Abstract
Companies involved in the electric mobility sector such as car manufacturers, battery producers or infrastructure providers are confronted with risks of technological and institutional path dependencies and resulting lock-in situations. One approach that might enable these companies to avoid and cope with such lock-ins is the idea of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities. Accordingly, companies need to be able to replicate their organizational resources through knowledge codification and transfer, and to reconfigure their resources through knowledge abstraction and absorption. This chapter reveals exemplary effects that result from such knowledge-based activities on the abilities to maintain or increase their technological and strategic flexibility. Accordingly, companies in the electric mobility sector have e.g. the chance to reduce risks of path dependent developments through transferring their knowledge internally and between each other in order to trigger a combination of knowledge resources, which in turn increase the varieties of their decision alternatives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackermann R (2001) Pfadabhängigkeit, Institutionen und Regelreform, Tübingen
Ancori B, Bureth A, Cohendet P (2000) The economics of knowledge: the debate about codification and tacit knowledge. Ind Corp Change 9(2):255–287
Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99(394):116–131
Arthur WB (1990) Positive feedbacks in the economy. Sci Am 262(2):92–99
Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17(1):99–120
Barney JB (2002) Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Boisot M (1995) Information space: a framework for learning in organizations, institutions and culture. Thomson Learning Emea, London
Boisot M (1998) Knowledge assets: securing competitive advantage in the information economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bou-Llusar JC, Segarra-Ciprés M (2006) Strategic knowledge transfer and its implications for competitive advantage: an integrative conceptual framework. J Knowl Manage 10(4):100–112
Brauner G (2008) Infrastrukturen der Elektromobilität. e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 125(11):382–386
Burmann C (2002) Strategische Flexibilität und Strategiewechsel als Determinanten des Unternehmenswertes. Deutscher Universit? ts Verlag, Wiesbaden
Casper S, Whitley R (2004) Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK* 1. Res Policy 33(1):89–106
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Quart 35:128–152
Crossan MM, Bedrow I (2003) Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strateg Manag J 24(11):1087–1105
Dammenhain K (2012) Chancen der Elektromobilität [Homepage of Automobil Produktion], [Online]. Available: http://www.automobil-produktion.de/2012/02/chancen-der-elektromobilitaet/. Acessed 06 2012
David PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75:332–337
David PA (1994) Why are institutions the ‘carriers of history’?: path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions. Struct Change Econ Dynam 5:205–220
Dievernich FEP (2007) Pfadabhängigkeit im management: wie Führungsinstrumente zur Entscheidungs- und Innovationsunfähigkeit des managements beitragen, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart
Drucker PF (1993) Post-capitalist society. Harper, New York
Fosfuri A, Tribó JA (2008) Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance. Omega 36(2):173–187
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston
Freiling J (2004) A competence-based theory of the firm. Int Rev Manage Stud 15:27–52
GarcÃa-Muiña FE, Pelechano-Barahona E, Navas-López JE (2009) Knowledge codification and technological innovation success: empirical evidence from Spanish biotech companies. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(1):141
Göllinger T (1997) Das Innovationspotential der E-Mobility. In: Schriftenreihe: Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für ökologische Betriebswirtschaft Institut für ökologische Betriebswirtschaft e.V., Siegen
Grant RM (2002) The knowledge-based view of the firm. In: Choo CW, Bontis N (eds) The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 133–148
Hedlund G (1994) A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strateg Manag J 15:73–90
Jane Zhao Z, Anand J (2009) A multilevel perspective on knowledge transfer: evidence from the Chinese automotive industry. Strateg Manag J 30(9):959–983
Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 3(3):383–397
Kusunoki K, Nonaka I, Nagata A (1998) Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: a conceptual framework and empirical findings. Organ Sci 9(6):699–718
Liebowitz SJ, Margolis SE (1995) Path dependence, lock-in, and history. J Law Econ Organ 11(1):205–226
Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manage Rev 23(2):242–266
Nonaka I, Mader F, Takeuchi H (1997) Die organisation des Wissens : wie japanische Unternehmen eine brachliegende Ressource nutzbar machen, Campus-Verl., Frankfurt/Main [u.a.]
O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2008) Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Stanford University Graduate School Of Business research paper no. 1963, vol 28. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=978493. pp 185–206
Pehnt M, Helms H, Lambrecht U, Dallinger D, Wietschel M, Heinrichs H, Kohrs R, Link J, Trommer S, Pollok T (2011) Elektroautos in einer von erneuerbaren Energien geprägten Energiewirtschaft. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, pp 1–14
Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Blackwell, Oxford
Porter ME (1999) Wettbewerbsstrategie : Methoden zur Analyse von Branchen und Konkurrenten = (Competitive strategy), 10., durchges. und erw. Aufl edn, Campus-Verl., Frankfurt/Main [u.a]
Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus Rev 68(3):79–91
Quinn JB (1992) The intelligent enterprise a new paradigm. The Executive 6(4):48–63
Sammer G, Stark J, Link C (2011) Einflussfaktoren auf die Nachfrage nach Elektroautos. e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 128(1):22–27
Sanchez R (2004) Understanding competence-based management—identifying and managing five modes of competence. J Bus Res 57(5):518–532
Schäcke M (2006) Pfadabhängigkeit in Organisationen—Ursache für Widerstände bei Reorganisationsprojekten, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin
Schreyögg G, Kliesch-Eberl M (2007) How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strateg Manag J 28(9):913
Schreyögg G, Sydow J, Koch J (2003) Organisatorische Pfade—Von der Pfadabhängigkeit zur Pfadkreation. In: Schreyögg G, Sydow J (eds) Strategische Prozesse und Pfade. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 257–294
Selznick P (1957) Leadership in administration: a sociological interpretation. Harper, Row, New York
Spender JC, Grant RM (1996) Knowledge and the firm: overview. Strateg Manag J 17:5–9
Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strateg Manag J 17:27–43
Szulanski G (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82(1):9–27
Teece DJ (1981) The market for know-how and the efficient international transfer of technology. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 458:81–96
Teece DJ, Pisano G (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Ind Corp Change 3(3):537–556
Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533
Van Driel H, Dolfsma W (2009) Path dependence, initial conditions, and routines in organizations: the Toyota production system re-examined. J Organ Change Manage 22(1):49–72
Vera D, Crossan M (2005) Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organ Sci 16(3):203–224
Wallentowitz H, Freialdenhoven A (2011) Treiber für Veränderungen. Strategien zur Elektrifizierung des Antriebsstranges, pp 3–37
Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(5):171–180
Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manage Rev 27(2):185–203
Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13(3):339–351
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development in the context of the ‘Model Regions Electric Mobility’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cordes, P., Hülsmann, M. (2014). How Knowledge-Based Dynamic Capabilities Help to Avoid and Cope with Path Dependencies in the Electric Mobility Sector. In: Hülsmann, M., Fornahl, D. (eds) Evolutionary Paths Towards the Mobility Patterns of the Future. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37558-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37558-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37557-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37558-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)