Municipalities ‘Like’ Facebook: The Use of Social Media in Local Municipalities

  • Camilla Guttormsen
  • Øystein SæbøEmail author
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 2)


The use of Facebook in local municipalities has grown dramatically over the last few years. Local municipalities enter social media to meet people where they already are, in order to inform, discuss and receive feedback. The use of such services is rarely an integrated part of the municipalities’ communication strategies, and more knowledge is needed to explore how local municipalities could use such services to their benefit. This chapter contributes to this area of research by, based on current literature, classifying municipalities’ use of social media into six thematic areas. The explanatory potential is illustrated by conducting a qualitative case study in which a local municipality’s use of Facebook is analysed based on the suggested thematic areas. We argue that instead of viewing social media as a silver bullet, its implementation should be adapted to obtain specific achievements in one or several of the categories suggested here. Local municipalities could be more specific about the potential achievements in order to avoid a mismatch between external and internal stakeholders’ use and expectations of social media.


Social media Facebook Local municipalities 


  1. 1.
    Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (p. XIX, 301 s). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: from medieval to global assemblages (p. XIV, 493 s). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Flak, L. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Nyvang, T. (2009). The role of social networking services in eParticipation. Electronic Participation, 46–55.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Medaglia, R. (2012). eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rose, J., & Sæbø, Ø. (2010). Designing deliberation systems. The Information Society, 26(3), 228–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giddens, A. (1997). Sociology (p. XIV, 625 s). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Päivärinta, T., & Sæbø, Ø. (2006). Models of E-democracy.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Norwegian Ministry of Government Administration (2012). R.a.C.A., Public administration to be fully digitalised.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society, volume I of the information age: economy, society and culture (p. LVII, 597 s). Chichester: Wilwey-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy (p. XII, 338 s). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ihlen, Ø., & Robstad, P. (2004). Informasjon & samfunnskontakt: perspektiver og praksis (p. 242 s). Bergen: Fagbokforl.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charalabidis, Y., & Koussouris, S. (2012). Empowering open and collaborative governance: Technologies and methods for online citizen engagement in public policy making. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    (Difi), A.f.P.M.a.e. Kvalitet på nett. (2001). [cited 2012 15.05]; Available from:
  16. 16.
    Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Rev. ed. Applied social research methods series (4th ed., Vol. 5). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AgderAgderNorway

Personalised recommendations