Abstract
Innovations in diagnostic techniques are increasing worldwide. Sensitivity and specificity are used to measure the accuracy of new dichotomous outcome diagnostic tests in the presence of an existing gold standard. The first question to be dealt is what number of subjects is sufficient to attain adequate power in the case of hypothesis testing. This chapter explains sample size issues for estimating the sensitivity and specificity and compares sensitivity and specificity under different goals for two commonly used study designs, case–control and prospective designs in paired and unpaired subjects. The chapter also explains and compares the three methods to control uncertainty under the prospective design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Arkin CF, Wachtel MS (1990) How many patients are necessary to assess test performance? JAMA 263:275–278
Buderer NMF (1996) Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity. Acad Emerg Med 3:895–900
Casagrande JT, Pike MC (1978) An improved approximate formula for calculating sample sizes for comparing two binomial distributions. Biometrics 34:483–486
Cohen J (1977) Differences between proportions. In: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic, Orlando, pp 179–214
Conner RJ (1987) Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired sample design. Biometrics 43:207–211
Flahault A, Cadilhac M, Thomas G (2005) Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol 58:859–862
Fosgate GT (2005) Modified exact sample size for binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameters estimation. Stat Med 24:2857–2866
Hintze J (2011). PASS 11. NCSS, LLC, Kaysville. http://www.ncss.com. Accessed 5 May 2012
Lachenbruch PA (1992) On the sample size for studies based upon McNemar’s test. Stat Med 11:1521–1526
Li J, Fine J (2004) On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies. Stat Med 23:2537–2550
Lu Y, Bean JA (1995) On the sample size for one-sided equivalence of sensitivities based upon McNemar’s test. Stat Med 14:1831–1839
Machin D, Campbell M, Fayers P, Pinol A (1997) Sample size tables for clinical studies, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford
Malhotra KR, Indrayan A (2010) A simple nomogram for sample size for estimating sensitivity and specificity of medical test. Indian J Ophthalmol 58:519–522
Schatzkin A, Connor RJ, Taylor PR, Bunnag B (1987) Comparing new and old screening tests when a reference procedure cannot be performed on all screenees. Am J Epidemiol 25:672–678
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: How to Use the Goal Seek Command Available in the What if Analysis Tool in the Data Menu for Solving Equations Using MS Excel 2007
Appendix: How to Use the Goal Seek Command Available in the What if Analysis Tool in the Data Menu for Solving Equations Using MS Excel 2007
To solve the equation:
-
1.
Open an Excel spreadsheet and write the value for case–control sample size obtained (cell B1)
-
2.
Write the value of the sample size obtained using the naive approach in cell B2
-
3.
Write the anticipated prevalence of disease in cell B3
-
4.
Calculate the value of the standard normal distribution using the function NORMSINV for the desired probability; for example, the upper tail for probability 0.95 under the standard normal distribution is −1.645
-
5.
Put the equation \( \frac{{B1-B3\times B2}}{{\sqrt{{B3\times (1-B3)\times B2}}}} \) in cell B5
From the Excel menu bar, click Data, locate the Data tool panel and then What if analysis item; from What if analysis select Goal Seek. The Goal Seek dialogue box appears
-
1.
Set cell: insert B5 (the equation as described above)
-
2.
To value: write the value of the standard normal of the preselected probability using the NORMSINV function
-
3.
By changing cell: insert B2
Goal Seek changes the value of cell B2 until the desired solution of the equation is obtained, i.e. −1.64485. The final value of n appears in cell B2.
How to Use the Goal Seek Command to Solve the Exact Binomial Using MS Excel 2007
-
1.
Open an Excel spreadsheet and write the value of the sample size obtained using the naive approach in cell B1 (to avoid convergence problem)
-
2.
Write the value for the case–control sample size obtained (cell B2)
-
3.
Write the anticipated prevalence of disease in cell B3
-
4.
Write the function = 1 – BINOMDIST (x, n, prev, 1) where x is number of successes, n = sample size, Prev is the probability, 1 is the cumulative probability
From the Excel menu bar, click Data, locate the Data tool panel and then the What if analysis item; from what if analysis, select Goal Seek. The Goal Seek dialogue box appears
-
1.
Set cell: insert B4, the expression as described above
-
2.
To value: insert the value of the preselected probability = 0.95
-
3.
By changing cell: insert B1
Goal Seek changes the value of cell B1 until 1 – BINOMSDIT is 0.95 and the final value of n appears in cell B1. Sometimes you may not find the exact solution; the user may try other adjacent values of sample size based on the naive approach.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Malhotra, R.K. (2013). Sample Size Considerations for Diagnostic Tests. In: Doi, S., Williams, G. (eds) Methods of Clinical Epidemiology. Springer Series on Epidemiology and Public Health. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37131-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37131-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37130-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37131-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)