Skip to main content

Abstract

Because the right ventricle (RV) has a much more complex geometry compared to the left ventricle, assessment of its volume and function is more challenging using two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic image planes. This is due to the fact that no simple three-dimensional (3D) geometric model accurately represents this chamber even in the absence of disease. Although these conditions would clearly favor a 3D analysis, it is challenging to find an adequate acoustic window because of the retrosternal location of the RV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mangion JR (2010) Right ventricular imaging by two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiography. Curr Opin Cardiol 25:423–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W et al (2012) EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13:1–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Niemann PS, Pinho L, Balbach T et al (2007) Anatomically oriented right ventricular volume measurements with dynamic three-dimensional echocardiography validated by 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1668–1676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leibundgut G, Rohner A, Grize L et al (2010) Dynamic assessment of right ventricular volumes and function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: a comparison study with magnetic resonance imaging in 100 adult patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:116–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shiota T (2009) 3D echocardiography: evaluation of the right ventricle. Curr Opin Cardiol 24:410–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gopal AS, Chukwu EO, Iwuchukwu CJ et al (2007) Normal values of right ventricular size and function by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:445–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khoo NS, Young A, Occleshaw C et al (2009) Assessments of right ventricular volume and function using three-dimensional echocardiography in older children and adults with congenital heart disease: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:1279–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grewal J, Majdalany D, Syed I et al (2010) Three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volume and function in adult patients with congenital heart disease: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:127–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nesser HJ, Tkalec W, Patel AR et al (2006) Quantitation of right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography in patients: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide ventriculography. Echocardiography 23:666–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Groote P, , Millaire A, , Foucher-Hossein C et al (1998) Right ventricular ejection fraction is an independent predictor of survival in patients with moderate heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:948–954

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pfisterer M, Emmenegger H, Soler M, Burkart F (1986) Prognostic significance of right ventricular ejection fraction for persistent complex ventricular arrhythmias and/or sudden cardiac death after first myocardial infarction: relation to infarct location, size and left ventricular function. Eur Heart J 7:289–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghio S, Klersy C, Magrini G et al (2010) Prognostic relevance of the echocardio graphic assessment of right ventricular function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J Cardiol 140:272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gavazzi A, Berzuini C, Campana C et al (1997) Value of right ventricular ejection fraction in predicting short-term prognosis of patients with severe chronic heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 16:774–785

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bleeker GB, Steendijk P, Holman ER et al (2006) Assessing right ventricular function: the role of echocardiography and complementary technologies. Heart 92(Suppl 1):i19–i26

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1440–1463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaul S, Tei C, Hopkins JM, Shah PM (1984) Assessment of right ventricular function using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 107:526–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenkins C, Chan J, Bricknell K et al (2007) Reproducibility of right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with cardiac MRI. Chest 131:1844–1851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang L, Handschumacher MD, Hibberd MG et al (1994) Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of right ventricular volume: in vitro comparison with two-dimensional methods. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 7:150–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang L, Siu SC, Handschumacher MD et al (1994) Three-dimensional echo cardiography. In vivo validation for right ventricular volume and function. Circulation 89:2342–2350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujimoto S, Mizuno R, Nakagawa Y et al (1998) Estimation of the right ventricular volume and ejection fraction by transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography. A validation study using magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Card Imaging 14:385–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schindera ST, Mehwald PS, Sahn DJ, Kececioglu D (2002) Accuracy of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for quantifying right ventricular volume: static and pulsatile flow studies in an anatomic in vitro model. J Ultrasound Med 21:1069–1075

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang L, Levine RA, Weyman AE (1997) Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volume and function. Echocardiography 14:189–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kjaergaard J, Petersen CL, Kjaer A et al (2006) Evaluation of right ventricular volume and function by 2D and 3D echocardiography compared to MRI. Eur J Echocardiogr 7:430–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chua S, Levine RA, Yosefy C et al (2009) Assessment of right ventricular function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography improves accuracy and decreases interobserver variability compared with conventional two-dimensional views. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:619–624

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shiota T, Jones M, Chikada M et al (1998) Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for determining right ventricular stroke volume in an animal model of chronic right ventricular volume overload. Circulation 97:1897–1900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen G, Sun K, Huang G (2006) In vitro validation of right ventricular volume and mass measurement by real-time three-dimensional echocardio graphy. Echocardiography 23:395–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L et al (2010) Multimodality comparison of quantitative volumetric analysis of the right ventricle. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:10–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoch M, Vasilyev NV, Soriano B et al (2007) Variables influencing the accuracy of right ventricular volume assessment by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: an in vitro validation study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:456–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tamborini G, Brusoni D, Torres Molina JE et al (2008) Feasibility of a new generation three-dimensional echocardiography for right ventricular volumetric and functional measurements. Am J Cardiol 102:499–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tamborini G, Marsan NA, Gripari P et al (2010) Reference values for right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: evaluation in a large series of normal subjects. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:109–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ostenfeld E, Carlsson M, Shahgaldi K et al (2012) Manual correction of semi-automatic three-dimensional echocardiography is needed for right ventricular assessment in adults; validation with cardiac magnetic resonance. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 10:1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shimada YJ, Shiota M, Siegel RJ, Shiota T (2010) Accuracy of right ventricular volumes and function determined by three-dimensional echocardio graphy in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-an alysis study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:943–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van der Hulst AE, , Roest AA, , Holman ER et al (2011) Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: segmental analysis of the right ventricle in patients with repaired tetralogy of fallot. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:1183–1190

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vitarelli A, Sardella G, Roma AD et al (2012) Assessment of right ventricular function by three-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial strain imaging in adult atrial septal defect before and after percutaneous closure. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:1905–1916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Prakasa KR, Dalal D, Wang J et al (2006) Feasibility and variability of three dimensional echocardiography in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 97:703–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bello V, Conte L, Delle Donne MG et al (2013) Advantages of real time three-dimensional echocardiography in the assessment of right ventricular volumes and function in patients with pulmonary hypertension compared with conventional two-dimensional echocardiography. Echocardiography 30:820–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Grapsa J, Gibbs JS, Dawson D et al (2012) Morphologic and functional remodeling of the right ventricle in pulmonary hypertension by real time three dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 109:906–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kong D, Shu X, Dong L et al (2013) Right ventricular regional systolic function and dyssynchrony in patients with pulmonary hypertension evaluated by three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:649–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

von Bardeleben, S., Buck, T., Franke, A. (2015). The right ventricle. In: Buck, T., Franke, A., Monaghan, M. (eds) Three-dimensional Echocardiography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36799-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36799-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36798-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36799-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics