Advertisement

Persuading Consumers to Reduce Their Consumption of Electricity in the Home

  • Alan F. Smeaton
  • Aiden R. Doherty
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7822)

Abstract

Previous work has identified that providing real time feedback or interventions to consumers can persuade consumers to change behaviour and reduce domestic electricity consumption. However, little work has investigated what exactly those feedback mechanisms should be. Most past work is based on an in-home display unit, possibly complemented by lower tariffs and delayed use of non-essential home appliances such as washing machines. In this paper we focus on four methods for real time feedback on domestic energy use, developed to gauge the impact on energy consumption in homes. Their feasibility had been tested using an experimental setup of 24 households collecting minute-by-minute electricity consumption data readings over a period of 18 months. Initial results are mixed, and point to the difficulties of sustaining a reduction in energy consumption, i.e. persuading consumers to change their behaviour. Some of the methods we used exploit small group social dynamics whereby people want to conform to social norms within groups they identify with. It may be that a variety of feedback mechanisms and interventions are needed in order to sustain user interest.

Keywords

Electricity Consumption Carbon Footprint Peak Demand Electricity Usage Domestic Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ayres, I., Raseman, S., Shih, A.: Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (2012) (Online: published August 20, 2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chetty, M., Tran, D., Grinter, R.E.: Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home. In: UbiComp 2008: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 242–251. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dada, A., Staake, T., Fleisch, E.: The potential of UbiComp technologies to determine the carbon footprints of products. In: Workshop on Pervasive Persuasive Technology and Environmental Sustainability, Pervasive 2008, pp. 50–53 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Darby, S.: The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. Technical report, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fischer, C.: Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1(1), 79–104 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitzpatrick, G., Smith, G.: Technology-enabled feedback on domestic energy consumption: Articulating a set of design concerns. PERVASIVE Computing: Special Issue on Environmental Sustainability 8(1), 37–44 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldstein, N.J., Cialdini, R.B., Griskevicius, V.: A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35(3), 472–482 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hazas, M., Friday, A., Scott, J.: Look back before leaping forward: Four decades of domestic energy inquiry. IEEE Pervasive Computing 10(1), 13–19 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holmes, T.G.: Eco-visualization: combining art and technology to reduce energy consumption. In: C&C 2007: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, pp. 153–162. ACM, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin, G.: Smart metering information paper 4 - results of electricity cost-benefit analysis, customer behaviour trials and technology trials. Technical report, Irish Commission for Energy Regulation (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCalley, L.T., Midden, C.J.H.: Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology 23(5), 589–603 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ostrom, E.: Collective action and the evolution of social norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3), 137–158 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petersen, D., Steele, J., Wilkerson, J.: Wattbot: a residential electricity monitoring and feedback system. In: CHI 2009: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2847–2852. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Petroni, P., Cotti, M., Bono, O.: The new edge for the enel telegestore: An integrated solution for the remote management of electricity and gas distribution allowing a total management of the energy consumptions. In: 2009 20th International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution, pp. 1–5 (June 2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pierce, J., Schiano, D.J., Paulos, E.: Home, habits, and energy: examining domestic interactions and energy consumption. In: CHI 2010: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1985–1994. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riche, Y., Dodge, J., Metoyer, R.A.: Studying always-on electricity feedback in the home. In: CHI 2010: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1995–1998. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strengers, Y.: Smart metering demand management programs: challenging the comfort and cleanliness habitus of households. In: OZCHI 2008: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 9–16. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Olympic Peninsula Project. Gridwise demonstration project fast facts. Technical report, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Velte, D., Martin, A.: Energy services: Reducing the energy consumption of residents by behavioural changes. Technical report, BewareE (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weiss, M., Mattern, F., Graml, T., Staake, T., Fleisch, E.: Handy feedback: connecting smart meters with mobile phones. In: MUM 2009: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, pp. 1–4. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan F. Smeaton
    • 1
  • Aiden R. Doherty
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.CLARITY: Centre for Sensor Web Technologies and School of ComputingDublin City UniversityDublinIreland
  2. 2.British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research GroupUniversity of OxfordU.K.

Personalised recommendations