Skip to main content

Combining Sources of Description for Approximating Music Similarity Ratings

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7836))

Abstract

In this paper, we compare the effectiveness of basic acoustic features and genre annotations when adapting a music similarity model to user ratings. We use the Metric Learning to Rank algorithm to learn a Mahalanobis metric from comparative similarity ratings in in the MagnaTagATune database. Using common formats for feature data, our approach can easily be transferred to other existing databases. Our results show that genre data allow more effective learning of a metric than simple audio features, but a combination of both feature sets clearly outperforms either individual set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pickens, J.: A survey of feature selection techniques for music information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Novello, A., Mckinney, M.F., Kohlrausch, A.: Perceptual evaluation of music similarity. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pampalk, E.: Computational Models of Music Similarity and their Application in Music Information Retrieval. Ph.D. thesis, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allan, H., Müllensiefen, D., Wiggins, G.: Methodological considerations in studies of musical similarity. In: 8th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, pp. 473–478 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Turnbull, D.R., Barrington, L., Lanckriet, G., Yazdani, M.: Combining audio content and social context for semantic music discovery. In: SIGIR 2009: Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 387–394. ACM, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrington, L., Yazdani, M., Turnbull, D., Lanckriet, G.: Combining feature kernels for semantic music retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), pp. 614–619 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mcfee, B., Lanckriet, G.: Metric learning to rank. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joachims, T., Finley, T., Yu, C.-N.J.: Cutting-plane training of structural svms. Machine Learning 77, 27–59 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Schultz, M., Joachims, T.: Learning a distance metric from relative comparisons. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). MIT Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, J.V., Kulis, B., Jain, P., Sra, S., Dhillon, I.S.: Information-theoretic metric learning. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2007), pp. 209–216. ACM, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Stober, S., Nürnberger, A.: An experimental comparison of similarity adaptation approaches. In: Detyniecki, M., García-Serrano, A., Nürnberger, A., Stober, S. (eds.) AMR 2011. LNCS, vol. 7836, pp. 96–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Law, E., West, K., Mandel, M., Bay, M., Downie, J.S.: Evaluation of algorithms using games: the case of music annotation. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), pp. 387–392 (October 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jehan, T.: Creating Music by Listening. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wolff, D., Tillman, W.: Adapting metrics for music similarity using comparative judgements. In: Proc. International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval (2011) (accepted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tsochantaridis, I., Joachims, T., Hofmann, T., Altun, Y.: Large margin methods for structured and interdependent output variables. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR) 6, 1453–1484 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. McFee, B., Barrington, L., Lanckriet, G.: Learning similarity from collaborative filters. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 345–350 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McFee, B., Lanckriet, G.: Heterogeneous embedding for subjective artist similarity. In: Proc. International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, pp. 513–518 (October 2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wolff, D., Weyde, T. (2013). Combining Sources of Description for Approximating Music Similarity Ratings. In: Detyniecki, M., García-Serrano, A., Nürnberger, A., Stober, S. (eds) Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval. Large-Scale Multimedia Retrieval and Evaluation. AMR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7836. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37425-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37425-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37424-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37425-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics