Skip to main content

Preparing Teacher Educators in U.S. Doctoral Programs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: New Frontiers of Educational Research ((NFER))

Abstract

To a large extent, the quality of future generations of K-12 teachers and their students’ performance is dependent on how well teacher educators, the teachers of teachers, are prepared in doctoral programs. Preparing quality teacher educators in academe encompasses being able to conduct high-quality educational research and be strong teacher leaders. Currently, teacher educators are prepared in either a Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) or Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree program in the United States. In this paper, I discuss implications of these two degree programs and the challenges of preparing U.S. teacher educators in attaining both educational research literacy and teaching competence.

A variation of this article has been published in Lin, E., Wang, J., Spalding, E., Klecka, C.L., & Odell, S. J. (2011). Toward strengthening the preparation of teacher educator-researchers in doctoral programs and beyond. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 239–245. doi: 10.1177/0022487110397816

Author Note

Paper submitted to The 1st Global Teacher Education Summit.

Sub-theme 4: Who Will Prepare Teachers in the Twenty-First Century: Teacher Educators?

October, 2011

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is anticipated that the first nationwide assessment of US graduate schools and colleges of education in the field of educational research, including teacher education, will be conducted jointly by the American Educational Research Association (AERA) and the National Academy of Education (NAEd). This study proposes to collect data that may be used to establish benchmarks and quality criteria to improve education research doctoral programs nationwide. In addition, this study aims to assess the extent and nature of methodological preparation of doctoral students in educational research.

References

  • Abell SK, Rogers M, Hanuscin DL, Lee MH, Gagnon MJ (2009) Preparing the next generation of science teacher educators: a model for developing PCK for teaching science teachers. J Sci Teach Educ 20(1):77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DG (1983) Differentiation of the Ed.D. and Ph.D. in education. J Teach Educ 34(3):55–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boote BN, Beile P (2005) Scholars before researchers: on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educ Res 34(6):3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer E (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvot JB (2009) Grounding practice in scholarship, grounding scholarship in practice: knowledge of a mathematics teacher educator-researcher. Teach Teach Educ 25(2):357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith M, Zeichner K (eds) (2005) Studying teacher education: the report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill DD, Morrison JL (1985) Ed.D. and Ph.D. research training in the field of higher education: a survey and a proposal. The Review of Higher Education 8(2):169–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart M, DeHaan RL (2005) Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education researchers. Educ Res 34(4):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiegener MK (2009) Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: summary report 2007–2008. National Science Foundation, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde CM (2007) Signature pedagogies in doctoral education: are they adaptable for the preparation of education researchers? Educ Res 36(6):344–351. doi:10:3101/0013189X07308301

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad J (1990) Better teachers for our nation’s schools. Phi Delta Kappan 72(3):185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman P (2004) The research we want, the research we need: a teacher educator’s perspective. Division K Vice Presidential Address, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman P (2008) Responding to our critics: from crisis to opportunity in research on teacher education. J Teach Educ 59(10):10–23. doi:10.1177/0022487107310748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman PL, Wilson SM, Shulman LS (1989) Teachers of substance: subject matter knowledge for teaching. In: Reynolds M (ed) The knowledge base for beginning teachers. Pergamon, New York, pp 23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree DF (2003) The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educ Res 32(4):13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree DF (2004) The trouble with ed schools. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree DF (2008) The dysfunctional pursuit of relevance in education research. Educ Res 37(7):421–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagemann E (2000) An elusive science: the troubling history of educational research. In: Lagemann E, Shulman L (eds) Issues in education research: problems and possibilities. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levine A (2006) Educating school teachers. The Education Schools Project, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine A (2007) Educating researchers. The Education Schools Project, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin E, Wang J, Klecka CL, Odell SJ, Spalding E (2010) Judging research in teacher education. J Teach Educ 61(4):295–301. doi:10.1177/0022487110374013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin E, Wang J, Spalding E, Klecka CL, Odell SJ (2011) Toward strengthening the preparation of teacher educator-researchers in doctoral programs and beyond. J Teach Educ 62(3):239–245. doi:10.1177/0022487110397816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie DC (1975) Schoolteacher: a sociological study. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran J (2006) Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz MH (2001) Intellectual border crossing in graduate education: a report from the field. Educ Res 30(5):12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TR, Haro A (1999) Poles apart: reconciling the dichotomies in education research. In: Lagemann EC, Shulman LS (eds) Issues in education research: problems and possibilities. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 42–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss PA, Pellegrino JW, Schneider BL, Duran RP, Eisenhart MA, Erickson FD, Grant CA, Green JL, Hedges LV, Levine FJ (2006) Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications: American Educational Research Association. Educ Res 35(6):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Vriesenga M (2005) Developing professionally anchored dissertations: lessons from innovative programs. Sch Leadersh Rev 1(1):33–57

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Education (2009) Teacher quality: education policy white paper. Retrieved from www.naeducation.org/Teacher_Quality_White_Paper.pdf. on 12.20.10

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2002) Scientific research in education. In: Shavelson RJ, Towne L (eds) Committee on Scientific Principles for Educational Research. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann A, Pallas A, Peterson P (2008) Exploring the investment: four universities’ experiences with the Spencer foundation’s research training grant program: a retrospective. Teach Coll Rec 110(7):1477–1503

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallas A (2001) Preparing education doctoral students for epistemological diversity. Educ Res 30(5):6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld A (1999) The core, the canon, and the development of research skills: issues in the preparation of educational researchers. In: Lagemann E, Shulman LS (eds) Issues in education research: problems and possibilities. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 166–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman LS (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res 15(2):4–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman LS (1987) Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harv Educ Rev 57:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman LS (2003) Remarks presented at A national conversation about doctoral programs for future leaders in educational research. Washington, DC. http//www7.nationalacademies.org/core/. Accessed 12 Sept 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman LS, Golde CM, Bueschel AC, Garabedian KJ (2006) Reclaiming education’s doctorates: a critique and a proposal. Educ Res 35(3):25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Towne L, Wise L, Winters T (eds) (2005) Advancing scientific research in education. National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiland S (2008) Research apprenticeship at Michigan State University’s college of education: the collegial and the confidential. Teach Coll Rec 110(7):458–1476

    Google Scholar 

  • White S, O’Neal LC (2002) A new policy to transform teacher education: doctoral preparation of teacher-scholars. J Instr Psychol 29(1):44–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SM (2006) Finding a canon and core: mediations on the preparation of teacher educator-researchers. J Teach Educ 57(3):315–325. doi:10.1177/0022487105285895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SM, Tamir E (2008) The evolving field of teacher education: how understanding challenge(r)s might improve the preparation of teachers. In: Cochran-Smith M, Feiman-Nemser S, John McIntyre D, Demers KE (eds) Handbook of research on teacher education: enduring questions in changing contexts, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York, pp 908–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S, Shulman L, Richert A (1987) “150 different ways of knowing”: representations of knowledge in teaching. In: Calderhead J (ed) Exploring teachers’ thinking. Cassell, Eastbourne, pp 104–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Young LJ (2001) Border crossings and other journeys: re-envisioning the doctoral preparation of educational researchers. Educ Res 30(5):3–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner K (2005) A research agenda for teacher education. In: Cochran-Smith M, Zeichner K (eds) Studying teacher education: the report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Lawrence, Mahwah, pp 737–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimpher NL, Sherrill JA (1996) Professor, teachers, and leaders in SCDES. In: Sikula J (ed) Handbook of research on teacher education. Macmillan, New York, pp 279–305

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Lin Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lin, E. (2013). Preparing Teacher Educators in U.S. Doctoral Programs. In: Zhu, X., Zeichner, K. (eds) Preparing Teachers for the 21st Century. New Frontiers of Educational Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36970-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36970-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36969-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36970-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics