Skip to main content

Explanation in Computational Stylometry

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7817))

Abstract

Computational stylometry, as in authorship attribution or profiling, has a large potential for applications in diverse areas: literary science, forensics, language psychology, sociolinguistics, even medical diagnosis. Yet, many of the basic research questions of this field are not studied systematically or even at all. In this paper we will go into these problems, and suggest that a reinterpretation of current and historical methods in the framework and methodology of machine learning of natural language processing would be helpful. We also argue for more attention in research for explanation in computational stylometry as opposed to purely quantitative evaluation measures and propose a strategy for data collection and analysis for achieving progress in computational stylometry. We also introduce a fairly new application of computational stylometry in internet security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van Halteren, H., Baayen, H., Tweedie, F., Haverkort, M., Neijt, A.: New machine learning methods demonstrate the existence of a human stylome. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 12(1), 65–77 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stamatatos, E.: A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. JASIST 60(3), 538–556 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koppel, M., Schler, J., Argamon, S.: Computational methods in authorship attribution. JASIST 60(1), 9–26 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Juola, P.: Author attribution. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 1(3), 233–334 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pennebaker, J.: The Secret Life of Pronouns. Bloomsbury Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fan, J., Kalyanpur, A., Gondek, D., Ferrucci, D.: Automatic knowledge extraction from documents. IBM Journal of Research and Development 56(3/4), 1–10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, B.: Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, 180 pages. Morgan & Claypool Publishers(2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sebastiani, F.: Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization. ACM Computing Surveys 34(1), 1–47 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koppel, M., Schler, J., Argamon, S.: Authorship attribution in the wild. Language Resources and Evaluation 45, 83–94 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Daelemans, W., Van den Bosch, A.: Memory-based language processing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Argamon, S.: Interpreting Burrow’s Delta: Geometric and Probabilistic Foundations. Literary and Linguistic Computing 23(3), 131–147 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koppel, M., Schler, J., Bonchel-Dokov, E.: Measuring differentiability: unmasking pseudonymous authors. Journal of Machine Learning Research 8, 1261–1276 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Rudman, J.: The state of authorship attribution studies: some problems and solutions. Computers and the Humanities 31(4), 351–365 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rudman, J.: The satet of non-traditional authorship studies 2010: some problems and solutions. In: Proceedings of the Digital Humanities, pp. 217–219 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stamou, C.: Stylochronometry: stylistic development, sequence of composition, and relative dating. Literary and Linguistic Computing 23(2), 181–199 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Brennan, M., Afroz, S., Greenstadt, R.: Adversarial Stylometry: circumventing authorship recognition to preserve privacy and anonymity. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 15(3), 12:1–22 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luyckx, K., Daelemans, W.: The effect of author set size and data size in authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26(1), 35–55 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grieve, J.: Quantitative authorship attribution: an evaluation of techniques. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22(3), 251–270 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koppel, M., Schler, J.: Authorship verification as a one-class classification problem. In: Proceedings 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 489–495 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Koppel, M., Schler, J., Argamon, S., Winter, Y.: The Fundamental Problem of Authorship Attribution. English Studies 93(3), 284–291 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Luyckx, K.: Scalability Issues in Authorship Attribution. UPA, Antwerp (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Daumé III, H.: Marcu. D.: Domain Adaptation for Statistical Classifiers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 26, 101–126 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kestemont, M., Luyckx, K., Daelemans, W., Crombez, T.: Cross-genre authorship verification using unmasking. English Studies 93(3), 340–356 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stein, B., Lipka, N., Prettenhofer, P.: Intrinsic plagiarism analysis. Language Resources and Evaluation 45(1), 63–82 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanderson, C., Guenter, S.: Short text authorship attribution via sequence kernels, markov chains and author unmasking: an investigation. In: Proceedings of the 2006 EMNLP, pp. 482–491 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Koppel, M., Argamon, S., Shimoni, S.: Automatically categorizing written texts by author gender. Literary and Linguistic Computing 17(4), 401–412 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peersman, C., Daelemans, W., Van Vaerenbergh, L.: Predicting Age and Gender in Online Social Networks. In: 3rd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-generated Contents (SMUC 2011), pp. 37–44 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peersman, C., Vaassen, F., Van Asch, V., Daelemans, W.: Conversation Level Constraints on Pedophile Detection in Chat Rooms. In: CLEF 2012 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum, pp. 1–13 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Luyckx, K., Vaassen, F., Peersman, C., Daelemans, W.: Fine-Grained Emotion Detection in Suicide Notes: A Thresholding Approach to Multi-Label Classification. Biomedical Informatics Insights 5(suppl. 1), 61–69 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Daelemans, W. (2013). Explanation in Computational Stylometry. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7817. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37256-8_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37256-8_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37255-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37256-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics