We Still Don’t Know How Much BPMN Is Enough, But We Are Getting Closer
Process models expressed in BPMN typically rely on a small subset of all available symbols. In our 2008 study, we examined the composition of these subsets, and found that the distribution of BPMN symbols in practice closely resembles the frequency distribution of words in natural language. We offered some suggestions based on our findings, how to make the use of BPMN more manageable and also outlined ideas for further development of BPMN. Since this paper was published it has provoked spirited debate in the BPM practitioner community, prompted the definition of a modeling standard in US government, and helped shape the next generation of the BPMN standard.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Lassen, K.B., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Complexity Metrics for Workflow Nets Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 610–626Google Scholar
- 7.Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Green, P.: Business Process Modeling: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (2009) 333–363Google Scholar
- 9.Swanson, E.B.: Information System Implementation: Bridging the Gap Between Design and Utilization. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois (1988)Google Scholar
- 10.White, S.A., Miers, D.: BPMN Modeling and Reference Guide. Lighthouse Point, Florida, Future Strategies (2008)Google Scholar
- 11.Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style, 2nd Edition, with BPMN Implementer's Guide: A structured approach for business process modeling and implementation using BPMN 2.0. Cody-Cassidy Press, Aptos, CA (2011).Google Scholar
- 12.Object Management Group: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN 2.0). OMG Specification dtc/11-01-03. Framingham, MA (2011)Google Scholar
- 13.WfMC: XML Process Definition Language (XPDL), WfMC Standards. WFMC-TC-1025, http://www.wfmc.org, 2001.