Skip to main content

Modelling Systems in Technology as Instrumental Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 8))

Abstract

Modelling is an extremely important aspect of the work of engineers. Ever since technology changed from a craft-based to a science-based practice, engineers have been engaged in modelling the artefacts they design, build and test. The modelling techniques they rely on, however, originate from the physical sciences. They work well for the technical devices, modelled as physical systems, that are the traditional products of the engineering disciplines. It is increasingly recognized, however, that modern technology consists in the implementation and operation of systems rather than single devices. The traditional conceptual framework of engineering, derived from the natural sciences, is ill-fit to model the hybridity and mereological complexity that are the key features of systems in technology. In this paper I present an approach to the modelling of systems in technology which is based on an incorporation of these two aspects from the start, represented in the notion of an instrumental system. I first show how the hybridity—the interaction between intentional action and causal processes—is taken care of in the basic structure of any instrumental system. Next I show how the representation of mereological complexity is taken care of through recursion. Finally relevance and potential applications of the approach are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One may assume that what was actually meant was ‘hard-systems thinking’ and ‘soft-systems thinking’, although the hyphen-less reading may be thought to fit the situation as well. But, deplorably, the hyphen is the most brutally ignored ingredient of English orthography in academic writing.

  2. 2.

    Note that their Theory of technical systems is a translation of the 1984 original with the German title Theorie technischer Systeme, which is again the second revised and extended edition of a book from 1974 entitled Theorie der Maschinensystemen (‘Theory of machine systems’).

  3. 3.

    The first presentation of the notion of an instrumental system and of its stratified structure is [6]. I wish to acknowledge the important contributions of Bjørn Jespersen to the theory of instrumental system presented here.

  4. 4.

    To be very precise, the intention in nutcracking is to crack a nutshell, rather than an entire nut. A cracked entire nut typically counts as a failure. Still, the instrumental system’s object is the nut, not just the nutshell. If you could somehow isolate the shell from the nut to crack just the shell, you ipso facto have lost the need for cracking the shell.

  5. 5.

    Malfunctioning systems can either be seen as included in the idle systems or as forming a system state of its own, next to operational systems and idle systems. I see no compelling reason to prefer the one to the other.

  6. 6.

    This cannot work in biology, but there we may acquiesce in finding it impossible to ascribe a function to an entire organism. On the other hand, organisms could be seen as having functions derived from the role they play in ecosystems.

  7. 7.

    Metaphysically, this may not be so straightforward: the ‘is’ in this statement is arguably not the ‘is’ of identity but rather the ‘is’ of realization or constitution.

References

  1. Hughes, T.P.: Networks of power: electrification in Western society, 1880–1930. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson, B.: Systems: concepts, methodologies, and applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bunge, M.: Treatise on basic philosophy, vol. 4: a world of systems. Reidel, Dordrecht (1979)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Hubka, V., Eder, W.E.: Theory of technical systems: a total concept theory for engineering design. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Hughes, T.P.: The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T. (eds) The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology, pp. 51–82. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Franssen, M., Jespersen, B.: From nutcracking to assisted driving: stratified instrumental systems and the modeling of complexity. In: Engineering Systems: Achievements and Challenges. Papers Presented at the Second International Symposium on Engineering Systems, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 15–17 June 2009, http://esd.mit.edu/symp09/submitted-papers/franssen-paper.pdf

  7. Franssen, M., Kroes, P.: Sociotechnical systems. In: Berg Olsen, J.K., Pedersen, S.A., Hendricks, V.F. (eds.) A companion to the philosophy of technology, pp. 223–226. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vermaas, P., Kroes, P., van de Poel, I., Franssen, M., Houkes, W.: A philosophy of technology: from technical artefacts to sociotechnical systems. Morgan & Claypool, San Francisco (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cummins, R.: Functional analysis. J. Philos. 72, 741–765 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Weck, O.L., Roos, D., Magee, C.L.: Engineering systems: meeting human needs in a complex technological world. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kroes, P., Franssen, M., van de Poel, I., Ottens, M.: Treating socio-technical systems as engineering systems: some conceptual problems. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 23, 803–814 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ottens, M., Franssen, M., Kroes, P., van de Poel, I.: Modelling infrastructures as sociotechnical systems. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. 2, 133–145 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarten Franssen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Franssen, M. (2014). Modelling Systems in Technology as Instrumental Systems. In: Magnani, L. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37428-9_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics