Toward a Methodology to Control Interoperability Improvement Projects Execution

  • Abderrahim Taoudi
  • Bouchaib Bounabat
  • Badr Elmir
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 144)

Abstract

In front of the increasing complexity of information systems, improving enterprise interoperability has become a crucial element for better management. To address this issue, several research projects have been launched during the last decade and have resulted in a set of frameworks which help organizing and performing enterprise interoperability projects efficiently. In addition to these frameworks, many metrics have been also developed to measure the interoperability degree between systems. However, these frameworks and metrics are not sufficient to better control execution of these projects. Indeed, they don’t take into account resource management and unanticipated events or situations that can be encountered during execution. Moreover, there is a real lack in methodologies to deal with this situation. The aim of this paper is to introduce a new approach to control interoperability improvement projects execution by using control theory, project planning theory and a specific quantitative interoperability metric RatIop.

Keywords

RatIop Control theory Enterprise Interoperability Project planning theory Interoperability improvement Automated Business Processes 

References

  1. 1.
    IEEE: IEEE standard computer dictionary: a compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ATHENA: Advanced Technologies for Interoperability of Heterogeneous Enterprise Networks and their Applications, FP6-2002-IST-1, Integrated Project (2003) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    INTEROP: Interoperability Research for Networked Enterprises Applications and Software, network of excellence (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, D., Daclin, N.: Framework for enterprise interoperability. In: IFAC TC5.3 Workshop EI2N, Bordeaux, France (2006) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C4ISR: Architecture Working Group (AWG), Levels of Information Systems Interoperability (LISI) (1998) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    IDEAS: IDEAS Project Deliverables (WP1-WP7), Public reports (2003), www.ideas-roadmap.net (retrieved)
  7. 7.
    EIF: European Interoperability Framework, White Paper, Brussels (2004), http://www.comptia.org
  8. 8.
    Ford, T.C., Colomb, J., Grahamr, S.R., Jacques, D.R.: A survey on interoperability measurement. In: Proceedings of 12th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Newport, RI (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, D., Vallespir, B., Daclin, N.: An approach for enterprise interoperability measurement. In: Proceedings of MoDISE-EUS, France (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elmir, B., Bounabat, B.: A Novel Approach for Periodic Assessment of Business Process Interoperability. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues 8(4) (2011), ISSN (Online): 1694-0814, www.IJCSI.org
  11. 11.
    Guédria, W., Naudet, Y., Chen, D.: Interoperability Maturity Models – Survey and Comparison. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2008 Workshop. LNCS, vol. 5333, pp. 273–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michelson, B.: Event-Driven Architecture Overview. Technical Report. Patricia Seybold Group, Boston, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elmir, B., Alrajeh, N.A., Bounabat, B.: Interoperability monitoring for e-government service delivery based on enterprise architecture. In: International Conference on Information Management and Evaluation (ICIME), Toronto, Canada (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams, T.M.: The contribution of mathematical modelling to the practice of project management. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 14, 3–30 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Project Management Institute: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). Project Management Institute, Upper Darby, PA, US (2000) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gandhi, N., Tilbury, D.M., Diao, Y., Hellerstein, J., Parekh, S.: Mimo control of an apache web server: Modeling and controller design. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lu, C., Abdelzaher, T., Stankovic, J., Son, S.: A Feedback Control Approach for Guaranteeing Relative Delays in Web Servers. In: IEEE Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium, Taipei, Taiwan (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gandhi, N., Parekh, S., Hellerstein, J., Tilbury, D.M.: Feedback Control of a Lotus Notes Server: Modeling and Control Design. In: American Control Conference, Arlington, VA, USA (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mascolo, S.: Classical Control Theory for Congestion Avoidance in High-speed Internet. In: Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Decision & Control, Phoenix, Arizona, US (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chiu, D., Jain, R.: Analysis of the Increase and Decrease Algorithms for Congestion Avoidance in Computer Networks. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 17(1) (1989)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hellerstein, J.L., Diao, Y., Parekh, S., Tilbury, D.M.: Feedback Control of Computing Systems. John Wiley & Sons (2004) ISBN 0-471-26637-X Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abderrahim Taoudi
    • 1
  • Bouchaib Bounabat
    • 1
  • Badr Elmir
    • 1
  1. 1.Al-Qualsadi Research & Development Team, Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Informatique et d’Analyses des Systèmes (ENSIAS)Mohamed V – Souissi UniversityRabatMorocco

Personalised recommendations