Skip to main content

The Relative Agreement Model of Opinion Dynamics in Populations with Complex Social Network Structure

  • Conference paper
Complex Networks IV

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 476))

  • 1291 Accesses

Abstract

Research in the field of Opinion Dynamics studies how the distribution of opinions in a population of agents alters over time, as a consequence of interactions among the agents and/or in response to external influencing factors. One of most widely-cited items of literature in this field is a paper by Deffuant et al. (2002) introducing the Relative Agreement (RA) model of opinion dynamics, published in the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS). In a recent paper published in the same journal, Meadows & Cliff (2012) questioned some of the results published in Deffuant et al. (2002) and released public-domain source-code for implementations of the RA model that follow the description given by Deffuant et al., but which generate results with some significant qualitative differences. The results published by Meadows & Cliff (2012) follow the methodology of Deffuant et al. (2002), simulating a population of agents in which, in principle, any agent can influence the opinion of any other agent. That is, the ”social network” of the simulated agents is a fully connected graph. In contrast, in this paper we report on the results from a series of empirical experiments where the social network of the agent population is non-trivially structured, using the stochastic network construction algorithm introduced by Klemm & Eguiluz (2002), which allows variation of a single real-valued control parameter μ KE over the range [0,1], and which produces network topologies that have ”small world” characteristics when μ KE =0 and that have ”scale free” characteristics when μ KE =1. Using the public-domain source-code published in JASSS, we have studied the response of the dynamics of the RA model of opinion dynamics in populations of agents with complex social networks. Our primary findings are that variations in the clustering coefficient of the social networks (induced by altering μ KE ) have a significant effect on the opinion dynamics of the RA model operating on those networks, whereas the effect of variations in average shortest path length is much weaker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amblard, F., Deffuant, G.: The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the Relative Agreement opinion dynamics. Physica A 343, 725–738 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • BarabáSi, A., Albert, R.: Emergence of Scaling in Random Network. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S., Brehm, J.: Psychological Reactance: a theory of freedom and control. Academic Press, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, M.: Reaching a Consensus. J. Am. Statis. Assoc. 69(345), 118–121 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems 3, 87–98 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G., Faure, T.: How can extremism prevail? J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(4), 1 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffuant, G.: Comparing Extremism Propagation Patterns in Continuous Opinion Models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9(3), 8 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, N.: Choice Shift & Group Polarization. Am. Socio. Rev. 64(6), 856–875 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(3), 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemm, K., Eguíluz, V.: Growing Scale-Free Networks with Small-World Behavior. Physical Review E 65, 057102 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, U.: A Discrete Nonlinear and Non-Autonomous Model of Consensus Formation. In: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Difference Equations, August 27-31, pp. 227–236 (1998-2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, J., Deffuant, G.: The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the relative agreement opinion dynamics. Physica A 343, 725–738 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, J.: Continuous Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence: A Survey. International Journal of Modern Physics C 18, 1–20 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, M., Cliff, D.: Reexamining the Relative Agreement Model of Opinion Dynamics. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 15(4), 4 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, M., Cliff, D.: The Relative Agreement model of opinion dynamics in populations with complex social network structure (forthcoming, 2013) (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D., Strogatz, S.: Collective Dynamics of Small-World Networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Meadows .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meadows, M., Cliff, D. (2013). The Relative Agreement Model of Opinion Dynamics in Populations with Complex Social Network Structure. In: Ghoshal, G., Poncela-Casasnovas, J., Tolksdorf, R. (eds) Complex Networks IV. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 476. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36843-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36844-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics