Abstract
Computational stylometry, as in authorship attribution or profiling, has a large potential for applications in diverse areas: literary science, forensics, language psychology, sociolinguistics, even medical diagnosis. Yet, many of the basic research questions of this field are not studied systematically or even at all. In this paper we will go into these problems, and suggest that a reinterpretation of current and historical methods in the framework and methodology of machine learning of natural language processing would be helpful. We also argue for more attention in research for explanation in computational stylometry as opposed to purely quantitative evaluation measures and propose a strategy for data collection and analysis for achieving progress in computational stylometry. We also introduce a fairly new application of computational stylometry in internet security.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
van Halteren, H., Baayen, H., Tweedie, F., Haverkort, M., Neijt, A.: New machine learning methods demonstrate the existence of a human stylome. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 12(1), 65–77 (2005)
Stamatatos, E.: A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. JASIST 60(3), 538–556 (2009)
Koppel, M., Schler, J., Argamon, S.: Computational methods in authorship attribution. JASIST 60(1), 9–26 (2008)
Juola, P.: Author attribution. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 1(3), 233–334 (2008)
Pennebaker, J.: The Secret Life of Pronouns. Bloomsbury Press, New York (2011)
Fan, J., Kalyanpur, A., Gondek, D., Ferrucci, D.: Automatic knowledge extraction from documents. IBM Journal of Research and Development 56(3/4), 1–10 (2012)
Liu, B.: Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, 180 pages. Morgan & Claypool Publishers(2012)
Sebastiani, F.: Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization. ACM Computing Surveys 34(1), 1–47 (2002)
Koppel, M., Schler, J., Argamon, S.: Authorship attribution in the wild. Language Resources and Evaluation 45, 83–94 (2011)
Daelemans, W., Van den Bosch, A.: Memory-based language processing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Argamon, S.: Interpreting Burrow’s Delta: Geometric and Probabilistic Foundations. Literary and Linguistic Computing 23(3), 131–147 (2008)
Koppel, M., Schler, J., Bonchel-Dokov, E.: Measuring differentiability: unmasking pseudonymous authors. Journal of Machine Learning Research 8, 1261–1276 (2007)
Rudman, J.: The state of authorship attribution studies: some problems and solutions. Computers and the Humanities 31(4), 351–365 (1997)
Rudman, J.: The satet of non-traditional authorship studies 2010: some problems and solutions. In: Proceedings of the Digital Humanities, pp. 217–219 (2010)
Stamou, C.: Stylochronometry: stylistic development, sequence of composition, and relative dating. Literary and Linguistic Computing 23(2), 181–199 (2008)
Brennan, M., Afroz, S., Greenstadt, R.: Adversarial Stylometry: circumventing authorship recognition to preserve privacy and anonymity. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 15(3), 12:1–22 (2012)
Luyckx, K., Daelemans, W.: The effect of author set size and data size in authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26(1), 35–55 (2011)
Grieve, J.: Quantitative authorship attribution: an evaluation of techniques. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22(3), 251–270 (2007)
Koppel, M., Schler, J.: Authorship verification as a one-class classification problem. In: Proceedings 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 489–495 (2004)
Koppel, M., Schler, J., Argamon, S., Winter, Y.: The Fundamental Problem of Authorship Attribution. English Studies 93(3), 284–291 (2012)
Luyckx, K.: Scalability Issues in Authorship Attribution. UPA, Antwerp (2010)
Daumé III, H.: Marcu. D.: Domain Adaptation for Statistical Classifiers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 26, 101–126 (2006)
Kestemont, M., Luyckx, K., Daelemans, W., Crombez, T.: Cross-genre authorship verification using unmasking. English Studies 93(3), 340–356 (2012)
Stein, B., Lipka, N., Prettenhofer, P.: Intrinsic plagiarism analysis. Language Resources and Evaluation 45(1), 63–82 (2011)
Sanderson, C., Guenter, S.: Short text authorship attribution via sequence kernels, markov chains and author unmasking: an investigation. In: Proceedings of the 2006 EMNLP, pp. 482–491 (2006)
Koppel, M., Argamon, S., Shimoni, S.: Automatically categorizing written texts by author gender. Literary and Linguistic Computing 17(4), 401–412 (2003)
Peersman, C., Daelemans, W., Van Vaerenbergh, L.: Predicting Age and Gender in Online Social Networks. In: 3rd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-generated Contents (SMUC 2011), pp. 37–44 (2012)
Peersman, C., Vaassen, F., Van Asch, V., Daelemans, W.: Conversation Level Constraints on Pedophile Detection in Chat Rooms. In: CLEF 2012 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum, pp. 1–13 (2012)
Luyckx, K., Vaassen, F., Peersman, C., Daelemans, W.: Fine-Grained Emotion Detection in Suicide Notes: A Thresholding Approach to Multi-Label Classification. Biomedical Informatics Insights 5(suppl. 1), 61–69 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Daelemans, W. (2013). Explanation in Computational Stylometry. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7817. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37256-8_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37256-8_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37255-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37256-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)