Skip to main content

The Catchers in the Rye: Students Model Enterprise Architectures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organizational Change and Information Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 2))

  • 2332 Accesses

Abstract

We illustrate how graduate students (“the catchers”) are able to model the enterprise architecture of a real organization (“the rye”) by a grid of analysis techniques. These techniques design a model driven architecture, and are easy to learn by students and to understand by enterprise users. The grid includes three levels. The Aggregate Strategic Level (ASL) uses list and matrix models in the domains of information and business processes. ASL schemas are then mapped on a much more detailed Rich Semantic Level (RSL), that is still independent from the underlying technology. Finally, RSL schemas are mapped on executable models, that reflect technology. The illustration is backed by a case study on small-medium enterprise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The enterprise architecture reflects the orientation of our curriculum “Services Engineering” that allocates 24 of 48 credits on Enterprise Systems architecture and Business Process/Business Service Analysis (for a discussion on Services Science Curricula see [16]).

References

  1. Salinger, J.D. (1951). The catcher in the Rye, Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Open Group. 2009. TOGAF Version 9, The Open Group Architecture Framework, ISBN 978-90-8753-230-7. Document Number G091. Published by The Open Group.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Motta, G., & Pignatelli, G. (2010). From strategic to conceptual information modelling: a method and a case study. Naples: ITaiS.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Motta, G., Barroero, T., Sacco, D. (2012). General Enterprise Framework (GEF): an agile framework to define the business architecture of enterprises, SOLI, Suzhou, China.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, P. (1976). The entity-relationship model-toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Golfarelli, M., Maio, D., & Rizzi, S. (1998). The dimensional fact model: a conceptual model for data warehouses. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 7(2–3), 215–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Briol, P. (2008). BPMN, the Business Process Modeling Notation Pocket Handbook, LuLu, ISBN 978-1-4092-0299-8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Debevoise, N.T., Geneva R. (2008). The micro guide to process modeling in BPMN, BookSurge Publishing, ISBN 978-1-4196-9310-6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ryan, K.L., Lee, S.S.G., Lee, E.W. (1995). Business Process Management (BPM) standards: a survey. Business Process Management Journal. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 15(5).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Penker, M., Eriksson, H.E. (2000). Business modeling with UML: business patterns at work. New York: Wiley, ISBN 0471295515 .

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bolchini, D., Paolini, P. (2004). Goal-driven requirements analysis for hypermedia-intensive web applications. Requirements Engineering. (9:2), 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Codd, E. F. (1970). A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM, 13(6), 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fowler, M. (2003). UML distilled: a brief guide to the standard object modeling language (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-321-19368-7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Juric, M.B., Krizevnik, M. (2010). WS-BPEL 2.0 for SOA composite applications with Oracle SOA Suite 11 g. Birmigham: Pack Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ceri, S., Fraternali, P., & Paraboschi, S. (1998). Design principles for data-intensive web sites. ACM Sigmod Record, 27(4), 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Choudaha, R. (2008). Competency-based curriculum for a master’s program in Service Science, Management and Engineering (SSME): an online Delphi study, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Motta, G., Pignatelli, G. (2010). Information strategy: an analysis framework. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 7(2), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  18. TM Forum, Enhanced Telecom Operations Map (eTOM). (2005). The business process framework: for the information and communication industry, Release 6.0.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arts, NRF’s IT Standards Division, www.nrf-arts.org.

  20. Bolstorff, P., Rosenbaum, R. (2007). Supply chain excellence: a handbook for dramatic improvement using the SCOR model, (2nd edn). Amacom.

    Google Scholar 

  21. CMMI Guidebook for Acquirers Team. 2007. Understanding and leveraging a supplier’s CMMI efforts: a guidebook for acquirers, software engineering institute, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianmario Motta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Motta, G., Sacco, D. (2013). The Catchers in the Rye: Students Model Enterprise Architectures. In: Spagnoletti, P. (eds) Organizational Change and Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37228-5_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics