Advertisement

Understanding Local Government Resilience: A Case Study on how the Local Government of Marikina City Reacted to the Flood in September 2009

  • Marian CruzEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Environmental Science and Engineering book series (SPRINGERENVIRON)

Abstract

In the face of climate change and its impacts, the best response of cities is to improve their resiliency. However, it is interesting to view an organization such as a local government, as one of the means to improve resilience of a city. This study aims to understand organizational resilience, i.e. a resilient local government, as a response to the impacts of climate change. In September 2009, the local government of Marikina City experienced a significant amount of stress when Tropical Storm Ketsana hit the country and devastated not only Marikina, but cities and municipalities in the metro and in the northern parts of the Philippines. The study area was one of the hardest hit by the heavy flood caused by the tropical storm. This sudden shock, which was considered by Philippine scientists as an extreme rainfall event, affected almost all inhabitants of Marikina, damaged houses and interrupted local businesses. This chapter is part of a much broader case study under the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation’s International Climate Protection Fellowship Programme.

Keywords

Climate change Resilience Local Government 

References

  1. ADPC and FAO (2006) The role of local institutions in reducing vulnerability to recurrent natural disasters and in sustainable livelihoods development, Rome. Asian Disaster Preparedness Center and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Retrieved May 2012 from ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0879e/a0879e.pdfGoogle Scholar
  2. Braes B, Brooks D (2010) Organisational resilience: a propositional study to understand and identify the essential concepts. Retrieved Aug 2012 from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=asi
  3. Brand F, Jax K (2007) Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and society, vol 12/1, Article 23. Retrieved Aug 2012 from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art23/
  4. Cordon J (2012) Marikina has no disaster reduction program—CoA. The Manila Times (July 4). Retrieved Aug 2012 from http://www.manilatimes.net/index.php/news/top-stories/26124-marikina-has-no-disaster-reduction-program–coa
  5. Duque P (1999) Philippines country report. Retrieved Feb 2012 from http://www.adrc.asia/countryreport/PHL/PHLeng99/Philippines99.htm#_Toc494261979
  6. GOP (2009) Typhoons Ondoy and Pepeng: post-disaster needs assessment. Government of the Philippines et al. Philippines. Retrieved Aug 2012 from http://gfdrr.org/docs/PDNA_Philippines_MainReport.pdf
  7. Hutter G (2011) Organizing social resilience in the context of natural hazards: a research note. Nat Hazards. doi: 10.1007/s11069-010-9705-4 Google Scholar
  8. IBRD and WB (2010) Cities and climate change: an urgent agenda. Vol 10. The International Bank for reconstruction development, the World Bank (Urban Development and Local Development). Retrieved May 2012 from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTUWM/Resources/3402321205330656272/CitiesandClimateChange.pdf
  9. IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Intergovernmental panel on climate change contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–22Google Scholar
  10. Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Environ Hazards 5(1–2):35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.hazards.2004.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee J (2011) Getting ready for a changing climate: supporting councillor’s leadership role in Adaptation. In: Resilient cities: Cities and adaptation to climate change proceedings of the global forum 2010, Local sustainability, 1, vol 1/3, pp 141–148Google Scholar
  12. LGA (2011) Framework to assist the development of the local strategy for flood risk management. A living document, 2nd edn. Local Government Association. Retrieved Sept 2012 from https://knowledgehub.local.gov.uk/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=904608&folderId=5919501&name=DLFE-44976.pdf
  13. Marikina City Government (2007) Disaster management handbook. City Government of Marikina, Metro Manila, Philippines, 80 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Müller B (ed) (2010) Urban regional resilience: how do cities and regions deal with change? Springer, Berlin, S.XIII, 163 (German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy; 2010)Google Scholar
  15. Nakasu T, Sato T, Inokuchi T, Shimokawa S, Watanabe A (2011) 2009 Typhoon Ondoy and Pepeng disasters in the Philippines. Natural disaster research report of the National Research Institute for Earth Science and disaster prevention, No. 45 (Feb). Retrieved Sep 2012 from http://dil.bosai.go.jp/publication/nied_natural_disaster/pdf/45/45-01E.pdf
  16. NDCC (2009) Final Report on Tropical Storm Ondoy (Ketsana) (Glide No. TC-2009-000205-PHL) and Typhoon Pepeng (Parma) (Glide No. TC2009-000214-PHL) (Sept 24–27 and Sept 30–Oct 10, 2009).National Disaster Coordinating Council. Retrieved March 2012 from http://ndcc.gov.ph/attachments/092_NDCC%20Update%20Final%20Report%20re%20TS%20Ondoy%20and%20Pepeng.pdf
  17. Porac JF (2002) Organizing for resilience: Discussant comments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the academy of management, DenverGoogle Scholar
  18. Resilience Alliance (2007) A research prospectus for urban resilience. A resilience alliance initiative for transitioning urban systems towards sustainable futures. Retrieved Feb 2012 from http://www.sfu.ca/dialog/undergrad/readings2007-3/boston/urban_resiliencev.pdf
  19. Resilience Alliance (2010) Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: workbook for practitioners. Version 2.0. Retrieved Nov 2011 from http://www.resalliance.org/3871.php
  20. Sutcliffe K, Vogus T (2003) Organizing for resilience. In: Cameron K, Dutton J, Quinn R (eds) Positive organizational scholarship. Foundations of a new discipline. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, pp 94–110Google Scholar
  21. UNDP and UNEP (2010) Local Governance and climate change. A discussion note: Dec 2010. United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Capital Development Fund and United Nations Environment ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  22. UNHSP (2011) Global report on human settlements 2011. Cities and climate change. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Weick K, Sutcliffe K, Obstfeld D (1999) Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. In: Staw BM, Cummings L (eds) Research in organizational behaviour, vol 21, pp 81–123Google Scholar
  24. WB and NDCC (2005) Natural disaster risk management in the Philippines: enhancing poverty alleviation through disaster reduction. The World Bank East Asia and Pacific Region rural development and National Disaster coordinating council. Retrieved Feb 2012 from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEAPREGTOPENVIRONMENT/Resources/PH_Disaster_Risk_Mgmt.pdf
  25. Wildavsky A (1988) Searching for safety. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  26. WMO and GWP (2008) Urban flood risk management. A tool for integrated flood management. World Meteorological Organization and Global Water Partnership/Associated Programme on Flood Management. Retrieved August 2012 from http://apfm.info/pdf/ifm_tools/Tools_Urban_Flood_Risk Management.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Perk Technical Consultants CorporationPasig CityPhilippines
  2. 2.Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung/FoundationBonnGermany
  3. 3.Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional DevelopmentDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations