Open Innovation for Technological Transfer

  • Pasquale ArdimentoEmail author
  • Vito Nicola Convertini
  • Giuseppe Visaggio
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 2)


This chapter presents a framework aiming to support a cooperative “innovation chain” in an Open Innovation (OI) perspective. To this end we propose a Knowledge Management System (KMS) which consists of a set of processes that constitute the Experience Factory (EF) and a platform that is the Knowledge Experience Base (KEB), which collects Knowledge Experience Packages (KEP). The KMS thus formed supports the formalization and packaging of knowledge and experience of producers and innovation transferors encouraging gradual explanation of tacit information of bearers of knowledge to facilitate the transfer while minimizing costs and risks.


Knowledge base Open innovation Business model 


  1. 1.
    Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amidon, D. M. (1998). Blueprint for 21st century innovation management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(1), 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ikujiro, N., Hirotaka, T. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation (p. 284, ISBN 978-0-19-509269-1). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ardimento, P., Caivano, D., Cimitile, M., & Visaggio, G. (2008). Empirical investigation of the efficacy and efficiency of tools for transferring software engineering knowledge. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 7(3), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jedlitschka, A., Pfahl, D. (2003). Experience-based model-driven improvement management with combined data sources from industry and Academia. Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klein, M. (2001). Combining and relating ontologies: An analysis of problems and solutions. In: A. Gomez-Perez et al. (Eds.) WS on Ont. and Inf. Sharing, Seattle, USA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malone, T. W., Crowston, K., & Herman, G. A. (2003). Organizing business knowledge-the MIT process handbook. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schneider, K., & Schwinn, T. (2001). Maturing experience base concepts at DaimlerChrysler. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 6(2), 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W3C XML Schema available at
  10. 10.
    Ardimento, P., Baldassarre, M. T., Cimitile, M., & Visaggio, G. (2009). Empirical validation of knowledge packages as facilitators for knowledge transfer. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 8(3), 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ardimento, P., Cimitile, M. (2008). An empirical study on software engineering knowledge/experience packages. In: Lecture notes in Computer Science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), 5089 LNCS, pp. 289–303.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ardimento, P., Baldassarre, M., Bianchi, A., Visaggio, G. (2003). Empirical studies as a means for technology transfer. Proceedings of the second workshop series on empirical engineering, p. 8.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ardimento, P., Boffoli, N., Cimitile, M., Masone, A., Tammaro, A. (2007). Empirical investigation on knowledge packaging supporting risk management in software processes. Proceedings of the IASTED international conference on software engineering, SE 2007, pp. 30–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pasquale Ardimento
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Vito Nicola Convertini
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Visaggio
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of Bari Aldo MoroBariItaly
  2. 2.Ser and PracticesSpin-off of the University of Bari Aldo MoroBariItaly

Personalised recommendations