Business Rules Management Solutions: Added Value by Effective Means of Business Interoperability

  • Martijn Zoet
  • Johan Versendaal
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 144)


Interoperability research, to date, primarily focuses on data, processes and technology and not explicitly on business rules. The core problem of interoperability from an organisation’s perspective is the added value generated from collaborating with other parties. The added value from a data, process and technology perspective has been widely researched. Therefore it is the aim of this study to provide insights into the added value for organisations to collaborate when executing business rules management solutions. Explanations of possibilities, opportunities and challenges can help to increase the understanding of business rules interoperability value creation. Presented results provide a grounded basis from which empirical and practical investigation can be further explored.


Business Rules Management Interoperability BRM Business Interoperability 


  1. 1.
    Shao, J., Pound, C.J.: Extracting business rules from information systems. BT Technology Journal, 179–186 (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bajec, M., Krisper, M.: A methodology and tool support for managing business rules in organisations. Information Systems 30, 423–443 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zoet, M., Welke, R., Versendaal, J., Ravesteyn, P.: Aligning Risk Management and Compliance Considerations with Business Process Development. In: Di Noia, T., Buccafurri, F. (eds.) EC-Web 2009. LNCS, vol. 5692, pp. 157–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morgan, T.: Business rules and information systems: aligning IT with business goals. Addision-Wesley, London (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arnott, D., Pervan, G.: A critical analysis of decision support systems research. Journal of Information Technology 20, 67–87 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosca, D., Wild, C.: Towards a flexible deployment of business rules. Expert Systems with Applications 23, 385–394 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nelson, M.L., Peterson, J., Rariden, R.L., Sen, R.: Transitioning to a business rule management service model: Case studies from the property and casualty insurance industry. Information & Management 47, 30–41 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. HarperBusiness, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lankhorst, M., Janssen, W., Proper, H., Steen, M.: Introducing Agile Service Development. In: Lankhorst, M. (ed.) Agile Service Development. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Molina, A., Panetto, H., Chen, D., Whitman, L., Chapurlat, V., Vernadat, F.: Enterprise Integration and Networking: Challenges and Trends. Studies in Informatics and Control, vol. 16, pp. 353–368. Informatics and Control Publications (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, D., Vallespir, B., Daclin, N.: An Approach for Enterprise Interoperability Measurement. In: Ebersold, S., Front, A., Lopistéguy, P., Nurcan, S., Franch, X., Hunt, E., Coletta, R. (eds.) International Workshop on Model Driven Information Systems Engineering: Enterprise, User and System Models, Montpellier, France. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 1–12 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edmondson, A., McManus, S.: Methodological Fit in Management Field Research. Academy of Management Review 32, 1155–1179 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nelson, M.L., Rariden, R.L., Sen, R.: A Lifecycle Approach towards Business Rules Management. In: 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, pp. 113–123 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zoet, M., Versendaal, J.: Business Rules Based Perspective on Services: A Mixed Method Analysis (2012) (manuscript submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plomp, M., Batenburg, R.: Measuring Chain Digitisation Maturity: An assessment of Dutch Retail Branches. Supply Chain Management 15, 227–237 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferlie, E., McGivern, G., FitzGerald, L.: A new mode of organizing in healthcare? Governmentality and managed networks in cancers service in England. Social Science & Medicine 74, 340–347 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chiu, C., Tsai, C.: A Web Services-Based Collaborative Scheme for Credit Card Fraud Detection. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service, pp. 177–181. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Monsieur, G., De Rore, L., Snoeck, M., Lemahieu, W.: Handling Atomic Business Services. In: 15th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, PLOP Conference, pp. 1–12 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zoet, M., Versendaal, J., Ravesteyn, P., Welke, R.: Alignment of Business Process Management and Business Rules. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foucault, M.: Security, territoty, population - lectures at the college of france 1977 - 1987. Picador, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Office, A.T., Legal Database Australian Taxation Office (2012),
  22. 22.
    Fifer, S., Everett, W., Adams, M., Vincequere, J.: Critical Care, Critical Choices: The Case for Tele-ICUs in Intensive Care. In: King, N., Coffmann, G., Handt, J., Melissinos, D. (eds.) New England Healthcare Institute (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Legner, C., Lebreton, B.: Business Interoperability Research: Present Achievements and Upcoming Challenges. Electronic Markets 17, 176–186 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martijn Zoet
    • 1
  • Johan Versendaal
    • 1
  1. 1.HU University of Applied SciencesUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations