Skip to main content

Solar System: A New Way to Model Online Communities for Open Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organizational Change and Information Systems

Abstract

Online communities are becoming an important way to support innovation through an open approach. Knowledge shared in online communities can be explored and exploited through adequate absorptive capacities. The chapter explores which factors allow an assessment of a firm’s absorptive capacity to exploit an online community as a source of innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chesbrough, H. W., & Crowther, A. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52, 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, M. W., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dougherty, D. (1992). A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levitt, T. (1962). Innovation in marketing: New perspectives for profit and growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Utterback, J. (1971). Process of technological innovation within firm. Academy of Management Journal, 14(1), 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daft, R. L. (1978). Dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davenport, T. H. (1994). Process innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frambach, R. T., Barkema, H. G., Nooteboom, B., & Wedel, M. (1998). Adoption of a service innovation in the business market: An empirical test of supply-side variables. Journal of Business Research, 41(2), 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (2004). Managing strategic innovation and change: A collection of readings. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of “communities of practice” in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Initiation adoption, and implementation of innovation: Effects of context, organization, and leaders. British Journal of Management, 17, 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta, A. K., Tesluk, P. E., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organization Science, 18, 885–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van De Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1990). Methods for studying innovation development in the minnesota innovation research program. Organization Science, 1, 313–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sawhney, M., & Prandelli, E. (2000). Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. California Management Review, 42(4), 24–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Piccoli G. (2012). Information Systems for Managers: Texts and Cases, (2nd ed). Wiley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  20. von Hippel, E. (2002). Horizontal innovation networks-by and for users. Working paper 4366-02, MIT Sloan School of Management (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32, 774–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 999–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cadiz, D., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffith, T. L. (2009). Developing and validating field measurement scales for absorptive capacity and experienced community of practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 1035–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Newey, L. R., & Shulman, A. D. (2004). Systemic absorptive capacity: Creating early-to-market returns through R&D alliances. R&D Management, 34, 495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study reserach: Design and methods (2nd ed.). CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, A. S., & Baskerville, R. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, A. S., & Hubona, G. S. (2009). Scientific basis for rigor in IS research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 33(2), 237–262.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Francesconi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Francesconi, A., Bonazzi, R., Dossena, C. (2013). Solar System: A New Way to Model Online Communities for Open Innovation. In: Spagnoletti, P. (eds) Organizational Change and Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37228-5_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics