Advertisement

Flexible Automation in Facility Logistics

  • Andreas Kamagaew
  • Jonas Stenzel
  • Michael ten Hompel
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 480)

Abstract

The concept of “Flexible Automation in Facility Logistics” with a Cellular Transport System shows the possibilities of automation and enhancement of flexibility and changeability in facility logistics systems. Additionally, the ease of use of complex decentralized control systems is shown by the utilization of Multi-Agent-Systems. This chapter shows how to improve these issues compared to conventional facility logistics systems, e.g. static conveyors or manual transportation, by using an autonomous vehicle swarm with a decentralized control architecture. Cellular Transport Systems are based on dedicated transportation entities (cells). Generally, these cells consist of Autonomous Transport Vehicles (ATVs) or autonomous conveying modules. Various functions such as advanced sensor/actuator interoperation, highly reliable communication, localization and energy management are implemented in each of these cells, facilitating different forms of adaptive, anticipatory and collective behavior.

Keywords

Collision Avoidance Swarm Intelligence Automate Guide Vehicle Unit Load System Topology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Günthner, M. ten Hompel (eds.), Internet der Dinge in der Intralogistik (Springer, Berlin, 2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. S. Mayer, Development of a completely decentralized control system for modular continuous conveyors, Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 2009Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Scholz-Reiter, S. Schulz, Selbststeuerung in der Logistik, in Jahrbuch Logistik 2007, ed. by H. Wolf-Kluthausen. Korschenbroich: free Beratung GmbH, 2007, pp. 236–240Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Z. Guessoum, Adaptive Agents and Multiagent Systems, IEEE Distrib. Syst. Online. 5, 7 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Dorigo, E. Bonabeau, G. Theraulaz, Swarm Intelligence—From-Natural to Artificial Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. ten Hompel, A. Kamagaew, “Zellulare Intralogistik—in Zukunft nur noch Multishuttles?” in 20 (Deutscher Materialflusskongress, München, 2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Thrun, W. Burgard, D. Fox, Probabilistic Robotics (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Kamagaew, E. Große, Zellulare Transportsysteme—Multishuttle Move, Multimodales Intralogistikkonzept. Hebezeuge Fördermittel 51(4), 170–172 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Kamagaew, J. Stenzel, M. ten Hompel, Concept of Cellular Transport Systems in Facility Logistics in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA), 2011, Wellington, New Zealand, Dec. 2011, pp. 40–45Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Kirsch, C. Röhrig, Position Tracking Using Sensor Fusion of a Wireless Network and a Laser Range Finder, in Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Workshop on Positioning Navigation and Communication (WPNC 2010), Dresden, Germany, March 2010Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Röhrig, M. Müller, Indoor Location Tracking in Non-line-of-Sight Environments Using a IEEE 802.15.4a Wireless Network, in Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2009), St. Lous, USA, Oct 2009, pp. 552–557Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Kamagaew
    • 1
  • Jonas Stenzel
    • 1
  • Michael ten Hompel
    • 2
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and LogisticsDortmundGermany
  2. 2.Chair for Materials Handling and WarehousingTU Dortmund—University of TechnologyDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations