Public Policy Innovation in Distance and On-Line Learning: Reflections on the Italian Case

  • Enrico Maria MosconiEmail author
  • Cecilia Silvestri
  • Stefano Poponi
  • Alessio Maria Braccini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 2)


The dynamic evolution of competences required by professions has to match ever-evolving contexts, in which the growth of the demand of new professionals, poses the threat of a skill shortage. The role of learning and training is strategic to this regard, also thanks to the use of on-line and distance learning that use Internet based technologies to allow learning to be administered in context different than the traditional face-to-face. Literature highlights that e-learning has to be implemented following specific strategies. Within this perspective, this chapter presents and discusses the recent experiences of the public policies for e-learning in Italy.


  1. 1.
    Khan, B. H. (1997). Web-based Instruction: What is it and why is it? In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based Instruction. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, Y. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information and Management, 41, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khan, Badrul H. (2001) A framework for web-based learning. Web-based training, 75–98. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nichols, M. (2003). A theory of e-learning. Educational Technology and Society, 6, 1–10.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Urdan, T., & Weggen, C. (2000) .Corporate e-learning: exploring a new frontier. WRHAMBRECHT +CO.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen, E. B., & Nycz, M. (2006). Learning objects and e-learning: an informing science perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 2, 23–34.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Za, S., & Braccini, A.M. (2012). Designing 3D virtual world platforms for e-learning services. New Frontiers of Organizational Training. In Snene, M. (Ed.) IESS 2012, LNBIP 103, pp. 284–296. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dalsgaard, C. (2006). Social software: e-learning beyond learning management systems. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kemp, J., & Livingstone, D. (2006). Putting a Second Life “Metaverse” Skinon Learning Management Systems. Proceedings of the Second Life Education Workshop at the Second Life Community Convention, pp. 13–18, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dabbagh, N. (2005). Pedagogical models for e-learning: a theory-based design framework. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning., 1, 25–44.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hannafin, M. (1992). Emerging technologies, ISD, and learning environments: critical perspectives. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knoweldge, J. (2000). Distributed learning evolves to meet needs of lifelong learners. Education Edition, 1, 1–15.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 209–229.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ke, F., & Hoadley, C. (2009). Evaluating online learning communities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrico Maria Mosconi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cecilia Silvestri
    • 1
  • Stefano Poponi
    • 1
  • Alessio Maria Braccini
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Economia e ImpresaUniversità degli Studi della TusciaViterboItaly

Personalised recommendations