Advertisement

A Panorama of the Semantic EAI Initiatives and the Adoption of Ontologies by these Initiatives

  • Julio Cesar Nardi
  • Ricardo de Almeida Falbo
  • João Paulo A. Almeida
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 144)

Abstract

Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) plays an important role by linking heterogeneous applications in order to support business processes within and across organizations. In this context, semantic conflicts often arise and have to be dealt with to ensure successful interoperation. In recent years, many EAI initiatives have aimed at addressing semantic interoperability challenges by employing ontologies in various ways. This paper aims to reveal, through a systematic review method, some aspects associated with semantic EAI initiatives and the adoption of ontologies by them, namely: (i) the business application domains in which these initiatives have been conducted; (ii) the focus of the initiatives regarding integration layers (data, message/service, and process); (iii) the adoption of ontologies by EAI research along the years; and (iv) the characteristics of these ontologies. We provide a panorama of these aspects and identify gaps and trends that may guide further research.

Keywords

enterprise application integration semantics ontology systematic mapping 

References

  1. 1.
    Vernadat, F.B.: Interoperable enterprise systems: Principles, concepts, and methods. Annual Reviews in Control 31, 137–145 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gacitua-Decar, V., Pahl, C.: Ontology-based Patterns for the Integration of Business Processes and Enterprise Application Architectures. In: Mentzas, G., et al. (eds.) Semantic Enterprise Application Integration for Business Processes: Service-Oriented Frameworks. IGI Pub. (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Izza, S.: Integration of industrial information systems: from syntactic to semantic integration approaches. Enterprise Information Systems 3, 1–57 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bussler, C.: The Role of Semantic Web Technology in Enterprise Application Integration. IEEE Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering 26, 62–68 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering (Version 2.3) - EBSE Technical Report. EBSE-2007-01 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Endrei, M., Alari, G., Ambati, A., Krogdahl, P., Martin, C.: Patterns: Serial Process Flows for Intra- and Inter-enterprise. IBM Redbooks (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology and Information Systems. Formal Ontology and Information Systems, 3 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gòmez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martín-Recuerda, F.: Application Integration Using Conceptual Spaces (CSpaces). In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z.-Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) ASWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4185, pp. 234–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alazeib, A., Balogh, A., Bauer, M., Bouras, A., Friesen, A., Gouvas, P., Mentzas, G., Pace, A.: Towards semantically-assisted design of collaborative business processes in EAI scenarios. In: 5th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Vienna-Austria, pp. 779–784 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bouras, A., Gouvas, P., Kourtesis, D., Mentzas, G.: Semantic Integration of Business Applications Across Collaborative Value Networks. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Novais, P., Analide, C. (eds.) Establishing the Foundation of Collaborative Networks. IFIP, vol. 243, pp. 539–546. Springer, Boston (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paulheim, H., Probst, F.: Application integration on the user interface level: An ontology-based approach. Data & Knowledge Engineering 69, 1103–1116 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Treiblmayr, M., Scheider, S., Krüger, A., Von der Linden, M.: Integrating GI with non-GI services – showcasing interoperability in a heterogeneous service-oriented architecture. GeoInformatica 16, 207–220 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Levine, D.M., Stephan, D., Krehbiel, T.C., Berenson, M.L.: Statistics for Managers using Microsoft Excel. Prentice Hall (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guizzardi, G.: On Ontology, ontologies, Conceptualizations, Modeling Languages, and (Meta)Models. In: Vasilecas, O., Edler, J., Caplinskas, A. (eds.) Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Databases and Information Systems IV, pp. 18–39. IOS Press, Amsterdã (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julio Cesar Nardi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ricardo de Almeida Falbo
    • 2
  • João Paulo A. Almeida
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Group in Applied Informatics, Informatics DepartmentFederal Institute of Espírito SantoColatinaBrazil
  2. 2.Ontology & Conceptual Modeling Research Group (NEMO), Computer Science DepartmentFederal University of Espírito SantoVitóriaBrazil

Personalised recommendations