Skip to main content

Using Social Network as Organizational Storytelling: A Narrative Analysis of Dooced Employees’ Blogs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 2))

Abstract

The present chapter aims at analysing the narratives of dooced bloggers. Doocing is the name we use to mean “to be fired from job for something written on or posted within a personal blog”; a name in honour of the www.dooce.com blog owned by a worker who has been fired in 2002 for having written something about her workplace her organization did not like at all. We have collected 10 blogs of dooced employees, 5 female and 5 male and we have analysed, in comparative terms their narratives after having been dooced. In particular, we present both a discourse analysis and a content analysis of the textual material we have collected. We have done the analysis of metaphors and the analysis of word occurrences and co-occurrences. For what concerns the results, it is interesting to note the different guilty perceptions and the narrative analysis of the events causing doocing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scott, A. (2005). Blogging and your corporate reputation: Part one- listen to the conversation. Factiva: Dow Jones and Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cortini, M. (2008). From corporate websites to corporate weblogs: New frontiers of organizational communication. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 2, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cortini, M. (2009). New horizons in CSP and employee/employer relationship: Challenges and risks of corporate weblogs. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 21, 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mercado-Kierkegaard, S. (2006). Blogs, lies and doocing: the next hotbed of litigation? Computer Law and Security Report, 22(2), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. (1986). Linking data. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson, T. (1981). Qualitative “versus” quantitative methods in social research. In: Küchler, M. et al. Integration von qualitativen und quantitativen Forschungsansätzen (pp. 21–35), Zuma, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scaratti, G., Cortini, M. (2013). Using Social Network as Organizational Storytelling: A Narrative Analysis of Dooced Employees’ Blogs. In: Spagnoletti, P. (eds) Organizational Change and Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37228-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics