Skip to main content

Comparing Students’ Citizenship Concepts with Likert-Scale

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2012 Conference Proceeding
  • 668 Accesses

Abstract

The main concern in this article has been to investigate whether Hong Kong students’ citizenship concepts changed over a 10 year period. Such a methodology based on analyzing responses to the Likert scale was chosen to (1) provide precise results that make valid and reliable conclusions and (2) demonstrate that while an underlying latent trait reflecting democratic values can be identified in the two cohorts of students studied, that the latent trait did undergo subtle changes. This was reflected in the movement (or lack of it) of items along the latent trait. What is known is that Hong Kong students 10 years after the return of Hong Kong to China have strong commitments to democracy: what are less certain about is exactly how this situation developed but perhaps more importantly in the light of the results of this study, how it can be sustained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. G., & King, J. A. (2003). Measuring client satisfaction with public education II: Comparing schools with state benchmarks. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 258–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (1995). Prioritizing misfit indicators. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9(2), 422–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2008). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS MINISTEP Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago: Winsteps.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2009). WINSTEPS (version 3.69.1.7) [computer software]. Chicago: Winsteps.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. (2001). School instructional program coherence: Benefits and challenges. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W., & Sibberns, H. (Eds.). (2004). IEA Civic Education Study technical report. Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Chow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Item no.

Item name

A1

When everyone has the right to express their opinions freely, that is

A2

When differences in income wealth between the rich poor are small, that is

A3

When political leaders in power give jobs in the government [public sector] to members of their family, that is

A4

When newspapers are free of all government [state, political] control, that is

A5

When private businesses have no restrictions from government, that is

A6

When one company owns all the newspapers, that is

A7

When people demand their political and social rights, that is

A8

When immigrants are expected to give up the language and customs of their former countries, that is

A9

When political parties have rules that support women to become political leaders, that is

A10

When people who are critical of the government are forbidden from speaking at public meetings that is

A11

When citizens have the right to elect political leaders freely, that is

A12

When courts and judges are influenced by politicians, that is

A13

When many different organisations [associations] are available [exist] for people who wish to belong to them, that is

A14

When there is a separation [segregation] between the church [institutional church] and the state [government], that is

A15

When young people have an obligation [are obliged] to participate in activities to benefit [help] the community [society], that is

A16

When a minimum income [living standard] is assured for everyone, that is

A17

When political parties have different opinions [positions] on important issues, that is

A18

When people participate in political parties in order to influence government, that is

A19

When laws that women claim are unfair to them are changed, that is

A20

When all the television stations present the same opinion about politics, that is

A21

When people refuse to obey a law which violates human rights, that is

A22

When newspapers are forbidden to publish stories that might offend ethnic groups [immigrant groups, racial groups, national groups], that is

A23

When wealthy business people have more influence on government than others, that is

A24

When government leaders are trusted without question, that is

A25

When people peacefully protest against a law they believe to be unjust, that is

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chow, J. (2013). Comparing Students’ Citizenship Concepts with Likert-Scale. In: Zhang, Q., Yang, H. (eds) Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2012 Conference Proceeding. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37592-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics