Skip to main content

Production Process Improvement Using the Six Sigma DMAIC Methodology: A Case Study of a Laser Computer Mouse Production Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

Abstract

This paper aims to improve a production process of a laser computer mouse by using the Six Sigma DMAIC Methodology. This study focuses on the functional test procedure because of its lowest yield. The regression analysis and two-level factorial design of experiments is employed in order to determine the optimal conditions of parameters. By operating under these resulting conditions, yield of the functional test procedure increases from 96.2 to 98.6%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antony J, Bhuller AS, Kumar M, Mendibil K, Montgomery DC (2012) Application of Six Sigma DMAIC methodology in a transactional environment. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 29(1):31–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhote K (2003) The power of ultimate Six Sigma. Amacom, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington RB (1990) Regression and linear models. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung YY, Chen YS, Ng SP, Liu L, Huang YH, Luk BL, Ip RWL, Wu CML, Chung PS (2009) Review and comparison of shearography and active thermography for nondestructive evaluation. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 64(5–6):73–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger R, Riedl MC (2011) MBE growth of VCSELs for high volume applications. J Cryst Growth 323(1):434–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Strandlund E, Thomas D (2008) Improved service system design using Six Sigma DMAIC for a major US consumer electronics and appliance retailer. Int J Retail Distrib Manage 36(12):970–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaphart CL, Gonwa TA, Mai ML, Prendergast MB, Wadei HM, Tepas JJ III, Taner CB (2012) Formal quality improvement curriculum and DMAIC method results in interdisciplinary collaboration and process improvement in renal transplant patients. J Surg Res 177(1):7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickrell G, Lyons HJ, Shaver J (2005) Lean Six Sigma implementation case studies. IntJ Six Sigma Compet Adv 1(4):369–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyzdek T, Keller PA (2009) The Six Sigma handbook, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanmugaraja M, Nataraj M, Gunasekaran N (2011) Defect control analysis for improving quality and productivity: an innovative Six Sigma case study. Int J Qual Innov 1(3):259–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tague NR (2004) Seven basic quality tools. American Society for Quality, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Pimsakul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pimsakul, S., Somsuk, N., Junboon, W., Laosirihongthong, T. (2013). Production Process Improvement Using the Six Sigma DMAIC Methodology: A Case Study of a Laser Computer Mouse Production Process. In: Qi, E., Shen, J., Dou, R. (eds) The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37270-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics