Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What’s in a Diagram?

On the Classification of Symbols, Figures and Diagrams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 8))

Abstract

In this paper I analyze the cognitive function of symbols, figures and diagrams. The analysis shows that although all three representational forms serve to externalize mental content, they do so in radically different ways, and consequently they have qualitatively different functions in mathematical cognition. Symbols represent by convention and allow mental computations to be replaced by epistemic actions. Figures and diagrams both serve as material anchors for conceptual structures. However, figures do so by having a direct likeness to the objects they represent, whereas diagrams have a metaphorical likeness. Thus, I claim that diagrams can be seen as material anchors for conceptual mappings. This classification of diagrams is of theoretical importance as it sheds light on the functional role played by conceptual mappings in the production of new mathematical knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be noted that there is an interesting parallelism between the concept of epistemic actions developed in [21], and the concept of manipulative abduction developed by Lorenzo Magnani (e.g. [25, 26]). Magnani’s concept is however developed in a slightly different theoretical framework, and it would take us too far astray to explore the parallelism further.

References

  1. Allwein, G., Barwise, J. (eds.): Logical Reasoning with Diagrams. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ball, W.W.R.: Mathematical Recreations and Essays, 4th edn. Maxmillan and Co, London (1905)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barwise, J., Etchemendy, J.: Heterogeneous logic. In: Glasgow, J., Narayanan, N.H., Chandrasekaran, B. (eds.) Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, pp. 211–234. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, J.R.: Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction to a World of Proofs and Pictures. Routledge, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, A. Magic words: how language augments human computation. In: Carruthers, P., Boucher, J. (eds.) Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes, PP. 162–183. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, P.J.: Visual theorems. Educ. Stud. Math. 24(4), 333–344 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Cruz, H.: Mathematical symbols as epistemic actions—an extended mind perspective. Unpublished on-line working paper (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Cruz, H.: Innate Ideas as a Naturalistic Source of Mathematical Knowledge. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eilenberg, S., Steenrod, N.: Foundations of Algebraic Topology. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fauconnier, G., Turner, M.: The Way We Think: Conceptual Bending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giaquinto, M.: Visual Thinking in Mathematics:an Epistemological Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Giaquinto, M.: Crossing curves: a limit to the use of diagrams in proofs. Philosophia. Mathematica. 19(3), 281–307 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Glasgow, J., Narayanan, N.H., Chandrasekaran, B.: Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. AAAI Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heath, T.L.: The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements. Barnes & Nobel, Inc., New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hutchins, E.: Material anchors for conceptual blends. J. Pragmatics 37(10), 1555–1577 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobson, N.: Basic Algebra, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jensen, A.F.: Metaforens magt. Fantasiens fostre og fornuftens fødsler. Modtryk, Aarhus C (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johansen, M.W.: Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Science, Copenhagen (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson, M.: The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kirsh, D.: Thinking with external representations. AI & Soc. 25(4), 441–454 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kirsh, D., Maglio, P.: On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cogn. Sci. 18(4), 513–549 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lakoff, G., Núñez, R.: Where Mathematics comes from: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. Basic Books, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Larvor, B.: Syntactic analogies and impossible extensions. In: Löve, B., & Müller, T. (eds.) PhiMSAMP. Philosophy of Mathematics: Sociological Aspects and Mathematical Practice. Texts in Philosophy, vol. 11, pp. 197–208. College Publications, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Magnani, L.: Conjectures and manipulations: external representations in scientific reasoning. Mind Soc. 3(1), 9–31 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Magnani, L.: External diagrammatization and iconic brain co-evolution. Semiotica 186, 213–238 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mancosu, P.: Visualization in logic and mathematics. In: Mancosu, P., Jørgensen, K.F., Pedersen, S.A. (eds.) Visualization, Explanation and Reasoning Styles in Mathematics, pp. 13–30. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Manders, K.: Diagram based geometric practice. In: Mancosu, P. (ed.) The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice, pp. 65–79. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Messer, R.: Linear Algebra: Gateway to Mathematics. HarperCollins College Publishers, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pasch, M., ehn, M.: Vorlesungen über neuere Geometrie. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 23. Springer, Berlin (1882/1926)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reviel, N.: The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: a Study in Cognitive History. Ideas in Context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shin, S.J.: The Logical Status of Diagrams. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shin, S.J., Lemon, O.: Diagrams. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, winter 2008 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/diagrams/ (2008)

  34. Tennant, N.: The withering away of formal semantics? Mind & Lang. 1(4), 302–318 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Københavns Universitet, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Mikkel Willum Johansen

Authors
  1. Mikkel Willum Johansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikkel Willum Johansen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Humanities Philosophy Section, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

    Lorenzo Magnani

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Johansen, M.W. (2014). What’s in a Diagram?. In: Magnani, L. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37428-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation