Skip to main content

Modeling a Model Transformation Language

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Domain Engineering

Abstract

Domain-specific modeling techniques can reduce the gap between the problem space and the solution space by using abstractions and notations that represent domain concepts. The fact that only familiar concepts and notations are used in the model allows domain experts to understand and be involved directly in design. The resulting artifacts of this process are models and transformations. There are well-known techniques for developing modeling languages (e.g., meta-modeling and synthesis of modeling environments); however, there is currently no well-defined technique for engineering model transformation languages (MTLs). This chapter introduces a language engineering technique for building MTLs that is based on treating each MTL as a domain-specific language, more specifically, as languages for describing specific classes of transformations. In this approach, all the components of an MTL are modeled explicitly at the proper level of abstraction using the most appropriate formalisms. Consequently, this facilitates the automatic synthesis of MTL development environments and supports the evolution of model transformations, which assists domain experts in designing models and transformations in an integrated and uniform manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A pivot acts like a parameter for transformation rules. It allows certain elements bound in one rule to be passed to another rule.

  2. 2.

    The mapping can be executed after bootstraping.

References

  1. Baar, T., Whittle, J.: On the usage of concrete syntax in model transformation rules. In: Virbitskaite, I., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Perspectives of Systems Informatics, LNCS, vol. 4378, pp. 84–97. Springer, Novosibirsk (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Balogh, A., Varró, D.: Advanced model transformation language constructs in the VIATRA2 framework. In: Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1280–1287. ACM, Dijon (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barroca, B., Lúcio, L., Amaral, V., Felix, R., Sousa, V.: DSLTrans: A turing incomplete transformation language. In: International Conference on Software Language Engineering, LNCS. Springer, Eindhoven (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bézivin, J., Büttner, F., Gogolla, M., Jouault, F., Kurtev, I., Lindow, A.: Model transformations? Transformation models! In: Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 440–453. Springer, Genova (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bolduc, J.S., Vangheluwe, H.: The modelling and simulation package pythonDEVS for classical hierarchical DEVS. MSDL technical report msdl-tr-2001–01, McGill University (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S.: Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches. IBM Syst. J. Spec. Issue Model Driven Software Dev. 45(3), 621–645 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dong, X.: ARK, the metamodelling kernel for domain specific modelling. Master’s thesis, McGill University (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Kreowski, H.J., Rozenberg, G.: Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation, vol. 1: Foundations. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ermel, C., Ehrig, K., Taentzer, G., Weiss, E.: Object oriented and rule-based design of visual languages using Tiger. In: Zündorf, A., Varró, D. (eds.) International Workshop on Graph Based Tools, ECEASST, vol. 1, pp. 1–13. Natal (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. France, R., Ghosh, S., Dinh Trong, T., Solberg, A.: Model-driven development using UML 2.0: Promises and pitfalls. IEEE Comput. 39(2), 59–66 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gray, J., Tolvanen, J.P., Kelly, S., Gokhale, A., Neema, S., Sprinkle, J.: Domain-specific modeling. In: Fishwick, P.A. (ed.) CRC Handbook of Dynamic System Modeling, Chap. 7, pp. 1–20. CRC (2007)

  12. Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility 2.4 Core Specification (2011). http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/. Access 24 Apr 2013

  13. Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification (2011). http://www.omg.org/spec/QVT/. Access 24 Apr 2013

  14. Harel, D., Rumpe, B.: Meaningful modeling: What’s the semantics of “Semantics”? Computer 37(10), 64–72 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hausmann, J.H., Heckel, R., Taentzer, G.: Detection of conflicting functional requirements in a use case-driven approach. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 105–115. ACM, Orlando (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heckel, R., Küster, J.M., Taentzer, G.: Confluence of typed attributed graph transformation systems. In: Corradini, A., Ehrig, H., Kreowski, H.J., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) International Conference on Graph Transformation, LNCS, vol. 2505, pp. 161–176. Springer, Barcelona (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Jouault, F., Allilaire, F., Bézivin, J., Kurtev, I.: ATL: A model transformation tool. Sci. Comput. Program. 72(1–2), 31–39 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly, S., Lyytinen, K., Rossi, M.: MetaEdit + A fully configurable multi-user and multi-tool CASE and CAME environment. In: Iivari, J., Lyytinen, K., Rossi, M. (eds.) Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, LNCS, vol. 1080, pp. 1–21. Springer, Crete (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.P.: Domain-Specific Modeling: Enabling Full Code Generation. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Kilov, H.: From semantic to object-oriented data modeling. In: First International Conference on System Integration, pp. 385–393. IEEE, Piscataway (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kleppe, A.G., Warmer, J., Bast, W.: MDA Explained. The Model Driven Architecture: Practice And Promise. Reading, Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kühne, T.: Matters of (meta-)modeling. J. Softw. Syst. Model. 5(4), 369–385 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kühne, T., Mezei, G., Syriani, E., Vangheluwe, H., Wimmer, M.: Systematic transformation development. Electron. Comm. Eur. Assoc. Software Sci. Tech. 21 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lano, K., Kolahdouz Rahimi, S., Poernomo, I.: Comparative evaluation of model transformation specification approaches. Int. J. Softw. Informat. 6(2), 233–269 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. de Lara, J., Vangheluwe, H.: AToM3: A tool for multi-formalism and meta-modelling. In: Kutsche, R.D., Weber, H. (eds.) Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, LNCS, vol. 2306, pp. 174–188. Springer, Grenoble (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. de Lara, J., Vangheluwe, H., Moreno, M.A.: Meta-modelling and graph grammars for multi-paradigm modelling in AToM3. J. Softw. Syst. Model. 3(3), 194–209 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lédeczi, Á., Bakay, A., Maroti, M., V”olgyesi, P., Nordstrom, G., Sprinkle, J., Karsai, G.: Composing domain-specific design environments. IEEE Comput. 34(11), 44–51 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lengyel, L., Levendovszky, T., Mezei, G., Charaf, H.: Model transformation with a visual control flow language. Int. J. Comput. Sci. 1(1), 45–53 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mosterman, P.J., Vangheluwe, H.: Computer automated multi-paradigm modeling: an introduction. Simulat. Trans. Soc. Model. Simulat. Int. 80(9), 433–450 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Muller, P.A., Fleurey, F., Jézéquel, J.M.: Weaving executability into object-oriented meta-languages. In: Briand, L., Kent, S. (eds.) MODELS/UML’2005, LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 264–278. Springer, Montego Bay (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nordstrom, S., Shetty, S., Chhokra, K.G., Sprinkle, J., Eames, B., Lédeczi, Á.: ANEMIC: automatic interface enabler for model integrated computing. In: Generative Programming and Component Engineering, LNCS, vol. 2830, pp. 138–150. Springer, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rumpe, B., Weisemöller, I.: A domain specific transformation language. In: Models and Evolution. Wellington (2011). Available at: http://www.se-rwth.de/publications/BR.IW.A.Domain.Specific.Transformation.Language_ME_2011.pdf

  33. Sendall, S., Kozaczynski, W.: Model Transformation: The heart and soul of model-driven software development. IEEE Softw. 20, 42–45 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stahl, T., Voelter, M., Czarnecki, K.: Model-Driven Software Development – Technology, Engineering, Management. Wiley, West Sussex (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Syriani, E.: A multi-paradigm foundation for model transformation language engineering. Ph.d. thesis, McGill University (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Syriani, E., Vangheluwe, H.: Programmed graph rewriting with DEVS. In: Nagl, M., Schürr, A. (eds.) International Symposium on the Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance, LNCS, vol. 5088, pp. 136–152. Springer, Kassel (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Syriani, E., Vangheluwe, H.: De-/Re-constructing model transformation languages. Electron. Comm. Eur. Assoc. Software Sci. Tech. 29 (2010) Available at: http://journal.ub.tu-berlin.de/index.php/eceasst/article/view/407

  38. Syriani, E., Vangheluwe, H.: A modular timed model transformation language. J. Softw. Syst. Model. 11, 1–28 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tisi, M., Jouault, F., Fraternali, P., Ceri, S., Bézivin, J.: On the use of higher-order model transformations. In: Paige, R., Hartman, A., Rensink, A. (eds.) European Conference on Model Driven Architecture: Foundations and Applications, LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 18–33. Springer, Enschede (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Wimmer, M., Kusel, A., Schönböck, J., Reiter, T., Retschitzegger, W., Schwinger, W.: Lets’s play the token game – model transformations powered by transformation nets. In: Workshop on Petri Nets and Software Engineering, pp. 35–50. Université Paris 13, Paris (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zeigler, B.P.: Multifacetted Modelling and Discrete Event Simulation. Academic Press, San Diego (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported partially by NSF CAREER award CCF-1052616.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene Syriani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Syriani, E., Gray, J., Vangheluwe, H. (2013). Modeling a Model Transformation Language. In: Reinhartz-Berger, I., Sturm, A., Clark, T., Cohen, S., Bettin, J. (eds) Domain Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36654-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36654-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36653-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36654-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics