Skip to main content

Misbehavior Discovery through Unified Software-Knowledge Models

  • Conference paper
Book cover Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 348))

  • 1122 Accesses

Abstract

UML statecharts are a widely accepted standard for modeling software behavior. But, despite the increasing importance of semantics for software behavior, semantics has been treated within UML as mere reasoning add-ons. We propose fully integration of UML statecharts with behavioral knowledge obtained from novel behavioral ontologies into a Unified Software-Knowledge model. These unified models have two important characteristics: first, misbehaviors are explicitly represented; second, behavioral ontologies generate graphs isomorphic to UML statecharts, by construction. This approach is applicable to run time measurements, to check the actual software behavior correctness and efficiency. Measurement discrepancies may trigger knowledge discovery mechanisms to update the unified models. The approach is illustrated with statechart examples from the domain of GOF software design patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. UML – Unifying Modelling Language – Version 2.4 Beta 2, OMG – Object Management Group Specification (March 2011), Web site: http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4/

  3. Selic, B.: On the Semantic Foundations of Standard UML 2.0. In: Bernardo, M., Corradini, F. (eds.) SFM-RT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3185, pp. 181–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns – Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harel, D.: On Visual Formalisms. Comm. of the ACM 31(5) (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Exman, I.: Systematic Construction of Statecharts for Design Patterns (to be published)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kurose, J.F., Ross, K.W.: Computer Networking – A Top-Down Approach, 5th edn. Pearson, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weisstein, E.W.: Graph, From MathWorld – A Wolfram Web Resource, Web Site: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Graph.html

  9. Teplitsky, M., Exman, I.: Measuring Behavioral Software Design Patterns. In: Proc. IEEEI-2006, 24th IEEE Convention of Electrical & Electronics Engineers in Israel, Eilat, Israel, pp. 384–388 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Design Pattern Ontologies, http://www.cs.uwm.edu/~alnusair/ontologies/patterns.html

  11. Kampffmeyer, H.: The Design Pattern Intent Ontology – Finding the Pattern you need. VDM Verlag Dr. Muller, Saarbrucken (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yacoub, S.M., Ammar, H.H.: A Pattern Language of Statecharts. In: Proc. PLoP 1998 Conference (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, H.D., Chuang, T.Y., Tsai, Y.L., Lee, C.S.: Ontology-based Intelligent System for Malware Behavioral Analysis. In: Proc. WCCI 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barcellos, M.P., Falbo, R.A., Rocha, A.R.: A Well-founded Software Process Behavior Ontology to Support Business Goals Monitoring in High Maturity Software Organizations. In: 14th IEEE Int. Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conf. Workshops, pp. 253–262 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clarke Jr., E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clavel, M., Egea, M., de Dios, M.A.G.: Checking Unsatisfiability for OCL Constraints. Elec. Comm. EAAST 24, 1–13 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Queralt, A., Teniente, E.: Reasoning on UML Class Diagrams with OCL Constraints. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds.) ER 2006. LNCS, vol. 4215, pp. 497–512. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Flake, S., Mueller, W.: Formal semantics of static and temporal state-oriented OCL constraints. Softw. Syst. Model (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Exman, I. (2013). Misbehavior Discovery through Unified Software-Knowledge Models. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. IC3K 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 348. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37186-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37186-8_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37185-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37186-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics