Abstract
In recent decades, governance approaches have been widely advocated in the context of immigrant communities. The interplay between state, market, and civil society results in several modes of governance in these approaches. This chapter shows that each mode of governance has its positive and negative consequences for the regeneration of immigrant communities. Planning support systems (PSS) can assist in dealing with the negative consequences. This chapter suggests that three types of PSS—namely “informing PSS,” “communicating PSS,” and “analyzing PSS”—can play a distinctive role in dealing with the specific deficiencies of each mode of governance in the context of immigrant communities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cai XX, Hu HD (2012) Design research on social housing for non-registered migrants in the urban fringe area with fast urbanization background (taking the southern suburban urban villages of Beijing as instance). Master thesis, Architecture, Urban Design and Regional Planning Department, K. U. Leuven
Chung H (2009) The planning of “villages in the city” in Shenzhen, china: the significance of the new state-led approach. Int Plann Stud 14(3):253–273
Conde LP, Magalhaes S (2004) Favela-Bairro: rewriting the history of Rio. ViverCidades, Rio de Janeiro
Douglass M, Friedmann J (1998) Cities for citizens. Wiley, New York
Driessen PJP, Dieperink C, Van Laerhoven F, Runhaar HAC, Vermeulen WJV (2012) Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance—experiences from the Netherlands. Environ Policy Governance 22:143–160
Fiori J, Riley L, Ramirez R (2000) Urban poverty alleviation through environmental upgrading in Rio de Janeiro: Favela Bairro. Research report for the UK department for international development (DFID)
Geertman S (2002) Participatory planning and GIS: a PSS to bridge the gap. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 29:21–35
Geertman S (2012) Planning support systems as research instruments. J Urban Des Plan (accepted)
Hao P, Sliuzas R, Geertman S (2011) The development and redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen. Habitat Int 35(2):214–224
Harris B, Batty M (1993) Locational models geographic information and planning support systems. J Plan Educ Res 12:184–198
Healey P (2006) Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Palgrave Macmillan
Huang PCC (1993) Public sphere/civil society in China? The third realm between state and society. Mod China 19(2):216–240
Kahila M, Kyttä M (2009) SoftGIS as a bridge-builder in collaborative urban planning. In: Geertman G, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Springer, New York, pp 389–412
Kesteloot C (2003) Urban social-spatial configurations and the future of European cities. Paper prepared for the Eurex online seminar 2003
Lieske SN, Mullen S, Hamerlinck JD (2009) Enhancing comprehensive planning with public engagement and planning support integration. In: Geertman G, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Springer, New York, pp 295–316
Lin YL, De Meulder B (2012) A conceptual framework for the strategic urban project approach for the sustainable redevelopment of ‘villages in the city’ in Guangzhou. Habitat Int 36:380–387
Lin YL, De Meulder B, Wang SF (2011) Understanding the “village in the city” in Guangzhou: economic integration and development issue and their implications for the urban migrant. Urban Stud 48(16):3575–3590
Loeckx A (2009) Project and design, amending the project mode. In: Loeckx A (ed) Framing urban renewal in Flanders. SUN, Amsterdam
ODPM (2002) Development of a migration model, report prepared by the university of Newcastle upon Tyne, the university of Leeds, and the greater London authority/London research centre. ODPM, London
Pettit C, Wyatt R (2009) A planning support system toolkit approach for formulating and evaluating land use change scenarios. In: Geertman G, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Springer, New York, pp 69–92
Santosa H (2000) Environmental management Surabaya with reference to national agenda 21 and the social safety programme. Environ Urbanization 12(2):175–184
Silas J (1984) The kampung improvement programme of Indonesia: a comparative case study of Jakarta and Surabaya. In: Payne GK (ed) Low-income housing in the developing world. Wiley Ltd
Silas J (1992) The Kampung improvement program, Surabaya. www.Mukinits.com
Silas J (2010) KIP (kampung improvement program) in Surabaya. In: d’Auria V, De Meulder B, Shannon K (eds) Human settlements: formulations and (re)calibrations. SUN Architecture Publishers, San Francisco
Smolka M, Iracheta A (2000) Mobilizing land value increments to provide service land for the poor. Colegio Mexiquense, Mexico city
Souto de Oliveira J (2003) Rethinking informal economy in Rio de Janeiro. http://mospi.nic.in/informal_paper_2003_06.htm
Soutter M, Repetti A (2009) Land management with the SMURF planning support system. In: Geertman G, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Springer, New York, pp 369–388
UN-Habitat (2003) The challenge of slums: global report on human settlements 2003. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London
Van Delden H, Hagen-Zanker A (2009) New ways of supporting decision making: linking qualitative storylines with quantitative modelling. In: Geertman G, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Springer, New York, pp 295–316
Vescina L (2007) Experiences from the South: a critical appropriation of the urban project: some cases in Brazil and Argentina, ISOCARP Review 03
White G, Howell J, Shang X (1996) In search of civil society in China. Clarendon press, Oxford
Zhang L (2005) Migrant enclaves and impact of redevelopment policy in Chinese cities. In: Ma LJC, Wu FL (eds) Restructuring the Chinese city: changing society, economy and space. Routledge, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lin, Y., Geertman, S. (2013). Governance Approaches in the Regeneration of Immigrant Communities: Potential Roles of Planning Support Systems (PSS). In: Geertman, S., Toppen, F., Stillwell, J. (eds) Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, vol 195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37532-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37533-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)