A Customisable Dashboard Display for Environmental Performance Visualisations

  • Daniel Filonik
  • Richard Medland
  • Marcus Foth
  • Markus Rittenbruch
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7822)


We conducted an exploratory study of a mobile energy monitoring tool: The Dashboard. Our point of departure from prior work was the emphasis of end-user customisation and social sharing. Applying extensive feedback, we deployed the Dashboard in real-world conditions to socially linked research participants for a period of five weeks. Participants were encouraged to devise, construct, place, and view various data feeds . The aim of our study was to test the assumption that participants, having control over their Dashboard configuration, would engage, and remain engaged, with their energy feedback throughout the trial.

Our research points to a set of design issues surrounding the adoption and continued use of such tools. A novel finding of our study is the impact of social links between participants and their continued engagement with the Dashboard. Our results also illustrate the emergence of energy-voyeurism, a form of social energy monitoring by peers.


energy monitoring environmental sustainability persuasive technology domestic environments households urban informatics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ek, K., Söderholm, P.: The devil is in the details: Household electricity saving behavior and the role of information. Energy Policy 38(3), 1578–1587 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foster, D., Lawson, S., Blythe, M., Cairns, P.: Wattsup?: motivating reductions in domestic energy consumption using social networks. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI, pp. 178–187. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    He, H., Greenberg, S., Huang, E.: One size does not fit all: applying the transtheoretical model to energy feedback technology design. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 927–936. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mankoff, J., Fussell, S., Dillahunt, T., Glaves, R., Grevet, C., Johnson, M., Matthews, D., Matthews, H., McGuire, R., Thompson, R., et al.: Increasing energy saving behaviors via social networks. In: Proceedings of ICWSM, vol. 113 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marcus, A.: Dashboards in your future. Interactions 13(1), 48–60 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nisi, V., Nicoletti, D., Nisi, R., Nunes, N.: Beyond eco-feedback: using art and emotional attachment to express energy consumption. In: Proceedings of C&C, pp. 381–382. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paulos, E., Kim, S., Kuznetsov, S.: The rise of the expert amateur: Citizen science and microvolunteerism. In: From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement, p. 167 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rowley, J.: The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science 33(2), 163 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 4th edn. Addison Wesley (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spagnolli, A., Corradi, N., Gamberini, L., Hoggan, E., Jacucci, G., Katzeff, C., Broms, L., Jönsson, L.: Eco-feedback on the go: Motivating energy awareness. Computer 44(5), 38–45 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Strengers, Y.: Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 2135–2144. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vande Moere, A., Tomitsch, M., Hoinkis, M., Trefz, E., Johansen, S., Jones, A.: Comparative Feedback in the Street: Exposing Residential Energy Consumption on House Façades. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6946, pp. 470–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yates, S., Aronson, E.: A social psychological perspective on energy conservation in residential buildings. American Psychologist 38(4), 435 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Filonik
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard Medland
    • 2
  • Marcus Foth
    • 2
  • Markus Rittenbruch
    • 2
  1. 1.Media Informatics GroupUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Urban Informatics Research Lab.Queensland University of TechnologyAustralia

Personalised recommendations