Skip to main content

Capturing User’s Interest from Human-Computer Interaction Logging

  • Conference paper
Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 140))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2416 Accesses

Abstract

Mining user’s expectations and interests has become the focus of many Internet-based application providers, such as those operating in the areas of social networks, search engines, e-commerce, and so forth. This is often accomplished by means of explicit feedbacks requested to end-users, which might yield distorted results due to the intrusive nature of this kind of approach. Thus, it would be desirable using implicit feedbacks, provide that they faithfully reflect user’s habits and expectations. In this paper we propose an approach to capture user’s feedbacks from their interaction actions while processing a document, with particular emphasis on web documents. To this end, we propose a new model to interpret mouse cursor actions, such as scrolling, movement, text selection, while reading web documents, aiming to infer a relevance value indicating how the user found the document useful for his/her purposes. We have implemented the proposed model through light-weight components, which can be easily installed within major web browsers as a plug-in. The components log mouse cursor actions that we have used as experimental data in order to validate the proposed model. The experimental results show that the proposed model is able to predict user feedbacks with an acceptable level of accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical Report 1999-66. Stanford InfoLab (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mandl, T.: Implementation and evaluation of a quality-based search engine. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, HYPERTEXT 2006, pp. 73–84. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Golder, S., Huberman, B.A.: The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 32, 198–208 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Agichtein, E., Brill, E., Dumais, S., Ragno, R.: Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences. In: Proceedings of the 29th International ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2006, pp. 3–10. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fox, S., Karnawat, K., Mydland, M., Dumais, S., White, T.: Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 23, 147–168 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, M.C., Anderson, J.R., Sohn, M.H.: What can a mouse cursor tell us more?: correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing. In: Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2001, pp. 281–282. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mueller, F., Lockerd, A.: Cheese: tracking mouse movement activity on websites, a tool for user modeling. In: Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2001, pp. 279–280. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hunziker, H.W.: Im Auge des Lesers foveale und periphere Wahrnehmung: vom Buchstabieren zur Lesefreude (In the eye of the reader: foveal and peripheral perception - from letter recognition to the joy of reading). Transmedia Zurich (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nielsen, J.: How little do users read? (2008), http://www.useit.com/alertbox/percent-text-read.html

  10. Nielsen, J.: F-shaped pattern for reading web content (2006), http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html

  11. Huang, J., White, R.W., Dumais, S.: No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search. In: Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, pp. 1225–1234. ACM, New York (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Murray, G.: Asynchronous javascript technology and XML (ajax) with the java platform (2006), http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2EE/AJAX/

  13. Dodge, B.: Webquests: A technique for internet-based learning. Distance Educator 1, 10–13 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bath, J.: Answer-changing behaviour on objective examinations. The Journal of Educational Research 1, 105–107 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Best, J.B.: Item difficulty and answer changing. Teaching of Psychology 6, 228–240 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnston, J.: Exam taking speed and grades. Teaching of Psychology, 148–149 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paul, C.A., Rosenkoetter, J.S.: The relationship between the time taken to complete an examination and the test score received. Teaching of Psychology, 108–109 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McClain, L.: Behavior during examinations: A comparison of “a”, “c,” and “f” students. Teaching of Psychology 10, 69–71 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arroyo, E., Selker, T., Wei, W.: Usability tool for analysis of web designs using mouse tracks. In: Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2006, pp. 484–489. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Atterer, R., Wnuk, M., Schmidt, A.: Knowing the user’s every move: user activity tracking for website usability evaluation and implicit interaction. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2006, pp. 203–212. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly, D., Teevan, J.: Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: A bibliography. SIGIR Forum (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yanbe, Y., Jatowt, A., Nakamura, S., Tanaka, K.: Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web? In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2007, pp. 107–116. ACM, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Gay, G.: Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2005, pp. 154–161. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jung, S., Herlocker, J.L., Webster, J.: Click data as implicit relevance feedback in web search. Inf. Process. Manage. 43, 791–807 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Radlinski, F., Joachims, T.: Query chains: learning to rank from implicit feedback. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining, KDD 2005, pp. 239–248. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Agichtein, E., Zheng, Z.: Identifying ”best bet” web search results by mining past user behavior. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2006, pp. 902–908. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bilenko, M., White, R.W.: Mining the search trails of surfing crowds: identifying relevant websites from user activity. In: Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2008, pp. 51–60. ACM, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Claypool, M., Le, P., Wased, M., Brown, D.: Implicit interest indicators. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2001, pp. 33–40. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kelly, D., Belkin, N.J.: Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects. In: Proceedings of the 27th International ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2004, pp. 377–384. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Konstan, J.A., Miller, B.N., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J.L., Gordon, L.R., Riedl, J.: GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Commun. ACM 40, 77–87 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu, S., Zhu, Y., Jiang, H., Lau, F.C.M.: A user-oriented webpage ranking algorithm based on user attention time. In: Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2008, vol. 2, pp. 1255–1260. AAAI Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Deufemia, V., Giordano, M., Polese, G., Tortora, G. (2013). Capturing User’s Interest from Human-Computer Interaction Logging. In: Cordeiro, J., Krempels, KH. (eds) Web Information Systems and Technologies. WEBIST 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 140. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36608-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36608-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36607-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36608-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics