Abstract
This short articles discusses the evolution of research in composition technologies, from workflows to mashups. It emphasizes the failures of composition technologies and makes the case for domain-specific workflows as a possible successful way to leverage composition technologies.
Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
F. Casati, S. Ilnicki, L.J. Jin, V. Krishnamoorthy and M.C. Shan, Adaptive and Dynamic Service Composition in eFlow, Procs of Caise’00, Sweden. Springer.
G. Alonso, F. Casati, H. Kuno, and V. Machiraju. Web Services Concepts, Architectures and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
R. Botha and J.Eloff, Separation of duties for access control enforcement in workflow environments, IBM Systems Journal 40 (3), 2001.
Luc Clement, Andrew Hately, Claus von Riegen, and Tony Rogers. UDDI Version 3. OASIS UDDI Spec TC, 2004.
Acknowledgements
A big thanks to the friends, colleagues, and co-authors of the original CAiSE paper: Ski Ilnicki, LiJie Jin, Vasudev Krishnamoorthy, and Ming-Chien Shan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Casati, F. (2013). Promises and Failures of Research in Dynamic Service Composition. In: Bubenko, J., Krogstie, J., Pastor, O., Pernici, B., Rolland, C., Sølvberg, A. (eds) Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36926-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36926-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36925-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36926-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)