Does Technology-Mediated Learning Matter for Effective Teams?

  • Leonardo CaporarelloEmail author
  • Giacomo Sarchioni
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 2)


Many research and studies have discussed the importance of understanding and measuring the effectiveness of technology-mediated learning initiatives. Most of the research analyses the effectiveness of such initiatives at the individual level [1, 2]. This research aims to provide insights on the effectiveness of technology-mediated learning (TML) when working in teams. In particular, we intend to investigate whether the usage of “new technologies” might have a beneficial impact on the activities of university students when organized as a team. The “new technologies” considered in the study belong to the following list: blog, e-learning platform, online encyclopaedia, e-mail, online word processing/spreadsheet/presentation software (e.g. Google Docs), smartphone, tablet, gaming console, Internet-connected TV, chat and/or VoIP, Wiki, social network and web hosting/syncing services (e.g. Dropbox). The first results of this research confirm our expectations. Technology allows teams of students to significantly improve their performances on all the dimensions considered.


Technology-mediated learning Team learning Enhancing learning processes 


  1. 1.
    Slatin, J. M. (1990) Reading hypertext: Order and coherence in a new medium. College English, 52(8), 870–883.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leidner, D., & Jarvenpaa, S. (1993). The information age confronts educations: Case studies on electronic classroom. Information Systems Research, 4(1), 24–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mellon, C. A. (1999). Technology and the great pendolum of education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 28–35.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clark, R. E. (1993). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joy, E. H., & Garcia, E. F. (2000). Mesauring Learning Effectiveness: A New Look at No-significant-difference Findings. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(1), 33–39Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sivin-Kichala, J., & Bialo, E. R. (1994). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools, 1990–1994. New York: Interactive Educational System Design, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bryant, K., Campbell, J., & Kerr, D. (2003). Impact of web-based flexible learning on academic performance in information systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 14(1), 41–50.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vroeginday, B. J. (2005). Traditional vs. Online Education: A Comparative Analysis of Learner Outcomes. ProQuest Digital Dissertations.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alavi, M., & Gallupe, R. B. (2003). Using information technology in learning: Case studies in business and management education programs. Academy of Management Learning Education, 2(2), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cumming (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 171–214). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aziz, T., Khan, M. B., & Singh, R. (2010). Effects of information technology usage on student learning: An empirical study in the United States. International Journal of Management, 27(2), 205–217.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Easley, R. F., Devaraj, S., & Crant, M. J. (2003). Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: an empirical analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 247–268.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SDA BocconiSchool of Management, Learning LabMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations