Skip to main content

Improving Text Retrieval Accuracy by Using a Minimal Relevance Feedback

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 348))

Abstract

In this paper we have demonstrated that the accuracy of a text retrieval system can be improved if we employ a query expansion method based on explicit relevance feedback that expands the initial query with a structured representation instead of a simple list of words. This representation, named a mixed Graph of Terms, is composed of a directed and an a-directed subgraph and can be automatically extracted from a set of documents using a method for term extraction based on the probabilistic Topic Model. The evaluation of the method has been conducted on a web repository collected by crawling a huge number of web pages from the website ThomasNet.com. We have considered several topics and performed a comparison with a baseline and a less complex structure that is a simple list of words.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhogal, J., Macfarlane, A., Smith, P.: A review of ontology based query expansion. Information Processing & Management 43(4), 866–886 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Callan, J., Croft, W.B., Harding, S.M.: The inquery retrieval system. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 78–83. Springer (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cao, G., Nie, J.Y., Gao, J., Robertson, S.: Selecting good expansion terms for pseudo-relevance feedback. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2008, pp. 243–250. ACM, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Carpineto, C., de Mori, R., Romano, G., Bigi, B.: An information-theoretic approach to automatic query expansion. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 19, 1–27 (2001), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/366836.366860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carterette, B., Allan, J., Sitaraman, R.: Minimal test collections for retrieval evaluation. In: 29th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information retrieval (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schütze, H.: Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Collins-Thompson, K., Callan, J.: Query expansion using random walk models. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2005, pp. 704–711. ACM, New York (2005), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1099554.1099727

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dumais, S., Joachims, T., Bharat, K., Weigend, A.: SIGIR 2003 workshop report: implicit measures of user interests and preferences. SIGIR Forum 37(2), 50–54 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Efthimiadis, E.N.: Query expansion. In: Williams, M.E. (ed.) Annual Review of Information Systems and Technology, pp. 121–187 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Griffiths, T.L., Steyvers, M., Tenenbaum, J.B.: Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review 114(2), 211–244 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.: The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jansen, B.J., Booth, D.L., Spink, A.: Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of web queries. Information Processing & Management 44(3), 1251–1266 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jansen, B.J., Spink, A., Saracevic, T.: Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing & Management 36(2), 207–227 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ko, Y., Seo, J.: Text classification from unlabeled documents with bootstrapping and feature projection techniques. Inf. Process. Manage. 45, 70–83 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lang, H., Metzler, D., Wang, B., Li, J.T.: Improved latent concept expansion using hierarchical markov random fields. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2010, pp. 249–258. ACM, New York (2010), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1871437.1871473

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, C.-J., Lin, Y.-C., Chen, R.-C., Cheng, P.-J.: Selecting Effective Terms for Query Formulation. In: Lee, G.G., Song, D., Lin, C.-Y., Aizawa, A., Kuriyama, K., Yoshioka, M., Sakai, T. (eds.) AIRS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5839, pp. 168–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Noam, S., Naftali, T.: The power of word clusters for text classification. In: 23rd European Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Okabe, M., Yamada, S.: Semisupervised query expansion with minimal feedback. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19, 1585–1589 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Piao, S., Rea, B., McNaught, J., Ananiadou, S.: Improving Full Text Search with Text Mining Tools. In: Horacek, H., Métais, E., Muñoz, R., Wolska, M. (eds.) NLDB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5723, pp. 301–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S.: On relevance weights with little relevance information. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 1997, pp. 16–24. ACM, New York (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Robertson, S.E.: On term selection for query expansion. J. Doc. 46, 359–364 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruthven, I.: Re-examining the potential effectiveness of interactive query expansion. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Informaion Retrieval, SIGIR 2003, pp. 213–220. ACM, New York (2003), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/860435.860475

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Salton, G., McGill, M.J.: Introduction to modern information retrieval. McGraw-Hill (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Colace, F., De Santo, M., Greco, L., Napoletano, P. (2013). Improving Text Retrieval Accuracy by Using a Minimal Relevance Feedback. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. IC3K 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 348. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37186-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37186-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37185-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37186-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics