Abstract
Respiratory function of the nose is to sufficiently condition the respirated air which is maintained by supplying the mucosa with thermal energy and fluid for humidification. This is supplied by the blood circulation and in coherence with the nasal cycle (Grützenmacher et al. Am J Rhinol 1:53–57, 2005). The erectile tissue enables the turbinates to cyclically congest and decongest. One side of the nose is in its working phase conditioning the air, with an unimpeded air passage and increased turbulence. At the same time, the contralateral side is in its resting phase, saving energy and moisture by high airway resistant low turbulence (Lang et al. Laryngoscope 113(2):284–289, 2003).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Battle E. Einflüsse der Temperatur auf den Nasenwiderstand. Dissertation, Zürich; 1989.
Baumann A, Masing H. Über den Einfluß körperlicher Arbeit auf den Nasenwiderstand. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1970;49:264–70.
Block RA, Arnott DP, Quigley B. Unilateral nostril breathing influences lateralized cognitive performance. Brain Cogn. 1989;9:181–90.
Cole P. Upper respiratory airflow. In: Proctor DF, Andersen IB, editors. The nose. Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier; 1982.
Cole P, Haight JS. Posture and nasal patency. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;129:351–4.
Cole P, Haight JS. Posture and the nasal cycle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1986;95(3 Pt 1):233–7.
Cole P, Niinimaa V, Mintz S, Silverman F. Work of nasal breathing: measurement of each nostril independently using a split mask. Acta Otolaryngol. 1979;88:148–54.
Cole P, Forsyth R, Haight JS. Effects of cold air and exercise on nasal patency. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1983a;92:196–8.
Cole P, Haight JS, Cooper PW, Kassel EE. A computed tomographic study of nasal mucosa: effects of vasoactive substances. J Otolaryngol. 1983b;12:58–60.
Cole P, Haight JS, Naito K, Kucharczyk W. Magnetic resonance imaging of the nasal airways. Am J Rhinol. 1989;3:63–7.
Dallimore NS, Eccles R. Changes in human nasal resistance associated with exercise, hyperventilation and rebreathing. Acta Otolaryngol. 1977;84:416–21.
Doyle WJ, van Cauwenberge PB. Relationship between nasal patency and clearance. Rhinology. 1987;25(3):167–79.
Drettner B. Vascular reaction of the human nasal mucosa on exposure to cold. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1961;161:1–109.
Drettner B. Die Ventilation der Nase und der Nebenhöhlen. Z Laryngol Rhinol. 1967;46:159–72.
Eccles R. The central rhythm of the nasal cycle. Acta Otolaryngol. 1978;86:464–8.
Eccles R. Neurological and pharmacological considerations. In: Proctor DF, Andersen IB, editors. The nose. Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier; 1982.
Eccles R. Nasal airflow in health and disease. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120:580–95.
Eccles R, Reilly M, Eccles KS. Changes in the amplitude of the nasal cycle associated with symptoms of acute respiratory tract infection. Acta Otolaryngol. 1996;116:77–81.
Fisher EW, Liu M, Lund VJ. The nasal cycle after deprivation of airflow: a study of laryngectomy patients using acoustic rhinometry. Acta Otolaryngol. 1994;114(4):443–6.
Gallego AJ, Cavallari FE, Valera FC, Demarco RC, Anselmo-Lima WT. Study of nasal cycles in children by acoustic rhinometry. Am J Rhinol. 2006;20:560–2.
Gilbert AN, Rosenwasser AM. Biological rhythmicity of nasal airway patency: a re-examination of the ‘nasal cycle’. Acta Otolaryngol. 1987;104(1–2):180–6.
Gotlib T, Samoliński B, Grzanka A. Bilateral nasal allergen provocation monitored with acoustic rhinometry. Assessment of both nasal passages and the side reacting with greater congestion: relation to the nasal cycle. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35(3):313–8.
Grützenmacher S, Lang C, Mlynski R, Mlynski B, Mlynski G. Long-term rhinoflowmetry: a new method for functional rhinologic diagnostics. Am J Rhinol. 2005;19(1):53–7.
Gungor A, Moinuddin R, Nelson RH, Corey JP. Detection of the nasal cycle with acoustic rhinometry: techniques and applications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;120(2):238–47.
Haight JS, Cole P. Reciprocating nasal airflow resistances. Acta Otolaryngol. 1984;97:93–8.
Haight JS, Cole P. Unilateral nasal resistance and asymmetrical body pressure. J Otolaryngol Suppl. 1986;16:1–31.
Hanif J, Jawad SS, Eccles R. The nasal cycle in health and disease. Clin Otolaryngol. 2000;25:461–7.
Hasegawa M, Kern EB. The human nasal cycle. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977;52:28–34.
Hasegawa M, Kern EB. The effect of breath holding, hyperventilation, and exercise on nasal resistance. Rhinology. 1978;16:243–9.
Hasegawa M, Saito Y. Postural variations in nasal resistance and symptomatology in allergic rhinitis. Acta Otolaryngol. 1979;88:268–72.
Heetderks DR. Observations on the reaction of normal nasal mucous membrane. Am J Med Sci. 1927;664:231–44.
Ingels KJ, Meeuwsen F, van Strien HL, Graamans K, Huizing EH. Ciliary beat frequency and the nasal cycle. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;248(2):123–6.
Jackson RT. Pharmacologic responsiveness of the nasal mucosa. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1970;79:461–7.
Kayser R. Die exacte Messung der Luftdurchgängigkeit der Nase. Arch Laryngol. 1895;3:101–210.
Keerl R, Weber R, Huppmann A. Darstellung zeitabhängiger Veränderungen der Nasenschleimhaut unter Einsatz modernster Morphsoftware. Laryngorhinootologie. 1995;74:413–8.
Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ, Rosenbaum AE, Kumar AJ, Johns ME. Physiologic mucosal changes within the nose and ethmoid sinus: imaging of the nasal cycle by MRI. Laryngoscope. 1988;98:928–33.
Kern EB. The noncycle nose. Rhinology. 1981;19:59–74.
Keuning J. On the nasal cycle. Int Rhinol. 1968;6:99–136.
Koch U, Pau HW. Beziehung zwischen Nasenwegswiderstand und Tubenfunktion in Abhängigkeit von der Tageszeit. Arch OtoRhino-Laryngol. 1982;235:583–6.
Lang C, Grützenmacher S, Mlynski B, Plontke S, Mlynski G. Investigating the nasal cycle using endoscopy, rhinoresistometry, and acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(2):284–9.
Lenz H, Theelen W, Eichler J. Untersuchungen zum Nasenzyklus mit Hilfe rhinomanometrischer Messungen. HNO. 1995;33:58–61.
Maran AG, Lund VJ. Clinical rhinology. Stuttgart/New York: Thieme; 1990.
Masing H, Wolf G. Der Nachweis des Nasenmuschelzyklus mit Hilfe des Röntgenschichtbildverfahrens. Z Laryng Rhinol. 1969;48:684–92.
Melon J. Contribution a l’etude de l’activite secretoire de la muqueuse nasale. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1968;22:1–244.
Mlynski G, Grützenmacher S, Mlynski B, Lang C. Aerodynamik der Nase – Physiologie und Pathophysiologie. In: Ganz H, Iro H, Hrsg. HNO Praxis heute, vol. 20. Heidelberg: Springer; 2000. p. 61–81.
Pirilä T, Talvisara A, Alho OP, Oja H. Physiological fluctuations in nasal resistance may interfere with nasal monitoring in the nasal provocation test. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997;117(4):596–60.
Rao S, Potdar A. Nasal airflow with body in various positions. J Appl Physiol. 1970;28:162–5.
Richerson HB, Seebohm PM. Nasal airway response to exercise. J Allergy. 1968;41(5):269–84.
Rundcrantz H. Postural variations of nasal patency. Acta Otolaryngol. 1969;68:435–43.
Salman SD, Proctor DF, Swift DL, Evering SA. Nasal resistance: a description of a method and effect of temperature and humidity changes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1971;80:736–43.
Schlegel C, Gammert C. Verhalten des Nasenatemwiderstandes in Kälte und Wärme. Otorhinolaryngol Nova. 1991;1:189–93.
Shannahoff-Khalsa DS, Boyle MR, Buebel ME. The effects of unilateral forced nostril breathing on cognition. Int J Neurosci. 1991;57:239–49.
Sipila JI, Suonpaa JT, Salmivalli AJ, Laippala P. The effect of the nasal cycle on the interpretation of rhinomanometric results in a nasal provocation test. Am J Rhinol. 1990;4:179–84.
Soane RJ, Carney AS, Jones NS, Frier M, Perkins AC, Davis SS, Illum L. The effect of the nasal cycle on mucociliary clearance. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2001;26(1):9–15.
Stoksted P. The physiologic cycle of the nose under normal and pathologic conditions. Acta Otolaryngol. 1952;42:175–9.
Stoksted P. Rhinomanometric measurements for determination of the nasal cycle. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1953;109(Suppl):159–75.
Stoksted P, Nielsen JZ. Rhinomanometric measurements of the nasal passage. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1957;66:187–97.
Takagi Y, Proctor DF, Salman S, Evering S. Effects of cold air and carbon dioxide on nasal air flow resistance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1969;74:40–9.
van Cauwenberge PB. Variations in nasal resistance in young children. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1980;34(2):145–56.
van Cauwenberge PB, Deleye L. Nasal cycle in children. Arch Otolaryngol. 1984;110(2):108–10.
van Cauwenberge PB, de Schynkel K, Kluyskens PM. Clinical use of rhinomanometry in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1984;8(2):163–75.
Webber RL, Jeffcoat MK. MR demonstration of the nasal cycle in the beagle dog. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1987;11:869–71.
Weber R, Keerl R. Einsatz moderner Bild-Datenverarbeitung in der klinisch-rhinologischen Forschung. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1996;I(Suppl):271–96.
Werntz DA, Bickford RG, Bloom FE. Alternating cerebral hemispheric activity and teh lateralization of autonomic nervous function. Hum Neurobiol. 1983;2:39–43.
Zinreich SJ, Kennedy DW, Kumar AJ, Rosenbaum AE, Arrington JA, Johns ME. MR imaging of normal nasal cycle: comparison with sinus pathology. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1988;12(6):1014–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weber, R.K., Werner, J.A. (2013). Function of the Turbinates: Nasal Cycle. In: Önerci, T. (eds) Nasal Physiology and Pathophysiology of Nasal Disorders. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37250-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37250-6_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37249-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37250-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)