Abstract
The international IPR regime based upon the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) establishes a global intellectual property (IP) regime, which obliges states to provide legal protection among other things for newly developed plant varieties and patents for inventions. This IP regime facilitates the patenting of stress-tolerant DNA in the 157 member states of the WTO. As a matter of practice, most of this patenting is confined to a relatively small group of life-sciences companies. This is resulting in a market concentration, which has important agricultural policy implications particularly for developing countries. At the same time, plant breeding methods are becoming the subject of patent protection, whereas formerly this was exclusively the subject of laws based on the international convention dealing with plant variety protection (UPOV Convention). The germplasm from which useful biological material is extracted either for patenting or the development of new plant varieties is also the subject of an evolving international regime dealing with authorized access and benefit sharing.
This chapter analyzes these issues, concluding that the impact of IP rights upon food security is becoming as significant as its impact upon access to medicines.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
WIPO Doc. WO/GA/26/9
- 2.
Ibid, Annex I, 10.
- 3.
Communication to the WTO from Kenya, on behalf of the African Group, WT/GC/W/3026, August 1999.
- 4.
WT/GC/W/362 12 October 1999.
- 5.
WT/GC/W/282.
- 6.
WT/GC/W/147.
- 7.
IP/C/W/404, 26 June 2003.
- 8.
WIPO/GRTKF/IC/16/7.
- 9.
WIPO/GRTKF/IC/17/INF/10.
- 10.
WIPO/GRTKF/IC/17/7.
- 11.
WIPO/GRTKF/IC/17/10.
- 12.
“Draft Objectives and Principles Relating to Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources Prepared at IWG 3”, WIPO/GRTKF/IWG/3/17, March 16, 2011.
References
Adcock M, Llewelyn M (2000) Micro-organisms, definitions and options under TRIPS. Quaker United Nations Office Programme, Occasional Paper 2
Alston J, Pardey G, Rosenboom J (1998) Financing agricultural research: international investment patterns and policy perspectives. World Dev 26(6):1057–1071
Attaran A, Gillespie-White L (2001) Do patents for antiretroviral drugs constrain access to AIDS treatments in Africa. J Am Med Assoc 286(15):1886–1892
Balick M, Elisabetsky E, Laird S (eds) (1996) Medicinal resources of the tropical forest: biodiversity and its importance to human health. University of Columbia Press, Columbia
Blakeney M (2009) Intellectual property rights and food security. Cab International, Wallingford, Oxford, 266 p
Blakeney M (2012) Patenting of plant varieties and plant breeding methods. J Exp Bot 63(3):1069–1074
Correa C (2000) Options for the implementation of farmers’ rights at the national level. Trade-Related Agenda, Development and Equity Working Papers, No 8. TRADE, South Centre, Geneva
Correa CM (2009) Trends in intellectual property rights relating to genetic resources for food and agriculture. Background Study Paper 49. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Rome
ETC. (2008) Patenting the “climate genes”…and capturing the climate agenda. Communiqué, no 99, May/June 2008. http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/687/03/etcgroupclimategenesfinal05_08.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
ETC. (2010) Gene giants stockpile patents on “climate-ready” crops in bid to become “biomasters” patent grab threatens biodiversity. Food Sovereignty 106. http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/pdf_file/FINAL_climate-readyComm_106_2010.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
FAO (2005) Panel of eminent experts on ethics in food and agriculture, 3rd Report. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0697e/a0697e00.htm
Frankel A (2012) Could SCOTUS Prometheus ruling be the end of human gene patents? Thomson Reuters News and Insight. http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/ViewNews.aspx?id =42785. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
Glowka L (1998) A guide to designing legal frameworks to determine access to genetic resources. IUCN, Gland
Hansen SA, Van Fleet JW (2007) Issues and options for traditional knowledge holders in protecting their intellectual property economies. In: Krattiger A, Mahoney RT, Nelsen L et al (eds) Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: a handbook of best practices. MIHR/PIPRA, Oxford, Davis, CA
Heller MA, Eisenberg RS (1998) Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280:698–701
Hestermeyer H (2007) Human rights and the WTO. The case of patents and access to medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Human Rights Council (2008) Report of the special rapporteur on the right to food, Jean Ziegler, A/HRC/7/5
IWG (2011) Draft objectives and principles relating to intellectual property and genetic resources. Prepared at IWG 3. WIPO/GRTKF/IWG/3/17, March 16, 2011. WIPO, Geneva
Joly Y (2003) Accès aux mèdicaments: le système international des brevets empêchera-t’il les pays du tiers monde de bénéficier des avantages de la pharmacogénomique? Les Cahiers de Propriété Intellectuelle 16:131–185
Joly Y (2006) Wind of change: in re Fisher and the evolution of the American biotechnology patent law. Law Context 24(1):67–84
Kate K, Laird SA (2000) The commercial use of biodiversity: access to genetic resources and benefit. Earthscan, London
Lesser W (1998) Intellectual property rights and concentration in agricultural biotechnology. AgBioForum 1(2):56–62
McNeely R (2001) Biodiversity and agricultural development: the crucial institutional issues. In: Lee R, Barrett CB (eds) Tradeoffs or synergies? Agricultural intensification, economic development and the environment. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxford, pp 399–408
Notenburg C (2009) Patenting the “Climate Genes … and Capturing the Climate Agenda”: A Communiqué by the ETC. Group’ Harvest Choice Commentary, August 7, 2009. http://www.harvestchoice.org/files/Nottenburg%202008%20HarvestChoice%20--Patenting%20the%20Climate%20Genes~2S.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
Pingali PL, Traxler G (2002) Changing focus of agricultural research: will the poor benefit from biotechnology and privatization trends?’. Food Policy 27:223–238
Somvanshi VS (2009) Patenting drought tolerance in organisms. Recent Patents DNA Gene Sequences 3:16–25. http://www.benthamscience.com/dnag/samples/dnag3-1/0003DNAG.pdf, at Table 2
WIPO (2004) WIPO Doc, WIPO/GRTKF/IC/17/INF/10. WIPO, Geneva
WIPO (2010a) Draft report of the sixteenth session of the committee (WIPO/GRTKF/IC/16/8 Prov. 2), para. 227. WIPO, Geneva
WIPO (2010b) Genetic resources: revised list of options and factual update. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/17/6, Sept 15, 2010. WIPO, Geneva
WIPO (2011) WIPO Doc, WIPO/GRTKF/IWG/3/12, January 10. WIPO, Geneva
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blakeney, M. (2013). Climate Change and Intellectual Property: Regulatory Issues. In: Kole, C. (eds) Genomics and Breeding for Climate-Resilient Crops. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37045-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37045-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37044-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37045-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)