Skip to main content

Cultural Polarization and the Role of Extremist Agents: A Simple Simulation Model

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7812))

Abstract

Cultural dynamics can be heavily influenced by extremists. To better understand this influence, temporal dynamics of an arbitrary cultural belief are simulated in a simple computational model. Extremist agents, holding an immutable and extreme belief, are used to examine the process of polarization – adoption of the extremist belief by the entire population. Two possible methods of counteracting polarization are examined, removal of the extremist agent and introducing a counter-extremist which holds an immutable belief at the opposite extreme. Eliminating the extremist agent is only effective at the onset of cultural transition, while introducing a counter-extremist is effective at any time and will lead to a dynamic intermediate belief. Finally, a parameter governing the society’s willingness to adopt new beliefs is varied. As it decreases, extremist agents are unable polarize a society. Instead the population breaks permanently into two or more belief groups. The study closes with a possible pathway for extremists to nevertheless polarize a society not open to new beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowles, S.: Warriors, Levelers, and the Role of Conflict in Human Social Evolution. Science 336, 876–879 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buskens, V., Yamaguchi, K.: A new model for information diffusion in heterogeneous social networks. Sociol. Methodol. 29, 281–325 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Axelrod, R.: An Evolutionary Approach to Norms. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 80, 1095–1111 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahajan, V., Muller, E.: Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth-Models in Marketing. J. Marketing 43, 55–68 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., Welch, I.: A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural-Change as Informational Cascades. J. Polit. Econ. 100, 992–1026 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Santos, F.C., Rodrigues, J.F., Pacheco, J.M.: Epidemic spreading and cooperation dynamics on homogeneous small-world networks. Phys. Rev. E 72, 56128 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cowan, R., Jonard, N.: Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 28, 1557–1575 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Abrahamson, E., Rosenkopf, L.: Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organ. Sci. 8, 289–309 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Delre, S.A.: The Effects of Social Networks on Innovation Diffusion and Market Dynamics. Department of Economics and Business, vol. PhD, p. 148. University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Santos, F.C., Rodrigues, J.F., Pacheco, J.M.: Graph topology plays a determinant role in the evolution of cooperation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 273, 51–55 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shutters, S.T., Cutts, B.B.: A Simulation Model of Cultural Consensus and Persistent Conflict. In: Subrahamanian, V.S., Kruglanski, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computational Cultural Dynamics, pp. 71–78. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boyd, S., Ghosh, A., Prabhakar, B., Shah, D.: Randomized Gossip Algorithms. IEEE T. Inform. Theory 52, 2508–2530 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barabási, A.L.: Scale-Free Networks: A Decade and Beyond. Science 325, 412–413 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Mendes, J.F., Dorogtsev, S.N., Povolotsky, A., Abreu, F.V., Oliveira, J.G. (eds.): Science of Complex Networks: From Biology to the Internet and WWW; CNET 2004. American Institute of Physics, Melville, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cialdini, R.B., Trost, M.R.: Social influence: social norms, conformity, and compliance. In: Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., Lindzey, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn., vol. 2, pp. 151–192. McGraw-Hill, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shutters, S.T. (2013). Cultural Polarization and the Role of Extremist Agents: A Simple Simulation Model. In: Greenberg, A.M., Kennedy, W.G., Bos, N.D. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction. SBP 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7812. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37209-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37210-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics