Advertisement

Researching Nonverbal Communication Strategies in Human-Robot Interaction

  • Hirotaka Osawa
  • Michita Imai
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 358)

Abstract

We propose an alternative approach to find each robot’s unique communication strategies. In this approach, the human manipulator behaves as if she/he becomes the robot and finds the optimal communication strategies using attachable and detachable robot’s shapes and modalities. We implement the system including a reconfigurable body robot, an easier manipulation system, and a recording system to evaluate the validity of our method. We evaluate a block-assembling task by the system by turning on and off the modality of the robot’s head. Subsequently, the robot’s motion during player’s motion significantly increases whereas the ratio of confirmatory behavior significantly decreases in the head-fixed design. In this case, the robot leads the users and the user follows the robot as in the turn-taking communication style of the Head-free condition.

Keywords

Design Methodology Human Robot Interaction Human Interface 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    del Pobil, A.P., Sudar, S.: Lecture Notes of the Workshop on the Interaction Science Perspective on HRI: Designing Robot Morphology. ACM/IEEE Human Robot Interaction (2010), http://www.robot.uji.es/research/events/hri2010
  2. 2.
    Blow, M., Dautenhahn, K., Appleby, A., Nehaniv, C., Lee, D.: Perception of Robot Smiles and Dimensions for Human-Robot Interaction Design. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Int Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 469–474. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanda, T., Kamasima, M., Imai, M., Ono, T., Sakamoto, D., Ishiguro, H., Anzai, Y.: A humanoid robot that pretends to listen to route guidance from a human. Autonomous Robots 22(1), 87–100 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, M.K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., Srinivasa, S., Rybski, P.: Gracefully mitigating breakdowns in robotic services. In: Proceedings of Human Robot Interaction, pp. 203–210 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shiwa, T., Kanda, T., Imai, M., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: How Quickly Should a Communication Robot Respond? Delaying Strategies and Habituation Effects. International Journal of Social Robotics 1(2), 141–155 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirai, K., Hirose, M., Haikawa, Y., Takenaka, T.: The development of honda humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1321–1326 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, S., Kleinehagenbrock, M., Fritsch, J., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G.: BIRON, let me show you something: evaluating the interaction with a robot companion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 3, pp. 2827–2834 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsukuma, K., Handa, H., Yokoyama, K.: Vision-based manipulation system for autonomous mobile robot ‘SmartPal’. In: Proceedings of Japan Robot Association Conference, 3D28 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsumoto, N., Fujii, H., Goan, M., Okada, M.: Minimal communication design of embodied interface. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Active Media Technology (AMT), pp. 225–230 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bartneck, C.: eMuu – An InterFace for the HomeLab. In: Poster at the Philips User Interface Conference, UI 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamaji, Y., Miyake, T., Yoshiike, Y., De Silva, P.R.S., Okada, M.: STB: human-dependent sociable trash box. In: Proceedings of Human Robot Interaction, pp. 197–198 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shibata, T., Mitsui, T., Wada, K., Tanie, K.: Subjective Evaluation of Seal Robot: Paro – Tabulation and Analysis of Questionnaire Results. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 14(1), 13–19 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fujita, M., Kitano, H.: Development of an Autonomous Quadruped Robot for Robot Entertainment. Autonomous Robots 5, 7–18 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Osawa, H., Ohmura, R., Imai, M.: Using Attachable Humanoid Parts for Realizing Imaginary Intention and Body Image. International Journal of Social Robotics 1(1), 109–123 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osawa, H., Orszulak, J., Godfrey, K.M., Coughlin, J.: Maintaining Learning Motivation of Older People by Combining Household Appliance with a Communication Robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 5310–5316 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kelley, J.F.: An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 2(1), 26–41 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Steinfeld, A., Jenkins, O.C., Scassellati, B.: The oz of wizard: simulating the human for interaction research. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI 2009), pp. 101–108. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuzuoka, H., Oyama, S., Yamazaki, K., Suzuki, K., Mitsuishi, M.: GestureMan: A Mobile Robot that Embodies a Remote Instructor’s Actions. In: Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 155–162 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Glas, D.F., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Simultaneous Teleoperation of Multiple Social Robots. In: Proceedings of Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 311–318 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee, J.K., Stiehl, W.D., Toscano, R.L., Breazeal, C.: Semi-Autonomous Robot Avatar as a Medium for Family Communication and Education. In: Proceedings of Advanced Robotics, pp. 1925–1949 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    NaturalPoint, OptiTrack s250e (2010), http://www.naturalpoint.com/optitrack/products/s250e
  23. 23.
    Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G.: A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696–735 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cassell, J., Thórisson, K.R.: The Power of a Nod and a Glance: Envelope vs. Emotional Feedback in Animated Conversational Agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13, 519–538 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chao, C., Thomaz, A.L.: Turn Taking for Human-Robot Interaction. In: Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium (Applied Artificial Intelligence) (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hirotaka Osawa
    • 1
  • Michita Imai
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyKeio UniversityKohoku-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations