Can Design Science Research Bridge Computer Human Interaction and Information Systems?
The initial view of the Information System (IS) community was to consider IS as an “applied” discipline borrowing theories and methods from more mature “reference disciplines”. As ISs shifted from a techno-centric focus to a more balanced view of technology, organizational, management, and social focus, traditional reference disciplines proved to be poor models for emergent goals of IS studies, and the IS field began to pose itself as independent of them. A further shift was advocated in 2002 by Baskerville and Myers who suggested that IS was mature enough to start to create a bidirectional flow of knowledge with other fields. Though this view has been recently challenged by some empirical studies, in this Chapter we contribute to this intellectual discourse through a conceptual analysis of links between the IS and the HCI body of knowledge. In particular we discuss about a possible role of Design Science Research as a cultural and methodological bridge between the two disciplines.
KeywordsInformation systems Computer human interaction Design theory
- 1.Keen, P. G. W. (1980). MIS Research: reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition (pp. 9–18), in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Systems, E. McLean (Ed.), Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- 3.Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642.Google Scholar
- 6.Lee, A. S. (2001). Editorial. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), iii–vii.Google Scholar
- 7.Loebbecke, C., & Leidner, D. (2012). The contribution of top IS publications to subsequent research: A citation analysis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 30, 423–438.Google Scholar
- 8.Wade, M., Biehl, M., & Kim, H. (2006). Information systems is not a reference discipline (and what we can do about it). Journal of AIS, 7, 247–269.Google Scholar
- 9.Grover, V., Ayyagari, R., Gokhale, R., & Lim, J. (2006). A citation analysis of the evolution and state of information systems within a constellation of reference disciplines. Journal of AIS, 7, 270–325.Google Scholar
- 10.Avison, D., & Fitzgerald, G. (1995). Information systems development: Methodologies, techniques and tools (2nd ed.). London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- 11.Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analysing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.Google Scholar
- 12.ACM SIGCHI (1996). Special interest group on human-computer interaction curriculum development group, Technical Report, http://old.sigchi.org/cdg/.
- 13.Spagnoletti, P., Baskerville, R., De Marco, M. (2012). The contributions of Alessandro D’Atri to organization and information systems studies. In: Baskerville et al. (Eds.), Designing organizational systems: an interdisciplinary discourse. LNISO, vol. 1, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- 14.Spagnoletti, P., Tarantino, L. (2012). User centered systems design: The bridging role of justificatory knowledge. In: Baskerville et al. (Eds.), Designing Organizational Systems: An Interdisciplinary Discourse. LNISO vol.1, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- 17.Zhang, P., Carey, J., Te’eni, D., & Tremaine, M. (2005). Integrating human-computer interaction development into the systems development life cycle: A methodology. Communications of the AIS, 15, 512–543.Google Scholar
- 19.Zhang, P., Benbasat, I., Carey, J., Davis, F., Galletta, D., & Strong, D. (2002). Human-computer interaction research in the MIS discipline. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 9(20), 334–355.Google Scholar
- 20.Grudin, J. (2005). Three faces of human-computer interaction. Ieee Annals of the History of Computing, 27, 46–62. IEEE educational activities department. doi: 10.1109/MAHC.2005.67.
- 22.Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.Google Scholar
- 23.Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- 24.Harrison, S., Sengers, P. Tatar, D. (2007). The three paradigms of HCI, Proceedings of CHI 2007, April 28–May 3, 2007, San Jose, USA.Google Scholar
- 26.Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 28.Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 312–335.Google Scholar
- 29.Hevner, A. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 87–92.Google Scholar
- 30.Goldkuhl, G. (2004). Design theories in information systems—a need for multi-grounding. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 6(2), 7.Google Scholar