Abstract
This paper reports an ongoing research project, which investigates the two competing hypotheses: whether inefficient lexical access (LA) and small working memory (WM) inhibit text comprehension in FL reading (inhibition hypothesis) or whether readers could use strategies to compensate for processing and language problems so that text comprehension are not influenced much (compensation hypothesis). Four hundred and two Chinese university students in their second year participated in the study. The larger project adopted a mix-method design collecting both quantitative and qualitative data, but the focus of the presentation is only on the quantitative data. The reading text were analyzed using RUMM2030 for both checking both misfitting items and persons. The data were then analyzed by doing correlation analyses between LA, WM and reading comprehension in two reading conditions: untimed reading and timed reading. Firstly, there was no significant correlation between students’ LA and reading comprehension in untimed reading condition (r = −.09, p = .07), whereas a small and negative relationship was found between LA and reading comprehension in timed reading (r = −.22, p < .01). Secondly, WM showed to be correlated positively with students’ reading comprehension in both untimed (r = .11, p < .05) and timed reading conditions (r = .20, p < .01), both the values of correlation were small. The magnitude of correlation between WM and comprehension in untimed reading was smaller than that between WM and comprehension in timed reading. The preliminary results from the quantitative data seem to support the compensation hypothesis that when readers are allowed sufficient time, inefficient word processing and small working memory do not inhibit text comprehension in FL reading.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, M. J. (1999). Afterword: The science and politics of beginning reading practices. In J. Oakhill & R. Beard (Eds.), Reading development and the teaching of reading (pp. 213–227). Oxford: Blackwell.
Brantmeier, C. (2005). Effects of reader’s knowledge, text type, and test type on L1 and L2 reading comprehension in Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 37–53.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 116–124.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow: Longman.
Haynes, M., & Carr, T. H. (1990). Writing system background and second language reading: A component skills analysis of English reading by native speaker-readers of Chinese. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 375–421). San Diego: Academic.
Koda, K. (1992). The effects of lower-level processing skills on FL reading performance: Implications for instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 502–512.
Malarcher, C. (2005). College reading workshop (2nd ed.). CA: Compass Publishing Inc.
Nassaji, H. (2003). Higher-level and lower-level text processing skills in advanced ESL reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 261–276.
Nassaji, H., & Geva, E. (1999). The contribution of phonological and orthographic processing skills to adult ESL reading: Evidence from native speakers of Farsi. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 20, 241–267.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A. (1988). Verbal efficiency theory in reading ability. In M. Daneman, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 109–143). New York: Academic.
Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Cognitive research and the misconceptions of reading education. In J. Oakhill & R. Beard (Eds.), Reading development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective (pp. 42–58). London: Blackwell.
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In D. Gorfien (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Oxford: Blackwell.
Phakiti, A. (2008). Construct validation of Bachman and Palmer’s (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests. Language Testing, 25(2), 237–272.
Stevenson, M. (2005). Reading and writing in a foreign language: A comparison of conceptual and linguistic processes in Dutch and English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitteit van Amsterdam.
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.
van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2004). Linguistic knowledge, processing speed and metacognitive knowledge in first and second language reading comprehension: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 19–30.
Walczyk, J. J. (1993). Are general resource notions still viable in reading research? Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 127–135.
Walczyk, J. J. (1995). A test of the compensatory-encoding model. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 396–408.
Walczyk, J. J. (2000). The interplay between automatic and control process in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 554–556.
Walczyk, J. J., & Raska, J. (1992). The relation between low-and high-level reading skills in children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 38–46.
Walczyk, J. J., & Taylor, R. J. (1996). How do the efficiencies of reading subcomponents relate to looking back in text? Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 737–745.
Walczyk, J. J., Marsiglia, C., Bryan, K., & Naquin, P. (2001). Overcoming inefficient reading skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 750–757.
Walczyk, J. J., Wei, M., Zha, P., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Goubert, S. E., & Cooper, A. (2007). Development of the interplay between automatic processes and cognitive resources in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 867–877.
Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63–102). New York: Academic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Han, F. (2013). The Contribution of Lower-Level Processing to Foreign Language Reading Comprehension with Chinese EFL Learners. In: Zhang, Q., Yang, H. (eds) Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2012 Conference Proceeding. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37592-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37592-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37591-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37592-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)