), 234–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. The American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and performance goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad Taqî-ud-Dîn al-Hîlalî & Muhammad MuhsinKhân. (1426 A.H.) Translation of the Noble Qur’an in the English language. King Fahd complex for the printing of the Holy Qur’ân. Madinah, K.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for School Engagement (2006). Quantifying school engagement: Research report. Promoting attendance, attachment and achievement, Colorado Foundations for Families and Children, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, F. M. (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American schools. New York: Teachers College Press. www.getcited.org/pub/102987053.

  • Newman, L., & Wadas, R. (1997). When stakes are higher: Self-esteem instability ans self- handicapping. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordin, M. S. (2011 & 2012). Lecture notes on structural equation modeling. International Islamic University Malaysia, Gombak KL, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norem, J., & Canter, N. (1986). Anticipatory and post hoc cushioning strategies: Optimism and defensive pessimism in “risky” situations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurius, P. S., & Cormier, S. (2003). Interviewing and change strategies for helpers: Fundamental skills and cognitive behavioral interventions (5th ed., p. 255). Australia: Thomson Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, J. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11, 1–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (pp. 142–159). Australia: Allen &Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, P. B. (1997). Culture centered counseling: Striving for accuracy. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, P. B. (2007). Ethics, competence and professional issues in cross-cultural counseling 01-Pederson.qxd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 153. In Improving public health prevention with behavioral cognitive science. Report handed to Nathaniel Kosciusko-Morizet, Secretary of State for Strategic Planning and the Development of the Digital Economy. Center for Strategic Analysis 18, rue de Martignac – 757000 Paris cedex 07. www.strategie.gouv.fr

  • Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis. ThousandOaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. (1993). A status base model of market competition. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poldony, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Social networks and mobility. American Sociological Review, 62, 673–693. In Kim, H. H. (2001). Social capital, embedded status, and the endorsement effect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, R. (2000). Practical statistics for educators (2nd ed.). New York: University Press of America, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F. (1990). Self-handicappers: Individual differences in the preference for anticipatory, self-protective acts. In H. Raymond, C. R. Snyder, & B. Steven (Eds.), Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn’t (pp. 69–106). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F. (1994). Conceptions of ability, achievement goals, and individual differences in self-handicapping behavior: On the application of implicit theories. Journal of Personality, 62, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F., & Davison, J. (1986). Self-handicapping and subsequent performance: Role of outcome valance and attribution certainty. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigdon, E. E. (1998). Structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 251–294). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roebken, H. (2007). The influence of goal orientation on student satisfaction, academic engagement and achievement. Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, N. 13 5(3), 679–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. R., Canada, K. E., & Rausch, M. K. (2002). Selfhandicapping and the five factor model of personality: Mediation between neuroticism and conscientiousness. Personality and Individual Difference, 32(7), 1173–1184. doi:10 1016/S011-8869(01) 00079–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, W., & Rivers, J. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement (Research progress report). University of Tennessee Value Added Assessment Center, Knoxville, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Maier, S. F. (1967). Failure to escape traumatic shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1998). The effectiveness of therapy. APA Monitor, 29, 5. Retrieved December 13, 2004, from www.apa.org/monitor/may98/pc.html.

  • Showers, C. (1992). The motivation and emotional consequences of considering positive or negative possibilities for an upcoming event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 474–483 (Scheier and Carver, 1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, M. (2007). Editorial: A guide to understanding theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Evidenced Based Midewifery, 5(2), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., Sinclair, K. E., & Chapman, E. S. (2002). Students’ goals, self-efficacy, self- handicapping, and negative affective responses: An Australian Senior School Student Study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 471–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R. (1990). Self-handicapping process and sequelae: On the taking of a psychological dive. In R. L. Higgins, C. R. Snyder, & S. Berglas (Eds.), Self- handicapping: The paradox that isn’t (pp. 107–150). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1980). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Study Circle Guidelines, Co-Curricular Activity Center, Student Development Division. International Islamic University Malaysia, KL, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2003). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley and sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1989). A general coefficient of determinant for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. L. (2007). Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). In Sharf, R. S. (2011). Theories of psychotherapy and counseling concepts and cases (p. 358). Books on Google Play, GANGAGE Learning, GengageBrain.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, G. S. (1998). A study of self-concept as it relates to academic achievement and gender in third grade students. A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts Degree in the Graduate Division of Rowan University, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, D. H. (1998). Learned helplessness. University of Pennsylvania Learned Helplessness Homepage Course. yen@noogenessis.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yick, A. G. (2000). Predictors of physical spousal/intimate violence in Chinese American families. Journal of Family Violence, 15(3), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. L. M., Fielding, R., Chan, C. L. W., Tse, V. K. C., Choi, P. H. K., Lau, W. H., Choy, D. T. K., O, S. K., Lee, A. W. M., & Sham, J. S. T. (2000). Measuring quality of life of Chinese cancer patients. A validation of the Chinese version of the functional assessment of cancer. Cancer, 88(7), 1715–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Kieffer, S. C., & Knee, C. R. (1998). Consequences of self-handicapping: Effects on coping, academic performance, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1619–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hafsa Mzee Mwita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mwita, H.M., Nordin, M.S., Ibrahim, M.B. (2013). Validating the Model of Predictors of Academic Self-Handicapping Behavior. In: Zhang, Q., Yang, H. (eds) Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2012 Conference Proceeding. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37592-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics