Abstract
In this paper we present a novel framework for resolving bridging anaphora. We argue that anaphora, particularly bridging anaphora, is used as a shortcut device similar to the use of compound nouns. Hence, the two natural language usage phenomena would have to be based on the same theoretical framework. We use an existing theory on compound nouns to test its validity for anaphora usages. To do this, we used human annotators to interpret indirect anaphora from naturally occurring discourses. The annotators were asked to classify the relations between anaphor-antecedent pairs into relation types that have been previously used to describe the relations between a modifier and the head noun of a compound noun. We obtained very encouraging results with an average Fleiss’s κ value of 0.66 for inter-annotation agreement. The results were evaluated against other similar natural language interpretation annotation experiments and were found to compare well.
In order to determine the prevalence of the proposed set of anaphora relations we did a detailed analysis of a subset 20 newspaper articles. The results obtained from this also indicated that a majority (98%) of the relations could be described by the relations in the framework. The results from this analysis also showed the distribution of the relation types in the genre of news paper article discourses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barker, K., Szpakowicz, S.: Semi-automatic recognition of noun modifier relationships (1998)
Bean, D., Riloff, E.: Corpus-based identification of non-anaphoric noun phrases. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics, pp. 373–380. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown (1999)
Bunescu, R.: Associative anaphora resolution: A web-based approach. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2003 Workshop on the Computational Treatment of Anaphora, pp. 47–52 (2003)
Butnariu, C., Veale, T.: A concept-centered approach to noun-compound interpretation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2008, vol. 1, pp. 81–88. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2008), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1599081.1599092
Davies, M.: Corpus of contemporary american english (2010), http://www.americancorpus.org
Downing, P.: On the creation and use of english compound nouns. Language 53(4), 810–842 (1977)
Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Bradford Books (1998)
Fraurud, K.: Definiteness and the processing of noun phrases in natural discourse. Journal of Semantics 7(4), 395–433 (1990)
Girju, R.: Improving the interpretation of noun phrases with crosslinguistic information. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp. 568–575 (2007)
Girju, R., Moldovan, D., Tatu, M., Antohe, D.: On the semantics of noun compounds. Computer Speech and Language 19(4), 479–496 (2005)
Hendrickx, I., Kim, S.N., Kozareva, Z., Nakov, P., Séaghdha, D.O., Padó, S., Pennacchiotti, M., Romano, L., Szpakowicz, S.: Semeval-2010 task 8: Multi-way classification of semantic relations between pairs of nominals. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval 2010, pp. 33–38. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2010), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1859664.1859670
Hobbs, J.R.: Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 67, 67–90 (1979)
Kim, S.N., Nakov, P.: Large-scale noun compound interpretation using bootstrapping and the web as a corpus. In: The Proceeding of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP, Edinburgh, UK (2011)
Kim, S.-N., Baldwin, T.: Automatic Interpretation of Noun Compounds Using WordNet Similarity. In: Dale, R., Wong, K.-F., Su, J., Kwong, O.Y. (eds.) IJCNLP 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3651, pp. 945–956. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Kim, S.N., Baldwin, T.: Interpreting semantic relations in noun compounds via verb semantics. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Main Conference Poster Sessions, COLING-ACL 2006, pp. 491–498. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2006), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1273073.1273137
Lauer, M.: Corpus statistics meet the noun compound: some empirical results. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 1995, pp. 47–54. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (1995), http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/981658.981665
Levi, J.: Where do all those other adjectives come from. Chicago Linguistic Society 9, 332–354 (1973)
Levi, J.N.: The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. Academic Press, New York (1978)
Li, C.N.: Semantics and the Structure of Compounds in Chinese. Ph.D. thesis, University of Carlifornia dissertation (1971)
Nakov, P.: Noun compound interpretation using paraphrasing verbs: Feasibility study (2008), http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~nakov/selected_papers_list/aimsa2008.pdf
Nastase, V., Sayyad-Shiarabad, J., Sokolova, M., Szpakowicz, S.: Learning noun-modifier semantic relations with corpus-based and wordnet-based features. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Aritficial Intelligence, vol. 21(Part 1), pp. 781–787 (2006)
Nastase, V., Szpakowicz, S.: Exploring noun-modifier semantic relations. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computational Semantics (2003)
Ó Séaghdha, D.: Annotating and learning compound noun semantics. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the ACL: Student Research Workshop, ACL 2007, pp. 73–78. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2007), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1557835.1557852
Poesio, M., Vieira, R., Teufel, S.: Resolving bridging references in unrestricted text. In: Proceedings of a Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution for Unrestricted Texts, ANARESOLUTION 1997, pp. 1–6. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown (1997), http://portal.acm.org/linebreakcitation.cfm?id=1598819.1598820
Sanders, T.: Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15(1), 1–35 (1992)
Tratz, S., Hovy, E.: A taxonomy, dataset, and classifier for automatic noun compound interpretation. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2010, pp. 678–687. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2010), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1858681.1858751
Vieira, R., Poesio, M.: An empirically based system for processing definite descriptions. Computational Linguistics 26(4), 539–593 (2000), http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/089120100750105948
Warren, B.: Semantic patterns of noun-noun compounds. Gothenburg studies in English. Acta Universitatis thoburgensis (1978)
Zimmer, K.E.: Some general observations about nominal compounds. Working Papers on Language Universals, pp. C1–C21 (1971)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nand, P., Yeap, W. (2013). A Framework for Interpreting Bridging Anaphora. In: Filipe, J., Fred, A. (eds) Agents and Artificial Intelligence. ICAART 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 358. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36907-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36907-0_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36906-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36907-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)