On the Extended Clinical Workflows for Personalized Healthcare

  • Milan Zdravković
  • Miroslav Trajanović
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 144)

Abstract

There are many cases in the clinical practice where using personalized medical products could decrease the cost of treatment and risk of possible complications. However, due to the large costs and long manufacturing lead time, the medical products are customized to the individual patient’s needs only in a few critical treatments. One of the main cost factors of the collaboration between the clinical centres and custom medical product suppliers is uptake of human effort in exchange of knowledge between two domains and corresponding issues. In this paper, we use the concepts of the networked enterprises to define the extended clinical workflow which spans the medical and manufacturing practice. We identify the associated systems infrastructure of this workflow and related interoperability issues. The extended workflow is demonstrated on the case study for custom orthopedic implants manufacturing.

Keywords

Ontology Enterprise Interoperability Supply Chain Management SCOR 

References

  1. 1.
    Fenner, J.W., Brook, B., Clapworthy, G., Coveney, P.V., Feipel, V., Gregersen, H., Hose, D.R., Kohl, P., Lawford, P., McCormack, K.M., Pinney, D., Thomas, S.R., Van Sint Jan, S., Waters, S., Viceconti, M.: The EuroPhysiome, STEP and a roadmap for the virtual physiological human. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (July 2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clapworthy, G., Viceconti, M., Coveney, P.V., Kohl, P.: The virtual physiological human: building a framework for computational biomedicine I. Editorial. Philos. Transact. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 366(1878), 2975–2978 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Welsh, E., Jirotka, M., Gavaghan, D.: Post-genomic science: cross-disciplinary and largescale collaborative research and its organizational and technological challenges for the scientific research process. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 364, 1533–1549 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    VPH roadmap. Seeding the EuroPhysiome: a roadmap to the virtual physiological human (2008), http://www.europhysiome.org
  5. 5.
    Bentel, G.C., Marks, L.B., Sherouse, G.W., Spencer, D.P.: A customized head and neck support system. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics 32(1), 245–248 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zdravković. M., Trajanović, M., Stojković, M., Vitković, N., Mišić, D.: A case of using the Semantic Interoperability Framework for custom orthopedic implants manufacturing. Annual Reviews in Control 36(2) (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yassine, A., Kim, K.C., Roemer, T., Holweg, M.: Investigating the role of IT in customized product design. Production Planning & Control 15(4) (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hess, J.R., Holcomb, J.B., Hoyt, D.B.: Damage control resuscitation: the need for specific blood products to treat the coagulopathy of trauma. Transfusion 46(5), 685–686 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Puschmann, T.: Customer relationship management in the pharmaceutical industry. In: 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 3-6 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keenan, J., Chakrabarty, G., Newman, J.H.: Treatment of supracondylar femoral fracture above total knee replacement by custom made hinged prosthesis. Knee 7, 165–170 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Browne, J., Zhang, J.: Extended and virtual enterprises – similarities and differences. International Journal of Agile Management Systems 1(1), 30–36 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sánchez, N.G., Apolinar, D., Zubiaga, G., Atahualpa, J., González, I., Molina, A: Virtual Breeding Environment: A First Approach to Understanding Working and Sharing Principles. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications, Geneva, Switzerland, February 23-25 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harris, M.R., Ruggieri, A.P., Chute, C.G.: From Clinical Records to Regulatory Reporting: Formal Terminologies as Foundation. Health Care Financing Review 24(3), 118 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gibson, I., Harrysson, O.L.A.: Direct Fabrication of Custom Orthopedic Implants Using Electron Beam Melting Technology. In: Advanced Manufacturing Technology for Medical Applications: Reverse Engineering, Software Conversion and Rapid Prototyping (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burger, A., Davidson, D., Baldock, R.: Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics. Principles and Practice, 1st edn. Computational Biology, vol. 6, XVI, 356 p. (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schulz, S., Hahn, U.: Parts, Locations, and Holes – Formal Reasoning about Anatomical Structures. In: Quaglini, S., Barahona, P., Andreassen, S. (eds.) AIME 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2101, pp. 293–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stewart, G.: Supply-chain operations reference model (SCOR): the first cross-industry framework for integrated supply-chain management. Logistics Information Management 10(2), 62–67 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zdravković, M., Panetto, H., Trajanović, M., Aubrey, A.: An approach for formalising the supply chain operations. Enterprise Information Systems 5(4), 401–421 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Christensen, A., Chen, D.: Personalizing Orthopedic Implants, MDDI Online (2008), http://www.mddionline.com/article/personalizing-orthopedic-implants

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milan Zdravković
    • 1
  • Miroslav Trajanović
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of NišNišSerbia

Personalised recommendations